Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2017; 21(02): 147-164
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599211
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA

Surgical Correction of Articular Damage in the Knee: Osteoarticular Transplantation to Joint Reconstruction

Xue Susan Bai
1   Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
,
Jonelle M. Thomas
2   Department of Radiology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
,
Alice S. Ha
1   Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 March 2017 (online)

Abstract

Injuries of the articular cartilage remain difficult to treat and can range from small articular cartilage defects to end-stage severe osteoarthritis. In this review, we discuss various surgical treatment options including imaging features and associated complications. Specifically, we review microfracture, acellular matrix-induced microfracture, autologous osteochondral transplantation, osteochondral allograft transplantation, autologous chondrocyte implantation, along with various forms of knee arthroplasties.

 
  • References

  • 1 Frisbie DD, Oxford JT, Southwood L , et al. Early events in cartilage repair after subchondral bone microfracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (407) 215-227
  • 2 Prakash D, Learmonth D. Natural progression of osteo-chondral defect in the femoral condyle. Knee 2002; 9 (1) 7-10
  • 3 Kock NB, Smolders JM, van Susante JL, Buma P, van Kampen A, Verdonschot N. A cadaveric analysis of contact stress restoration after osteochondral transplantation of a cylindrical cartilage defect. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (5) 461-468
  • 4 Cain EL, Clancy WG. Treatment algorithm for osteochondral injuries of the knee. Clin Sports Med 2001; 20 (2) 321-342
  • 5 Outerbridge RE. Further studies on the etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1964; 46: 179-190
  • 6 Brittberg M, Winalski CS. Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (Suppl. 02) 58-69
  • 7 Sgaglione NA, Miniaci A, Gillogly SD, Carter TR. Update on advanced surgical techniques in the treatment of traumatic focal articular cartilage lesions in the knee. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (2, Suppl 1): 9-32
  • 8 Garrick JG , ed. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Sports Medicine. 3rd ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 2004
  • 9 Krüger T, Wohlrab D, Birke A, Hein W. Results of arthroscopic joint debridement in different stages of chondromalacia of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000; 120 (5–6) 338-342
  • 10 Health Quality Ontario. Arthroscopic lavage and debridement for osteoarthritis of the knee: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2005; 5 (12) 1-37
  • 11 Johnson LL. Arthroscopic abrasion arthroplasty historical and pathologic perspective: present status. Arthroscopy 1986; 2 (1) 54-69
  • 12 Farr J, Cole B, Dhawan A, Kercher J, Sherman S. Clinical cartilage restoration: evolution and overview. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (10) 2696-2705
  • 13 Shah MR, Kaplan KM, Meislin RJ, Bosco III JA. Articular cartilage restoration of the knee. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2007; 65 (1) 51-60
  • 14 Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Kocher MS, Gill TJ, Rodkey WG. Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (5) 477-484
  • 15 McNickle AG, Provencher MT, Cole BJ. Overview of existing cartilage repair technology. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2008; 16 (4) 196-201
  • 16 Knutsen G, Drogset JO, Engebretsen L , et al. A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (10) 2105-2112
  • 17 Kreuz PC, Erggelet C, Steinwachs MR , et al. Is microfracture of chondral defects in the knee associated with different results in patients aged 40 years or younger?. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (11) 1180-1186
  • 18 Filardo G, Kon E, Roffi A, Di Martino A, Marcacci M. Scaffold-based repair for cartilage healing: a systematic review and technical note. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (1) 174-186
  • 19 Mithoefer K, Williams III RJ, Warren RF , et al. The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (9) 1911-1920
  • 20 Domayer SE, Welsch GH, Dorotka R , et al. MRI monitoring of cartilage repair in the knee: a review. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2008; 12 (4) 302-317
  • 21 Marcacci M, Kon E, Delcogliano M, Filardo G, Busacca M, Zaffagnini S. Arthroscopic autologous osteochondral grafting for cartilage defects of the knee: prospective study results at a minimum 7-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (12) 2014-2021
  • 22 Kish G, Módis L, Hangody L. Osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee and talus in the athlete. Rationale, indications, techniques, and results. Clin Sports Med 1999; 18 (1) 45-66 , vi
  • 23 Favinger JL, Ha AS, Brage ME, Chew FS. Osteoarticular transplantation: recognizing expected postsurgical appearances and complications. Radiographics 2015; 35 (3) 780-792
  • 24 Bugbee WD, Khanna G, Cavallo M, McCauley JC, Görtz S, Brage ME. Bipolar fresh osteochondral allografting of the tibiotalar joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (5) 426-432
  • 25 Link TM, Mischung J, Wörtler K, Burkart A, Rummeny EJ, Imhoff AB. Normal and pathological MR findings in osteochondral autografts with longitudinal follow-up. Eur Radiol 2006; 16 (1) 88-96
  • 26 Sanders TG, Mentzer KD, Miller MD, Morrison WB, Campbell SE, Penrod BJ. Autogenous osteochondral “plug” transfer for the treatment of focal chondral defects: postoperative MR appearance with clinical correlation. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30 (10) 570-578
  • 27 Hangody L, Kish G, Kárpáti Z, Szerb I, Udvarhelyi I. Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects. A preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1997; 5 (4) 262-267
