Der intraorale Scan von Implantaten auf Basis eines Scanbody – Eine Übersicht über Machbarkeit und Grenzen aktueller Systematiken

Der intraorale Scan gilt heute in der konventionellen Prothetik als ein verlässlicher und eingeführter Arbeitsablauf. In der Implantatprothetik wird die Digitalisierung fast ausschließlich im Stadium der Modellsituation durchgeführt. Hierbei muss aber der konventionelle Ablauf der intraoralen Abformung mittels Abformpfosten und die sich daran anschließende Modellherstellung weiterhin gegangen werden. Die digitale Umsetzung erfolgt hier nur zur Generierung von CAD/CAM-basierten individuellen Abutments und eventuellem Zahnersatz. Eine Optimierung findet somit nur im Bereich des Designs und der Herstellung des Abutments statt.

• Literatur

• 1 van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D et al. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in digital workflow of implantology. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e43312
• 2 Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013; 16: 11-21
• 3 Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F et al. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17 (Suppl. 01) 54-64
• 4 Nayyar N, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E. Using digitally coded healing abutments and an intraoral scanner to fabricate implant-supported, cement-retained restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109: 210-215
• 5 Joda T, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital implant impressions with the “Individualized Scanbody Technique” for emergence profile support. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 395-397
• 6 Engelschalk M. Intraoral scan with 3M True Deinition, realization with CARES. Starget 2014; 1: 54-57
• 7 Koutouzis T, Koutouzis G, Gadalla H et al. The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: a short-term randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28: 807-814
• 8 Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. One abutment at one time: non-removal of an immediate abutment and ist effect on bone healing around subcrestal tapered implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 1303-1307
• 9 Giménez B, Ozcan M, Martínez-Rus F et al. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17 (Suppl. 01) e54-e64
• 10 Flügge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K et al. Precision of intraoral digital impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 471-478
• 11 Hwang Y, Park Y, Kim H et al. The evaluation of working casts prepared from digital impressions. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 655-662
• 12 Akyalcin S, Cozad BE, English JD et al. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 916-922
• 13 Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L et al. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow – the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 2119-2125
• 14 Scotti R, Cardelli P, Baldissara P et al. Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2011; [withdrawn]
• 15 Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D et al. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010; 38: 553-559
• 16 Joda T, Brägger U. Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 1304-1306
• 17 Akyalcin S, Cozad BE, English JD et al. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 916-922
• 18 Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M et al. Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 1113-1118
• 19 Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ et al. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111: 186-194