Open Access
Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery 2015; 34(02): 134-138
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1554898
Review Article | Artigo de Revisão
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Radial Medial Head Triceps Branch Transfer to Axillary Nerve by Axillary Approach

Acesso ao nervo axilar por via axilar anterior
José Marcos Pondé
1   Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
,
Lazaro Santos
2   Bahian School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
,
João Pedro Magalhaes
2   Bahian School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
,
Ana Flavia D'Álmeida
2   Bahian School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Address for correspondence

José Marcos Pondé, MD, PhD
Av. Paulo VI, 111, Pituba, Salvador, BA
Brazil 41810-000

Publication History

06 June 2014

31 March 2015

Publication Date:
29 June 2015 (online)

 

Abstract

Objective To describe axillary approach for axillary nerve transfer with radial nerve branch in brachial plexus lesions.

Methods Six patients aged 24 to 54 (mean 30) years with traumatic superior trunk brachial plexus injury underwent axillary approach between October 2011 and April 2012. On physical examination prior to surgery, they could not perform shoulder abduction, external rotation, or elbow flexion. Surgical approach was made through axillary pathway without any muscular section. The transfer was done with the radial branch to the medial head of triceps. In addition to transfer to axillary nerve, each patient had spinal accessory nerve transferred to suprascapular nerve and ulnar nerve fascicle transferred to musculocutaneous nerve.

Conclusion The axillary approach allows easy access to axillary nerve and, therefore, is a feasible pathway to transferences involving this nerve.


Resumo

Objetivo Apresentar via axilar por transferência de nervo axilar com ramo de nervo radial em lesões do plexus braquial.

Métodos Seis pacientes com idade entre 24 e 54 anos (média de 30) com lesão braquial traumática do plexus no tronco superior submetidos a via axilar entre outubro de 2011 e abril de 2012. Em exame físico pré-cirúrgico, não foram capazes de executar abdução do ombro, rotação externa, ou flexão do cotovelo. Abordagem cirúrgica foi realizada por passagem axilar sem qualquer seção muscular. A transferência ocorreu com o ramo radial do tríceps medial da cabeça. Somada à transferência ao nervo axilar, cada paciente teve nervo acessório espinhal transferido para o nervo supraescapular, e o fascículo do nervo ulnar transferido para o nervo musculocutâneo.

Conclusão A via axilar facilita acesso ao nervo axilar e, por isso, é um caminho factível para transferências envolvendo este nervo.


Introduction

Restoration of shoulder function is one of the most critical goals of treatment of brachial plexus injuries. Primary repair or nerve grafting for avulsion injuries of the upper brachial plexus in adults often leads to poor recovery. Nerve transfers have provided an alternative treatment with great potential for improved return of function. Many different nerves have been utilized as donor nerves for transfer to the suprascapular nerve and axillary nerve for return of shoulder function with variable results. This article presents a straightforward access to the axillary nerve by means of an unusual route combined with Oberlin surgery.

Usually the approach for transference of the axillary nerve is made by means of the posterior route to transfer a branch of the radial nerve to it.

This implies in case of the necessity in the same surgery to make the transference of the musculocutaneous nerve with an ulnar fascicle (Oberlin surgery) to make a second incision, invariably turning the side of the arm and sometimes the position of the patient.

During the axillary approach this is not necessary because the same incision can be undertaken.


Method

From October 2011 to April 2012, six men aged 24 to 54 years (mean 30) with traumatic brachial plexus injury underwent nerve transfer through anterior axillary approach. The patients were clinically and electrophysiologically evaluated; with nerve root injury confirmed in the right shoulder (four patients) and left shoulder (two patients).They had impaired shoulder abduction, external rotation, and elbow flexion. All patients had at least a grade 4 muscle strength in the triceps ([Table 1]).

Table 1

Patients muscle strength grade in triceps

Patient no.

Age (y)

Side involved

Interval from injury to surgery (mo)

Follow-up (mo)

Additional nerve transfers

Mechanism of injury

Abduction (degree)

Follow-up (mo)

1

24

R

9

2

Ac.-S.S, Oberlin

Motorcycle

120

24

2

24

R

7

5

Ac.-S.S, Oberlin

Motorcycle

120

18

3

25

L

6

3

Ac.-S.S, Oberlin

Motorcycle

120

18

4

28

L

12

2

Ac.-S.S, Oberlin

Motorcycle

90

22

5

32

R

3

6

Ac.-S.S, Oberlin

Motorcycle

30

18

6

54

R

6

2

Ac.-S.S, Oberlin

Bike

90

18

The mean time from injury to surgery was 6 months, ranging from 3 to 12 months.

