Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000026.xml
Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2015; 47(02): 80-85
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1550004
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1550004
Übersichtsartikel
Therapieentscheidung bei Klasse-I-Borderline-Fällen: Extraktion versus Non-Extraktion
Therapeutic Decision in Class I Borderline Cases: Extraction vs. Non-ExtractionFurther Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
03 July 2015 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Die Entscheidung zur Extraktionstherapie bei Klasse-I-Grenzfällen ist oft sehr schwierig zu treffen bzw. wird von verschiedenen Faktoren beeinflusst.
In dieser Arbeit werden mittels Literaturrecherche unterschiedliche Aspekte zur Extraktionstherapie dargestellt. Dabei werden die häufigsten Extraktionsgründe und Extraktionsmuster, das Auftreten von Wurzelresorptionen, Behandlungserfolge, Zahnbogenveränderungen sowie der Einfluss einer Extraktionstherapie auf die Dauer der Behandlung, der Kondylenposition, mögliche Profil- und Weichteilveränderungen diskutiert. Auch der Zusammenhang zwischen Extraktionstherapie und der Impaktierung von Weisheitszähnen, der Stabilität und des Auftretens eines Frontzahnrezidivs wird erläutert.
Abstract
The decision for an extraction treatment in Class I borderline cases is sometimes difficult and is influenced by many factors.
In this review article different aspects of extraction treatment are presented. The most frequent reasons will be discussed, as well as the occurrence of root resorptions, success of treatment, dental arch changes, influence of extraction on the duration of orthodontic treatment, condylar position and effects on profile and soft tissue changes. Moreover the relation between extraction treatment and third molar impaction rate, stability and the tendency of incisor relapse is explained.
-
Literatur
- 1 Verma SL, Sharma VP, Tandon P et al. Comparison of esthetic outcome after extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion patients. Contemp Clin Dent 2013; 4: 206-212
- 2 Carey CW. Diagnosis and case analysis in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1952; 38: 149-161
- 3 Xu TM, Liu Y, Yang MZ et al. Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 672-677
- 4 Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Orthodontic treatment planning: From problem list to specific plan, in Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. Mosby; St. Louis: 2012. 220-275
- 5 Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd R et al. The decision to extract: Part 1-Interclinician agreement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109: 297-309
- 6 Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth and fractures of the maxilla, Angle’s system. 7th ed. Philadelphia: SS White Dental Mfg.Co.; 1907
- 7 Proffit WR. Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 407-414
- 8 Peck S, Peck H. Frequency of tooth extraction in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 491-496
- 9 Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C et al. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 462-466
- 10 Turpin DL. Percentage swings in extraction frequencies. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 403
- 11 Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd R et al. The decision to extract: Part II. Analysis of clinicians stated reason for extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109: 393-402
- 12 Konstantonis D, Anthopoulou C, Makou M. Extraction decision and identification of treatment predictors in Class I malocclusions. Progr Orthod 2013; 14: 47
- 13 Fleischer-Peters A. Therapieplanung bei Engstand unter Berücksichtigung der Wachstumssituation. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1980; 41: 385-393
- 14 Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 585-599
- 15 Hirschfelder U, Boulouchou O, Müssig D et al. Einfluß des Wachstumstyps auf das Behandlungsresultat nach Extraktionstherapie. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1997; 58: 154-164
- 16 Lin CH, Short LL, Banding DW. The effects of non-extraction treatment on the vertical dimension: a comparison of a dolichofacial and a mesofacial group. Aust Orthod J 2012; 28: 37-43
- 17 Kumari M, Fida M. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010; 20: 17-21
- 18 Janson G, Maria FR, Bombonatti R. Frequency evaluation of different extraction protocols in orthodontic treatment during 35 years. Prog Orthod 2014; 15: 51
- 19 Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE. Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment:
a systemic review. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 386-395
MissingFormLabel
- 20 Leon-Salazar R, Janson G, Henriques JFC et al. Influence of initial occlusal severity on time and efficiency of Class I malocclusion treatment carried out with and without premolar extractions. Dental Press J Orthod 2014; 19: 38-49
- 21 Jung YH, Cho BH. External root resorption after orthodontic treatment: a study of contributing factors. Imaging Science in Dentistry 2011; 41: 17-21
- 22 Linge L, Linge BO. Patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 35-43
- 23 Sharpe W, Reed B, Subtelny JD et al. Orthodontic relapse, apical root resorption, and crestal alveolar bone levels. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91: 252-258
- 24 Ileri Z, Basciftci FA, Malkoc S et al. Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments. Eur J Orthod 2012; 681-685
- 25 Freitas KM, Freitas DS, Valarelli FP et al. PAR evaluation of treated Class I extraction patients. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 270-274
- 26 Janson G, Nakamura A, Barros SE et al. Efficiency of Class I and Class II malocclusion treatment with four premolar extractions. Journal of Applied Oral Science [online]
