Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393373
A novel method for endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic rendezvous with a microcatheter
Authors
Corresponding author
Publication History
Publication Date:
26 November 2015 (online)
A 69-year-old woman with chronic pancreatitis and recurrent pancreatic-type abdominal pain underwent computed tomography, which showed dilatation of the pancreatic duct. Subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography revealed a fibrotic papillary stenosis preventing cannulation of the pancreatic duct.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided rendezvous was attempted ([Video 1]). The pancreatic duct was punctured with a 19-gauge needle (Expect; Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA). A 0.025-inch angulated-tip guidewire (VisiGlide; Olympus America, Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA) was then advanced into the pancreatic duct but could not pass through the stenosis to the duodenal lumen. Because of the possible risk for fragmentation of the guidewire during manipulation, the needle was removed and a 150-cm, 3-Fr microcatheter (Renegade Hi-Flo; Boston Scientific) was inserted into the pancreatic duct over the guidewire ([Fig. 1]). The microcatheter was smoothly inserted and easily advanced to the prepapillary area, and the guidewire was removed ([Fig. 2]). Contrast was injected to better define the cephalic duct ([Fig. 3]). A 0.025-inch straight-tip guidewire was inserted through the microcatheter ([Fig. 4]) and after manipulation was advanced through the stenosis into the duodenum ([Fig. 5]). The pancreatic rendezvous was completed, and a 7-Fr pancreatic stent (Advanix; Boston Scientific) was placed ([Fig. 6]).
The complete process of rendezvous with the microcatheter. In the final image, the caliber of the microcatheter is compared with that of a 19-gauge needle.












The success rate for pancreatic rendezvous reaches only 50 % in published series [1]. Manipulation of the guidewire, the most significant limiting factor [2], is hampered by the sharp needle grind, which can block and cut the tip of the guidewire. An enhanced protocol for biliary rendezvous with a 4-Fr catheter has been proposed [3]; however, this is the first report of EUS-guided rendezvous with a 3-Fr microcatheter. The microcatheter, taken from the interventional radiology armamentarium, is thinner than the 19-gauge needle, avoids dilation of the transmural track, and facilitates manipulation of the 0.025-in guidewire, guidewire exchange, and contrast injection. These advantages can improve the success rate of EUS-guided rendezvous.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AD
Competing interests: None
-
References
- 1 Takikawa T, Kanno A, Masamune A et al. Pancreatic duct drainage using EUS-guided rendezvous technique for stenotic pancreaticojejunostomy. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 5182-5186
- 2 Vila JJ, Pérez-Miranda M, Vazquez-Sequeiros E et al. Initial experience with EUS-guided cholangiopancreatography for biliary and pancreatic duct drainage: a Spanish national survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 1133-1141
- 3 Park do H, Jeong SU, Lee BU et al. Prospective evaluation of a treatment algorithm with enhanced guidewire manipulation protocol for EUS-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 91-101
Corresponding author
-
References
- 1 Takikawa T, Kanno A, Masamune A et al. Pancreatic duct drainage using EUS-guided rendezvous technique for stenotic pancreaticojejunostomy. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 5182-5186
- 2 Vila JJ, Pérez-Miranda M, Vazquez-Sequeiros E et al. Initial experience with EUS-guided cholangiopancreatography for biliary and pancreatic duct drainage: a Spanish national survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 1133-1141
- 3 Park do H, Jeong SU, Lee BU et al. Prospective evaluation of a treatment algorithm with enhanced guidewire manipulation protocol for EUS-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 91-101