Six patients with traumatic superior trunk lesion were treated with connection of a fascicle of ulnar nerve to musculocutaneous nerve (Oberlin surgery), accessory to suprascapular nerve connection, and connection of the radial branch to the medial portion of triceps to anterior axillary branch.

The approach to the suprascapular nerve was made in the supraclavicular region with a transverse incision 2 cm above the clavicle and dissection of the superior trunk. The accessory spinal nerve was transferred in all cases to the suprascapular nerve.

The approach to the musculocutaneous nerve was made in the superior medial third of the arm with connection of a fascicle of the ulnar nerve with the biceps branch of the receptor nerve.

Under general anesthesia the patients were placed in supine position with the arm abducted and externally rotated. A longitudinal incision of approximately 10 to 15 cm in length was made along a line falling inferiorly to the biceps muscle until reaching the border of pectoral major muscle ([Fig 1]). Dissection was performed carefully, leaving the vascular and neural structures laterally to expose the quadrangular space, which is limited downward by the latissimus dorsi and teres major muscles, upward by the teres minor muscle, laterally by the humerus, and medially by the triceps muscle.

Zoom
Fig. 1 Incision in the arm.

The posterior circumflex artery is isolated, and the axillary nerve beside it, identified. Both nerves' branches to the medial head of the triceps are isolated, running closely adjacent to the radial nerve although distinctly separated from it. The radial nerve was dissected while the upper motor branch to the medial head triceps was individualized and stimulated electrically for proper identification ([Fig 2]). It was sectioned and sutured to the anterior division of the axillary nerve under magnification with 10-0 nylon and fibrin glue.

Zoom
Fig. 2 Surgical approach with the axillary nerve in the left side (A), the branch of the radial to the medial head of triceps (M), and the radial nerve (R).

In one patient, a connection between the medial portion of the radial nerve and the entire axillary trunk was performed, because the donor nerve was very thicken.

The patients were discharged home after 2 days of surgery.


Results

Palpable contraction of deltoid muscle was noted in all patients 4 months after surgery.

One patient had subcutaneous infection. He was treated with antibiotics and surgical debridement with good outcome.

Following a mean of 14 to 18 months after the surgery, all patients except 1 showed improvement in abduction of the arm above 90 degrees. Deltoid strength was M4 in all patients. Only two patients acquired external rotation of 30 and 45 degrees.


Discussion

Disruption of the C5 and C6 roots results in loss of supply to muscles innervated by the suprascapular nerve, axillary nerve, and musculocutaneous nerve. With particular regard to shoulder abduction, it is not uncommon for the axillary nerve (C5, C6) component of the posterior cord to be compromised, whereas the radial nerve (C5, C6, C7, C8, T1) component remains intact because of its more plentiful nerve root sources.[1]

In cases of lesions of the upper trunk, there are usually three options: arthrodesis, nerve transfer, and tendon transfer. Arthrodesis sacrifices abduction, otherwise providing stability of the shoulder.

Satisfactory results are obtained with trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, levator scapulae, and latissimus dorsi transfer, but local nerve transfers are preferred to avoid biomechanical alterations.[2] [3] The main priorities in nerve transfer are elbow flexion and arm abduction.[4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Procedures have used donors to axillary nerve from the intercostal nerves[9] [10] thoracodorsal nerve,[10] medial pectoral nerve,[10] [11] long thoracic nerve,[10] phrenic nerve,[9] distal accessory nerve,[9] ipsilateral C7 root,[12] contralateral C7,[13] suprascapular nerve,[14] and hypoglossal nerve.[15] Usually, the transfer of radial branches to axillary nerve are carried out by means of the posterior approach with an incision between the deltoid and triceps.[1]

The anterior approach was described using the deltopectoral groove pathway[15] with few reports of transaxillary approach.[16] The section of muscle can be necessary in both usually described surgical approaches. In the anterior approach, the minor pectoralis muscle is sectioned closely to the coracoid process to access the infraclavicular plexus. In the posterior approach, the incision is made in the posterolateral surface of the arm and sometimes is necessary to proceed the section of teres major muscle increasing the quadrangular space for a better nerve cooptation between the radial branch and the axillary nerve.[1] [8] Consequently the axillary approach is a straightforward access to the axillary region without any muscular section.