- 27 Artun J, Osterberg SK. Periodontal status of teeth facing extraction sites long-term after orthodontic treatment. J Periodontol 1987; 58: 24-29
- 28 Türköz Ç, Ulusoy Ç. Effect of premolar extraction on mandibular third molar impaction in young adults. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 572-577
- 29 Kim TW, Årtun J, Behbehani F et al. Prevalence of third molar impaction in orthodontic patients treated nonextraction and with extracton of 4 premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 138-145
- 30 Tarazona B, Parades V, Llamas JM et al. Influence of first and second premolar extraction or non-extraction treatments on mandibular third molar angulation and position. A comparative study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: e760-e766
- 31 Gianelly AA, Cozzani M, Boffa J. Condylar position and maxillary first premolar extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 473-476
- 32 Årtun J, Hollender LG, Truelove EL. Relationship between orthodontic treatment, condylar position, and internal derangement in the temporomandibular joint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 101: 48-53
- 33 Major P, Kamelchuk L, Nebbe B et al. Condyle displacement associated with premolar extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment of class I malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 112: 435-440
- 34 Rinchuse DJ, Busch LS, DiBagno D et al. Extraction Treatment Part1 The Extraction vs. Nonextraction debate. J Clin Orthod 2014; 48: 753-760
- 35 Dibbets JMH, van der Weele LT. Extraction, orthodontic treatment, and craniomandibular dysfunction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 210-219
- 36 Basciftci FA, Usumez S. Effects of Extraction and Nonextraction Treatment on Class I and Class II Subjects. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 36-42
- 37 Stephens CK, Boley JC, Behrents RG et al. Long-term profile changes in extraction
and nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 450-457
MissingFormLabel
- 38 Conley RS, Jernigan C. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 59-65
- 39 Erdinc AE, Nanda RS, Dandajena TC. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 324-331
- 40 Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in „borderline“ class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 102: 1-14
- 41 Bowman SJ, Johnston LE. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatment
on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 3-10
MissingFormLabel
- 42 Konstantonis D. The impact of extraction vs. nonextraction on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 209-217
- 43 Johnson DK, Smith R. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 162-167
- 44 Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The gingival smile line. Angle Orthod 1992; 62: 91-100
- 45 Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Some vertical lineaments of lip positon. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 519-524
- 46 Mack MR. Vertical dimension: a dynamic concept based on facial form and oropharyngeal function. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 478-485
- 47 Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 132-144
- 48 Aksu M, Kocadereli I. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 948-952
- 49 Strang R. The fallacy of denture expansion. Angle Orthod 1949; 19: 12-17
- 50 Riedel RA. Review of the retention problem. Angle Orthod 1960; 6: 179-199
- 51 Weinberg M, Sadowsky C. Resolution of mandibular arch crowding in growing patients with Class I malocclusions treated nonextraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 359-364
- 52 Glenn G, Sinclair PM, Alexander RG. Nonextraction orthodontic therapy: posttreatment dental and skeletal stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 92: 321-328
- 53 Boley JC, Mark JA, Sachdeva RC et al. Longterm stability of Class I premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 277-287
- 54 Picanço PR, Valarelli FP, Cançado RH et al. Comparison of the changes of alveolar bone thickness in maxillary incisor area in extraction and non-extraction cases: computerized tomography evaluation. Dental Press J Orthod 2013; 18: 91-98
- 55 Germec-Cakan D, Taner TU, Akan S. Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline class I malocclusion treated with extraction or without extraction with air-rotor stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 734.e1-734.e7
- 56 Little RM, Wallen TR, Riedel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 349-365
- 57 Little RM, Riedel RA, Årtun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 93: 423-428
- 58 Little RM, Riedel RA, Engst ED. Serial extraction of first premolars – postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1990; 60: 255-262
- 59 Little RM, Riedel RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase in the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 97: 393-404
- 60 Zafarmand AH, Qamari A, Zafarmand MM. Mandibular incisor re-crowding: is it different in extraction and non-extraction cases?. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014; 13: 669-674
- 61 Freitas KM, des Freitas MR, Henriques JF et al. Postretention relapse of mandibular anterior crowding in patients treated without mandibular premolar extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 480-487
- 62 Canuto LFG, Freitas MR, Freitas KMS et al. Long-term stability of maxillary anterior alignment in non-extraction cases. Dental Press J Orthod 2013; 18: 46-53
- 63 Canuto LF, de Freitas MR, Janson G et al. Influence of rapid expansion on maxillary incisor alignment stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 164.e1-164.e6