Int J Angiol 2016; 25(05): e106-e107
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1395988
Case Report
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Arteria Lusoria and Superdominant Right Coronary Artery: Two Rare Arterial Anomalies Diagnosed during Transradial Coronary Catheterization

Miloslav Spacek
1   Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Motol, 2nd Medical School, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
,
David Zemanek
1   Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Motol, 2nd Medical School, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
,
Josef Veselka
1   Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Motol, 2nd Medical School, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 April 2015 (online)

Abstract

We present a case report of two rare arterial anomalies diagnosed during transradial coronary catheterization—arteria lusoria (aberrant right subclavian artery) and superdominant right coronary artery. Importantly, these anomalies may cause difficulty in performance or interpretation of catheterization procedure, especially in urgent situation and with wide acceptance of transradial approach. To the best of our knowledge, the combination of these anomalies has never been described in the literature.

 
  • References

  • 1 De Luca L, Bergman JJ, Tytgat GN, Fockens P. EUS imaging of the arteria lusoria: case series and review. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52 (5) 670-673
  • 2 Abhaichand RK, Louvard Y, Gobeil JF, Loubeyre C, Lefèvre T, Morice MC. The problem of arteria lusoria in right transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 54 (2) 196-201
  • 3 Yamanaka O, Hobbs RE. Coronary artery anomalies in 126,595 patients undergoing coronary arteriography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990; 21 (1) 28-40
  • 4 Amoroso G, Monni E, Limbruno U , et al. Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in a patient with a solitary coronary ostium and a “superdominant” right coronary artery. Int J Cardiol 2005; 99 (3) 473-476