Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2015; 19(05): 205-210
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570012
Schwerpunkt Beckeninstabilität
Einführung
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Beckeninstabilität – Wissen und Diagnostizieren

Diane Lee
1   School of Rehabilitation, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 December 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Alles nur Einbildung? Bewegungen im Sakroiliakalgelenk kann man tasten – kann man sich nur einbilden, wenn man unbedingt daran glauben will. Die Expertenmeinungen gehen weit auseinander. Abgesehen davon: Für Patienten ist die Diagnose „instabiles Becken“ ziemlich beunruhigend. Wie man trotz magerer Evidenz sicher diagnostiziert und zwischen systemisch artikulären und neuralen Ursachen differenziert, weiß Diane Lee.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Beales DJ, O’Sullivan PB, Briffa NK. Motor control patterns during active straight leg raise in pain-free subjects. Spine 2008; 34 (1) E1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Buyruk HM, Snijders CJ, Vleeming A et al. The measurements of sacroiliac joint stiffness with colour Doppler imaging: A study on healthy subjects. European Journal of Radiology 1995; 21: 117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cyriax J. Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine. London: Cassell; 1954
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Damen L, Stijnen T, Roebroeck ME et al. Reliability of sacroiliac joint laxity measurement with Doppler imaging of vibrations. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 2002; 28: 407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dreyfuss P, Dryer S, Griffin J et al. Positive sacroiliac screening tests in asymptomatic adults. Spine 1994; 19 (10) 1138-1143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hodges PW. Changes in motor planning of feedforward postural responses of the trunk muscles in low back pain. Experimental Brain Research 2001; 141: 261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hodges PW. Neuromechanical control of the spine. PhD thesis. Karolinska Institute, Stockholm; 2003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hodges PW, Cholewicki JJ. Functional control of the spine. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Stoeckart R, editors Movement, Stability & Lumbopelvic Pain. 2nd edn. Elsevier; 2007: 489
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Hodges PW, Moseley GL. Pain and motor control of the lumbopelvic region: Effect and possible mechanisms. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 2003; 13: 361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hodges PW, van Dieen JH, Cholewicki J. Introduction: Convergence and divergence of opinion on spinal control. In: Hodges PW, van Dieen JH, Cholewicki J, eds. Spinal control: The rehabilitation of back pain. State of the art and science. Elsevier; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Hodges P. Evidence of altered lumbopelvic muscle recruitment in the presence of sacroiliac joint pain. Spine 2003; 28 (14) 1593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Lee D. Alteration of pelvic bone motion determined in subjects with posterior pelvic pain using skin markers. Clinical Biomechanics 2004; 19: 456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Moran M et al. Evaluation of the reliability of therapists to palpate intra-pelvic motion using the stork test on the support side. J Phys Therapy 2007; 87 (7) 879
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jacob HAC, Kissling RO. The mobility of the sacroiliac joints in healthy volunteers between 20 and 50 years of age. Clinical Biomechanics 1995; 10 (7) 352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lee D. The Pelvic Girdle. 1st–4th editions Elsevier; 1989, 1999, 2004, 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Lee D. Highlights from an integrated approach to the treatment of pelvic pain and dysfunction. In: Magee DJ, Zachazewski JE, Quillen WS, et al. eds. Pathology and intervention in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2015. (at press)
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Maitland GD. Vertebral Manipulation. 5th ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 1986
    Google Scholar
  • 18 McGill SM, Grenier S, Kavcic N et al. Coordination of muscle activity to assure stability of the lumbar spine. J Electromyography & Kinesiology 2003; 13: 353
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mens JMA, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ et al. The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints. European Spine 2003; 8: 468
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mens JM, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ et al. Validity of the active straight leg raise test for measuring disease severity in patients with posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy. Spine 2002; 27 (2) 196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 O’Sullivan PB, Beales DJ, Beetham JA et al. Altered motor control strategies in subjects with sacroiliac joint pain during the active straight-leg-raise test. Spine 2002; 27: E1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I: Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. Journal of Spinal Disorders 1992; a 5 (4) 383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. Journal of Spinal Disorders 1992; b 5 (4) 390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Panjabi MM et al. Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 2000; 25 (8) 947
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Polzhofer GK et al. Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic low back pain. Spine 2001; 26 (7) 724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Reeves NP, Cholewicki J. Spine systems science: A primer on the systems approach. In: Hodges PW, van Dieen JH, Cholewicki J, eds. Spinal control: The rehabilitation of back pain. State of the art and science. Elsevier; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Reeves NP, Narendra KS, Cholewicki J. Spine stability: The six blind men and the elephant. Clinical Biomechanics 2007; 22 (3) 266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sturesson B. Load and movement of the sacroiliac joint. PhD thesis. Lund University, Sweden; 1999
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sturesson B, Selvik G, Uden A. Movements of the sacroiliac joints: A Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine 1989; 14 (2) 162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sturesson B, Uden A, Vleeming A. A radiosteriometric analysis of movements of the sacroiliac joints during the standing hip flexion test. Spine 2000; 25 (3) 364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 van der Wurff P, Hagmeijer R, Meyne W. Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. A systematic methodological review: Part 1: Reliability. Manual Therapy 2000; 5 (1) 30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 van Wingerden JP, Vleeming A, Buyruk HM et al. Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint in vivo: Verification of muscular contribution to force closure of the pelvis. European Spine Journal 2004; 13 (3) 199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Vleeming A, Buyruk H, Stoechart R et al. An integrated therapy for peripartum pelvic instability: A study of the biomechanical effects of pelvic belts. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992; 166 (4) 1243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT et al. The sacroiliac joint: An overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. Journal of Anatomy 2012; 221 (6) 537-567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, Volkers ACW et al. Relation between form and function in the sacroiliac joint. 1: Clinical anatomical aspects. Spine 1990; a 15 (2) 130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Vleeming A, Volkers ACW, Snijders CJ et al. Relation between form and function in the sacroiliac joint. 2: Biomechanical aspects. Spine 1990; b 15 (2) 133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC et al. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. European Spine 2008; 17 (6) 794
    PubMedGoogle Scholar