Download PDF
Gastroenterologie up2date 2014; 10(04): 279-294
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390924
Endoskopie/Gastrointestinale Radiologie/Sonografie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Ultraschall in der Lehre, ein kleiner Atlas der Echoskopie

Christoph F. Dietrich
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 December 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category
Kernaussagen

Möglichkeiten und Limitationen

  • Die Echoskopie ermöglicht die orientierende Darstellung abdomineller Organe, des Herzens und des Mediastinums.

  • Die Echoskopie ermöglicht eine ausreichend gute Darstellung der Anatomie, insofern es sich nicht um oberflächlich gelegene Strukturen handelt, die einer höherfrequenten Untersuchungstechnik bedürfen.

  • Die Echoskopie ermöglicht keine Diagnostik kleiner umschriebener Organveränderungen und keine Ausschlussdiagnostik.

  • Die Echoskopie ermöglicht aufgrund der kleinen Auflagefläche des Transducers manchmal einen besseren Zugangsweg als größere auch konvex angeordnete Ultraschallköpfe.

  • Ein umfassender EFSUMB-Atlas zu diesem Thema ist in Vorbereitung.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 749-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Solomon SD, Saldana F. Point-of-care ultrasound in medical education – stop listening and look. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1083-1085
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bahner D, Blaivas M, Cohen HL et al. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 313-318
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Baugher KM, Euerle BD, Sommerkamp SK et al. Image quality evaluation of a portable handheld ultrasound machine for the focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination. Am J Emerg Med 2014; 32: 389-391
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Coskun F, Akinci E, Ceyhan MA et al. Our new stethoscope in the emergency department: handheld ultrasound. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011; 17: 488-492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D et al. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2010; 28: 29-56, vii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dietrich CF, Nuernberg D. Lehratlas der interventionellen Sonographie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Wittenberg M. Will ultrasound scanners replace the stethoscope?. BMJ 2014; 348: g3463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Piscaglia F, Dietrich CF, Nolsoe C et al. EFSUMB Newsletter: Birth of “Echoscopy” – The EFSUMB Point of View. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 92
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Barreiros AP, Cui XW, Ignee A et al. EchoScopy in scanning abdominal diseases: initial clinical experience. Z Gastroenterol 2014; 52: 269-275
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Biais M, Carrie C, Delaunay F et al. Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting. Crit Care 2012; 16: R82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Culp BC, Mock JD, Chiles CD et al. The pocket echocardiograph: validation and feasibility. Echocardiography 2010; 27: 759-764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Culp BC, Mock JD, Ball TR et al. The pocket echocardiograph: a pilot study of its validation and feasibility in intubated patients. Echocardiography 2011; 28: 371-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Frederiksen CA, Juhl-Olsen P, Larsen UT et al. New pocket echocardiography device is interchangeable with high-end portable system when performed by experienced examiners. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 1217-1223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kark NS, Ewertsen C, Svendsen LB et al. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma in patients with confirmed liver lesions. Scand J Surg 2012; 101: 287-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 11-29
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39: 187-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sienz M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. [Reference values in abdominal ultrasound – liver and liver vessels]. Z Gastroenterol 2010; 48: 1141-1152
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dietrich CF. EFSUMB Course Book on Ultrasound. London: European Federation of Societies of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB); 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Tuma J, Badea R, Dietrich CF. EFSUMB Course Book, Student Edition. London: European Federation of Societies of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB); 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Braden B, Faust D, Ignee A et al. Clinical relevance of perihepatic lymphadenopathy in acute and chronic liver disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 931-936
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 De Molo C, Cui XW, Pirri C et al. Pancreas mobile. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 1165-1170
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pirri C, Cui XW, De Molo C et al. The pancreatic head is larger than often assumed. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 390-394
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dijos M, Pucheux Y, Lafitte M et al. Fast track echo of abdominal aortic aneurysm using a real pocket-ultrasound device at bedside. Echocardiography 2012; 29: 285-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Siso-Almirall A, Gilabert SR, Bru SC et al. [Feasibility of hand-held-ultrasonography in the screening of abdominal aortic aneurysms and abdominal aortic atherosclerosis]. Med Clin (Barc ) 2013; 141: 417-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bailey RP, Ault M, Greengold NL et al. Ultrasonography performed by primary care residents for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 845-849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Dietrich CF, Muller G, Ignee A. [Acute abdomen, gastroenterologists view]. Praxis (Bern 1994) 2007; 96: 645-659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Barreiros AP et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for imaging of adrenal masses. Ultraschall Med 2010; 31: 163-168
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dietrich CF, Wehrmann T, Hoffmann C et al. Detection of the adrenal glands by endoscopic or transabdominal ultrasound. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 859-864
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Trojan J, Schwarz W, Sarrazin C et al. Role of ultrasonography in the detection of small adrenal masses. Ultraschall Med 2002; 23: 96-100
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Jenssen C, Dietrich CF. [Ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound of the adrenal glands]. Ultraschall Med 2010; 31: 228-247
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. Minimum Training Recommendations for the Practice of Medical Ultrasound in Europe (EFSUMB). Im Internet: http://www.efsumb.org/guidelines/guidelines01.asp
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Dietrich CF, Rudd L. The EFSUMB website, a guide for better understanding. Med Ultrason 2013; 15: 215-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sicari R, Galderisi M, Voigt JU et al. The use of pocket-size imaging devices: a position statement of the European Association of Echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011; 12: 85-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Dietrich CF, Riemer-Hommel P. Challenges for the German Health Care System. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 557-572
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Dietrich CF. [Editorial on the contribution “Challenges for the German Health Care System”]. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 555-556
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar