J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76(06): 426-431
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549001
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Easy and Safe Method for Facial Nerve Identification in Parotid Surgery

Shawn T. Joseph
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
Shetty Sharankumar
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
C.J. Sandya
2   Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
Vidhyadharan Sivakumar
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
Peter Sherry
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
Thankappan Krishnakumar
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
,
Iyer Subramania
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

10 May 2014

26 January 2015

Publication Date:
29 May 2015 (online)

Abstract

Background A safe and easy anatomical landmark is proposed to identify the facial nerve in parotid surgery. The facial nerve forms the center point between the base of the styloid process and the origin of the posterior belly of the digastric muscle.

Objective To evaluate the consistency, accuracy, and safety of the landmark in identifying the facial nerve.

Methods The study was designed in three steps: a cadaver study, a radiologic study, and a prospective clinical study. Anatomy was initially studied in two cadavers. Then the images of 200 temporal styloid regions were studied for consistency of the presence of the styloid base. In the second part of the radiologic study, the distance between the styloid base and the origin of the posterior belly of the digastric muscle was studied in 50 parotid regions. The clinical study involved 25 patients who underwent parotidectomy.

Results The styloid base was present in all the images studied. The mean distance between the styloid base and the origin of the posterior belly of the digastric was found to be 0.72 cm (range: 0.45–0.99 cm). The facial nerve could be identified consistently and safely in all patients.

Conclusion This trident landmark provided safe, accurate, and easy identification of the facial nerve using two fixed bony landmarks.

 
  • References

  • 1 de Ru JA, van Benthem PP, Bleys RL, Lubsen H, Hordijk GJ. Landmarks for parotid gland surgery. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115 (2) 122-125
  • 2 Pather N, Osman M. Landmarks of the facial nerve: implications for parotidectomy. Surg Radiol Anat 2006; 28 (2) 170-175
  • 3 Tabb HG, Scalco AN, Fraser SF. Exposure of the facial nerve in parotid surgery. (Use of the tympanomastoid fissure as a guide). Laryngoscope 1970; 80 (4) 559-567
  • 4 Beahrs OH. The surgical anatomy and technique of parotidectomy. Surg Clin North Am 1977; 57 (3) 477-493
  • 5 Gray H. Anatomy of the Human Body. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1918; Bartleby.com; 2000
  • 6 de Ru JA, Bleys RL, van Benthem PP, Hordijk GJ. Preoperative determination of the location of parotid gland tumors by analysis of the position of the facial nerve. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59 (5) 525-528 ; discussion 529–530
  • 7 Trible WM. Symposium: management of tumors of the parotid gland. III. Management of the facial nerve. Laryngoscope 1976; 86 (1) 25-27
  • 8 Balcioglu HA, Kilic C, Akyol M, Ozan H, Kokten G. Length of the styloid process and anatomical implications for Eagle's syndrome. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2009; 68 (4) 265-270
  • 9 Conley J, Hamaker RC. Prognosis of malignant tumors of the parotid gland with facial paralysis. Arch Otolaryngol 1975; 101 (1) 39-41
  • 10 Upile T, Jerjes W, Nouraei SA , et al. The stylomastoid artery as an anatomical landmark to the facial nerve during parotid surgery: a clinico-anatomic study. World J Surg Oncol 2009; 7: 71
  • 11 Witt RL. Facial nerve function after partial superficial parotidectomy: an 11-year review (1987–1997). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 121 (3) 210-213
  • 12 Nishida M, Matsuura H. A landmark for facial nerve identification during parotid surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51 (4) 451-453
  • 13 Browne HJ. Exposure of the facial nerve. Br J Surg 1988; 75 (7) 724-725
  • 14 Conn IG, Wiesenfeld D, Ferguson MM. The anatomy of the facial nerve in relation to CT/sialography of the parotid gland. Br J Radiol 1983; 56 (672) 901-905
  • 15 Pereira JA, Merí A, Potau JM, Prats-Galino A, Sancho JJ, Sitges-Serra A. A simple method for safe identification of the facial nerve using palpable landmarks. Arch Surg 2004; 139 (7) 745-747 ; discussion 748
  • 16 Greyling LM, Glanvill R, Boon JM , et al. Bony landmarks as an aid for intraoperative facial nerve identification. Clin Anat 2007; 20 (7) 739-744