Effect of Annular Defects on Intradiscal Pressures in the Lumbar Spine: An in Vitro Biomechanical Study of Diskectomy and Annular Repair

Abstract

Background Integrity of intervertebral disks may influence, and be influenced by, the maintenance of hydrostatic pressures inside the nucleus pulposus. Disk degeneration causes decreased pressures, leading to overload and injury of the annulus fibrosus, increasing the risk of disk herniation. Diskectomies to treat disk herniation can cause further loss of hydrostatic pressures resulting in worsening degeneration. This study investigated the impact of opening the annulus on intradiscal pressure and whether implantation of an annular closure device (ACD) can restore physiologic pressures.

Methods The pressure responses under unconstrained moments in concert with axial compressive loads of nine human cadaver lumbar disks were biomechanically tested at baseline, immediately following posterior annulotomy, and immediately following implantation of the ACD.

Results The analysis of variance indicated a significant difference in the pressure response (p = 0.0001) among the three rounds of testing. Specifically, the post hoc Bonferroni test revealed that the pressure response after diskectomy was significantly different when compared with baseline (p < 0.001) and after ACD implantation (p = 0.001). However, baseline and ACD pressure responses were insignificantly different (p = 1.000).

Conclusion Our findings suggest that restoration of annular integrity during diskectomy with implantation of the tested ACD may restore pressures closer to preoperative levels. Whether or not restoring pressures to preoperative levels has any clinical benefit or effect on the rate of degeneration is an area for further clinical research.

Keywords

annulus closure device - biomechanics - disk degeneration - intradiscal pressure - lumbar diskectomy

• References

• 1 Heuer F, Schmidt H, Claes L, Wilke HJ. Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase vertebral translation and intradiscal pressure. J Biomech 2007; 40 (4) 795-803
• 2 Hutton WC, Elmer WA, Boden SD , et al. The effect of hydrostatic pressure on intervertebral disc metabolism. Spine 1999; 24 (15) 1507-1515
• 3 Handa T, Ishihara H, Ohshima H, Osada R, Tsuji H, Obata K. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 1997; 22 (10) 1085-1091
• 4 Setton LA, Chen J. Mechanobiology of the intervertebral disc and relevance to disc degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (Suppl. 02) 52-57
• 5 Adams MA, Freeman BJ, Morrison HP, Nelson IW, Dolan P. Mechanical initiation of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2000; 25 (13) 1625-1636
• 6 Neidlinger-Wilke C, Würtz K, Urban JP , et al. Regulation of gene expression in intervertebral disc cells by low and high hydrostatic pressure. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 (Suppl. 03) S372-S378
• 7 Lee SH, Derby R, Chen Y, Seo KS, Kim MJ. In vitro measurement of pressure in intervertebral discs and annulus fibrosus with and without annular tears during discography. Spine J 2004; 4 (6) 614-618
• 8 Adams MA, McMillan DW, Green TP, Dolan P. Sustained loading generates stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 1996; 21 (4) 434-438
• 9 Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P. ‘Stress’ distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78 (6) 965-972
• 10 Masuda K, Aota Y, Muehleman C , et al. A novel rabbit model of mild, reproducible disc degeneration by an anulus needle puncture: correlation between the degree of disc injury and radiological and histological appearances of disc degeneration. Spine 2005; 30 (1) 5-14
• 11 Steffen T, Baramki HG, Rubin R, Antoniou J, Aebi M. Lumbar intradiscal pressure measured in the anterior and posterolateral annular regions during asymmetrical loading. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1998; 13 (7) 495-505
• 12 Mariconda M, Galasso O, Attingenti P, Federico G, Milano C. Frequency and clinical meaning of long-term degenerative changes after lumbar discectomy visualized on imaging tests. Eur Spine J 2010; 19 (1) 136-143
• 13 Barth M, Diepers M, Weiss C, Thomé C. Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 2: radiographic evaluation and correlation with clinical outcome. Spine 2008; 33 (3) 273-279
• 14 Cunningham BW, Kotani Y, McNulty PS, Cappuccino A, McAfee PC. The effect of spinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. Spine 1997; 22 (22) 2655-2663
• 15 Gao SG, Lei GH, He HB , et al. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15 (5) 507-514
• 16 Ahlgren BD, Lui W, Herkowitz HN, Panjabi MM, Guiboux JP. Effect of anular repair on the healing strength of the intervertebral disc: a sheep model. Spine 2000; 25 (17) 2165-2170
• 17 Bouma GJ, Barth M, Ledic D, Vilendecic M. The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (5) 1030-1036
• 18 Trummer M, Eustacchio S, Barth M, Klassen PD, Stein S. Protecting facet joints post-lumbar discectomy: Barricaid annular closure device reduces risk of facet degeneration. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115 (8) 1440-1445
• 19 Wilke HJ, Rohlmann F, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Werner K, Claes L, Kettler A. Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 (6) 720-730
• 20 McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GL, Datoo G , et al. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (2) 338-344 ; discussion 344–345
• 21 Chen YC, Lee SH, Chen D. Intradiscal pressure study of percutaneous disc decompression with nucleoplasty in human cadavers. Spine 2003; 28 (7) 661-665
• 22 Brinckmann P, Grootenboer H. Change of disc height, radial disc bulge, and intradiscal pressure from discectomy. An in vitro investigation on human lumbar discs. Spine 1991; 16 (6) 641-646
• 23 Shahadi F, Luecke M, Preuss M, Huegens-Penzel M, Nestler U. Measurement of intradiscal pressure after lumbar discectomy. Zentralbl Neurochir 2008; 69 (2) 87-89
• 24 Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D. Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (1) 102-108
• 25 Lisi AJ, O'Neill CW, Lindsey DP, Cooperstein R, Cooperstein E, Zucherman JF. Measurement of in vivo lumbar intervertebral disc pressure during spinal manipulation: a feasibility study. J Appl Biomech 2006; 22 (3) 234-239
• 26 Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T. In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine 1999; 24 (23) 2468-2474
• 27 Kim KS, Yoon ST, Li J, Park JS, Hutton WC. Disc degeneration in the rabbit: a biochemical and radiological comparison between four disc injury models. Spine 2005; 30 (1) 33-37
• 28 Heuer F, Ulrich S, Claes L, Wilke HJ. Biomechanical evaluation of conventional anulus fibrosus closure methods required for nucleus replacement. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 9 (3) 307-313
• 29 Chiang CJ, Cheng CK, Sun JS, Liao CJ, Wang YH, Tsuang YH. The effect of a new anular repair after discectomy in intervertebral disc degeneration: an experimental study using a porcine spine model. Spine 2011; 36 (10) 761-769
• 30 Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 1999; 24 (8) 755-762
• 31 Wilke HJ, Ressel L, Heuer F, Graf N, Rath S. Can prevention of a reherniation be investigated? Establishment of a herniation model and experiments with an anular closure device. Spine 2013; 38 (10) E587-E593