Präparation für Keramik-Inlays mittels oszillierender Instrumente

Bereits vor einigen Jahren wurden oszillierende Präparationsinstrumente als Alternative zu rotierenden Instrumenten entwickelt. Die Zielsetzung für dieses neue System lag in einer Verbesserung der Präparationstechnik für indirekte und direkte Restaurationen. Tatsächlich berichten zahlreiche Publikationen von praktischen Vorteilen und verbesserter Präparationsqualität. Dieses Wissen hat die Praxen aber bisher nur teilweise erreicht. Der nachfolgende Beitrag zielt darauf ab, hier eine Lücke zu schließen und aus der Sicht eines jungen Kollegen das Potenzial dieser Technologie für die Praxis und die eigene Behandlungstätigkeit aufzuzeigen.

• Literatur

• 1 Kois DE, Isvilanonda V, Chaiyabutr Y et al. Evaluation of fracture resistance and failure risks of posterior partial coverage restorations. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2013; 25: 110-122
• 2 Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY et al. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Operative dentistry 2001; 26: 357-366
• 3 Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Appelt A et al. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity. Dental materials 2011; 27: 892-898
• 4 Zarrati S, Mahboub F. Marginal adaptation of indirect composite, glass-ceramic inlays and direct composite: an in vitro evaluation. Journal of dentistry 2010; 7: 77-83
• 5 Edelhoff D, Brix O. All-ceramic restorations in different indications: a case series. Journal of the American Dental Association 2011; 142 (Suppl. 02)
• 6 Frankenberger R, Taschner M, Garcia-Godoy F et al. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. The journal of adhesive dentistry 2008; 10: 393-398
• 7 Arnetzl G. Präparationstechnik für die Vollkeramik – die Materialbeschaffenheit als Grundlage für die Präparationsform. ZMK 2008; 24: 284-292
• 8 Ahlers MO, Morig G, Blunck U et al. Guidelines for the preparation of CAD / CAM ceramic inlays and partial crowns. International journal of computerized dentistry 2009; 12: 309-325
• 9 Pospiech P, Rammelsberg P, Goldhofer G et al. All-ceramic resin-bonded bridges. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis study. European journal of oral sciences 1996; 104: 390-395
• 10 Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC et al. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays. The International journal of prosthodontics 2001; 14: 109-114
• 11 Krejci I, Lutz F, Fullemann J. [Tooth-colored inlays / overlays. Tooth-colored adhesive inlays and overlays: materials, principles and classification]. Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin 1992; 102: 72-83
• 12 Ahlers MO, Hajto J. Optimierte Präparation für Keramikinlays. ZMK 2014; 30: 98-103
• 13 Hugo B. [Oscillating procedures in the preparation technic (I)]. Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin 1999; 109: 140-160
• 14 Lussi A, Gygax M. Iatrogenic damage to adjacent teeth during classical approximal box preparation. Journal of dentistry 1998; 26: 435-441
• 15 Moopnar M, Faulkner KD. Accidental damage to teeth adjacent to crown-prepared abutment teeth. Australian dental journal 1991; 36: 136-140
• 16 Oman CR, Applebaum E. Ultrasonic cavity preparation. II. Progress report. Journal of the American Dental Association 1955; 50: 414-417
• 17 Postle HH. Ultrasonic Cavity Preparation. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1958; 8: 153-160
• 18 Hugo B. [Oscillating procedures in the preparation technic (II). Their development and application possibilities]. Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin 1999; 109: 269-285
• 19 Ferrari M, Dagostin A, Fabianelli A. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system. Dental materials 2003; 19: 270-276
• 20 Vanderlei AD, Borges AL, Cavalcanti BN et al. Ultrasonic versus high-speed cavity preparation: analysis of increases in pulpal temperature and time to complete preparation. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2008; 100: 107-109
• 21 Renne W, McGill ST, Forshee KV et al. Predicting marginal fit of CAD / CAM crowns based on the presence or absence of common preparation errors. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2012; 108: 310-315
• 22 Ellis R, Bennani V, Purton D et al. The effect of ultrasonic instruments on the quality of preparation margins and bonding to dentin. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2012; 24: 278-285
• 23 Horne P, Bennani V, Chandler N et al. Ultrasonic margin preparation for fixed prosthodontics: a pilot study. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2012; 24: 201-209
• 24 Hugo B, Stassinakis A, Hofmann N et al. Temperaturentwicklung im Dentin bei sonoabrasiver Zahnpräparation in vitro. Acta Med Dent Helv 1999; 4: 125-132
• 25 Arnetzl GV, Arnetzl G. Design of preparations for all-ceramic inlay materials. International journal of computerized dentistry 2006; 9: 289-298
• 26 Arnetzl GV, Arnetzl G. Biomechanical examination of inlay geometries--is there a basic biomechanical principle?. International journal of computerized dentistry 2009; 12: 119-130
• 27 McDonald A. Preparation guidelines for full and partial coverage ceramic restorations. Dental update 2001; 28: 84-90