  • 28 Gold GE, Bergman AG, Pauly JM , et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage repair. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 9 (6) 377-392
  • 29 Choi YS, Potter HG, Chun TJ. MR imaging of cartilage repair in the knee and ankle. Radiographics 2008; 28 (4) 1043-1059
  • 30 Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 (14) 889-895
  • 31 Ozmeriç A, Alemdaroğlu KB, Aydoğan NH. Treatment for cartilage injuries of the knee with a new treatment algorithm. World J Orthop 2014; 5 (5) 677-684
  • 32 Alparslan L, Winalski CS, Boutin RD, Minas T. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage repair. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2001; 5 (4) 345-363
  • 33 Trattnig S, Ba-Ssalamah A, Pinker K, Plank C, Vecsei V, Marlovits S. Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair: noninvasive monitoring by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23 (7) 779-787
  • 34 Trattnig S, Pinker K, Krestan C, Plank C, Millington S, Marlovits S. Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair with HyalograftC: two-year follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57 (1) 9-15
  • 35 Parvizi J, Sharkey P, Sanfilippo JA. Total Knee Arthroplasty. Adult Reconstruction and Arthroplasty: Core Knowledge in Orthopedics. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2007
  • 36 Geller JA, Yoon RS, Macaulay W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a controversial history and a rationale for contemporary resurgence. J Knee Surg 2008; 21 (1) 7-14
  • 37 Borus T, Thornhill T. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008; 16 (1) 9-18
  • 38 Bert JM. Unicompartmental knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36 (4) 513-522
  • 39 Morgan H, Battista V, Leopold SS. Constraint in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13 (8) 515-524
  • 40 Mulcahy H, Chew FS. Current concepts in knee replacement: features and imaging assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201 (6) W828–W842
  • 41 Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82 (8) 1189-1195
  • 42 Karachalios T, Roidis N, Giotikas D, Bargiotas K, Varitimidis S, Malizos KN. A mid-term clinical outcome study of the Advance Medial Pivot knee arthroplasty. Knee 2009; 16 (6) 484-488
  • 43 Long WJ, Scuderi GR. High-flexion total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (7, Suppl): 6-10
  • 44 Luo SX, Su W, Zhao JM, Sha K, Wei QJ, Li XF. High-flexion vs conventional prostheses total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (6) 847-854
  • 45 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Gender-specific knee replacements: a technology overview. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008; 16 (2) 63-67
  • 46 Huang CH, Liau JJ, Cheng CK. Fixed or mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg 2007; 2: 1
  • 47 Freeman MA, Samuelson KM, Elias SG, Mariorenzi LJ, Gokcay EI, Tuke M. The patellofemoral joint in total knee prostheses. Design considerations. J Arthroplasty 1989; 4 (Suppl): S69-S74
  • 48 Rosenstein AD, Postak PD, Greenwald AS. Fixation strength comparison of onlay and inset patellar implants. Knee 2007; 14 (3) 194-197
  • 49 Gonzalez MH, Mekhail AO. The failed total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and etiology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004; 12 (6) 436-446
  • 50 Math KR, Zaidi SF, Petchprapa C, Harwin SF. Imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2006; 10 (1) 47-63
  • 51 Love C, Tomas MB, Marwin SE, Pugliese PV, Palestro CJ. Role of nuclear medicine in diagnosis of the infected joint replacement. Radiographics 2001; 21 (5) 1229-1238
  • 52 Allen AM, Ward WG, Pope Jr TL. Imaging of the total knee arthroplasty. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33 (2) 289-303
  • 53 Bayley JC, Scott RD, Ewald FC, Holmes Jr GB. Failure of the metal-backed patellar component after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70 (5) 668-674
  • 54 Chew F, Roberts C. Total knee replacement. Part 2. Imaging of complications. Contemp Diagn Radiol 2006; 29: 1-6
  • 55 Buckwalter KA, Parr JA, Choplin RH, Capello WN. Multichannel CT imaging of orthopedic hardware and implants. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2006; 10 (1) 86-97
  • 56 Gupta SK, Chu A, Ranawat AS, Slamin J, Ranawat CS. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (6) 787-799
  • 57 Hayter CL, Koff MF, Shah P, Koch KM, Miller TT, Potter HG. MRI after arthroplasty: comparison of MAVRIC and conventional fast spin-echo techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (3) 405-411
  • 58 Parratte S, Pagnano MW. Instability after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (1) 184-194
  • 59 Villanueva M, Ríos-Luna A, Pereiro J, Fahandez-Saddi H, Pérez-Caballer A. Dislocation following total knee arthroplasty: a report of six cases. Indian J Orthop 2010; 44 (4) 438-443
  • 60 Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW. Classification of periprosthetic fractures complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1999; 30 (2) 209-214
  • 61 Felix NA, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD. Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; (345) 113-124
  • 62 Bourne RB. Fractures of the patella after total knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 1999; 30 (2) 287-291
  • 63 Eisenhuth SA, Saleh KJ, Cui Q, Clark CR, Brown TE. Patellofemoral instability after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 446 (445) 149-160
  • 64 Schoderbek Jr RJ, Brown TE, Mulhall KJ , et al. Extensor mechanism disruption after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 446 (446) 176-185
  • 65 Healy WL, Wasilewski SA, Takei R, Oberlander M. Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Correlation with implant design and patient risk factors. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10 (2) 197-201
  • 66 Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (286) 40-47