Wie zuverlässig werden der vestibuläre und der orale Alveolarfortsatz im Volumentomogramm dargestellt?

Frage

Wie zuverlässig werden der vestibuläre und der orale Alveolarfortsatz im Volumentomogramm dargestellt?

• Literatur

• 1 Halazonetis DJ. Cone-beam computed tomography is not the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 403 405, 407
• 2 SEDENTEXCT project. Radiation protection: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines 2011 Verfügbar unter http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/guidelines_final.pdf Aufgerufen am 3. Nov. 2014
• 3 American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology . Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116: 238-257
• 4 Patcas R, Müller L, Ullrich O et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 41-50
• 5 Schulze R, Heil U, Groß D et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 265-273
• 6 Molen AD. Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137 (4 Suppl): S130-S135
• 7 Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review. J Digit Imaging 2013; 26: 813-820
• 8 Wood R, Sun Z, Chaudhry J et al. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 353-363
• 9 Bryant JA, Drage NA, Richmond S. Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 365-374
• 10 Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S et al. Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 829-836
• 11 Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E et al. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 573-582
• 12 Watanabe H, Honda E, Tetsumura A et al. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77: 397-402
• 13 Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Stamatakis H et al. SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 114: 127-135
• 14 Bamba J, Araki K, Endo A et al. Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20120445
• 15 Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R et al. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137 (4 Suppl): S109-S119
• 16 Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T et al. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 734-744
• 17 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
• 18 Larato DC. Alveolar plate fenestrations and dehiscences of the human skull. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970; 29: 816-819
• 19 Davies RM, Downer MC, Hull PS et al. Alveolar defects in human skulls. J Clin Periodontol 1974; 1: 107-111
• 20 Rupprecht RD, Horning GM, Nicoll BK et al. Prevalence of dehiscences and fenestrations in modern American skulls. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 722-729
• 21 Nimigean VR, Nimigean V, Bencze MA et al. Alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations: an anatomical study and review. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2009; 50: 391-397