A natural route across the armpit is done, improving the quality of this approach, with less tissue aggression. The radial nerve branch to the medial portion of the triceps is sectioned the more distant as possible, bringing it in the opposite direction upward the axillary nerve. The connection is carried out without any tension. We attended the policy of bringing more proximal as possible the receptor nerve and leaving more distant as possible the donor nerve.

All the patients operated upon by this approach were also submitted to Oberlin technique[17] and spinal accessory to suprascapular transfer. To suprascapular reinnervation, another incision should be made usually in the supraclavicular lesion or over the scapulae in the posterior approach.

When the Oberlin surgery is not intended, we usually prefer the posterior approach, following the scientists' recommendation.[17] [18]

An anatomical study previously done showed the feasibility of the proceeding and the same authors operated upon three patients by means of this technique.[16]

Eighteen months after surgery, all three patients had recovered deltoid strength to a score of M4 on the Medical Research Council scale and had improved abduction strength by 50%.[16]

Reinnervation of suprascapular nerve alone seems to yield better results than reinnervation of the axillary nerve in the same situation.[1]

Both approaches work with the objective of reinnervating the supraspinatus and deltoid muscle, respectively.

Leechavengvongs et al[18] believe that the difference in the results between suprascapular and axillary nerve transfer may be because that nerve transfer to the axillary nerve always requires a longer nerve graft than that is necessary to accessory-suprascapular nerve cooptation.

In our opinion, this is a matter of discussion because similar results of reinnervation of suprascapular nerve were obtained through an anterior supraclavicular approach or a posterior approach with different distances to the end motor plaque.

In the paper of Jerome that describes an approach across the deltopectoral groove, a longer distance between the radial branch and the axillary nerve than in the posterior approach, the mean value of abduction was 133 degrees.

Many authors report good results with double transfers.[9] [11] [17] [18] [19]

Nath and Mackinnon[20] called attention to a favorable outcome of a motor transfer nerve like the use of the radial branch to the triceps for the following reasons:

  1. Proximity to neuromuscular junction of the deltoid muscle

  2. Negligible deficit of function following donor nerve section

  3. Pure motor donor nerve

  4. It has many axons

  5. Synergistic function

Some authors argue that the long portion of the triceps contributes substantially to the shoulder joint physiology. The long head of the triceps is generally the largest of the three, and in contrast to the other two heads, it provides some stability of humeroscapular adduction as it originates from the infraglenoid tubercle of the scapula. This is why Mackinnon et al prefer the medial branch instead of long head branch.

Neither sections of the medial or lateral or long head motor branch decrease muscle strength.[4] [18] [21]

According to Zhang and Nuber the uniarticular triceps lateral and medial heads contribute 70 to 90% to isometric elbow extension. The anconeus contributes 15% at lesser degrees of elbow extension. The long head becomes active only with forceful elbow extension.[22] [23]

According to Bertelli et al,[16] the triceps long head function is dependent on shoulder position and that is particularly active when the shoulder is fully abducted. Their preference is to use the long head motor branch.

The is no consensus regarding what division of the axillary nerve must be reinnervated. The anterior branch contains all fibers that innervate the anterior and middle deltoid muscle. The posterior branch contains fibers that supply the posterior deltoid in 90% of cases.[18] Nerve fibers to the teres minor and cutaneous sensory fibers are also found in the posterior branch.

External shoulder rotation is a critical element of function and an important goal of reconstruction. The teres minor provides two important functions: glenohumeral capsular stability and external rotation. After crossing the quadrangular space, two branches of the axillary nerve are soon individualized, one to deltoid muscle and the other to teres minor muscle. Given the importance of the innervated muscle by the teres minor for shoulder stability and external rotation, Mackinnon at al include teres minor in the reconstructive effort.


Conclusion

The axillary approach described herein is a safe and reliable route to surgery for axillary nerve transfer in brachial plexus injury. Our primary indication is an attempt to do simultaneously transference of ulnar to musculocutaneous nerve in the arm, using the same incision.




Address for correspondence

José Marcos Pondé, MD, PhD
Av. Paulo VI, 111, Pituba, Salvador, BA
Brazil 41810-000


Zoom
Fig. 1 Incision in the arm.
Zoom
Fig. 2 Surgical approach with the axillary nerve in the left side (A), the branch of the radial to the medial head of triceps (M), and the radial nerve (R).