Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28(3): 150-158
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1384811
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Virtual Surgical Planning in Craniofacial Surgery

Harvey Chim
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Nicholas Wetjen
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Samir Mardini
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 September 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The complex three-dimensional anatomy of the craniofacial skeleton creates a formidable challenge for surgical reconstruction. Advances in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing technology have created increasing applications for virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery, such as preoperative planning, fabrication of cutting guides, and stereolithographic models and fabrication of custom implants. In this review, the authors describe current and evolving uses of virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery.

Keywords

virtual surgical planning - craniofacial surgery - craniosynostosis - cranial vault remodeling - distraction osteogenesis
 

  • References

  • 1 Bly RA, Chang SH, Cudejkova M, Liu JJ, Moe KS. Computer-guided orbital reconstruction to improve outcomes. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15 (2) 113-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Foley BD, Thayer WP, Honeybrook A, McKenna S, Press S. Mandibular reconstruction using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing: an analysis of surgical results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71 (2) e111-e119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hierl T, Arnold S, Kruber D, Schulze FP, Hümpfner-Hierl H. CAD-CAM-assisted esthetic facial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71 (1) e15-e23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nikkhah D, Ponniah A, Ruff C, Dunaway D. Planning surgical reconstruction in Treacher-Collins syndrome using virtual simulation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (5) 790e-805e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tepper OM, Sorice S, Hershman GN, Saadeh P, Levine JP, Hirsch D. Use of virtual 3-dimensional surgery in post-traumatic craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69 (3) 733-741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Zhao L, Patel PK, Cohen M. Application of virtual surgical planning with computer assisted design and manufacturing technology to cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39 (4) 309-316
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Mardini S, Alsubaie S, Cayci C, Chim H, Wetjen N. Three-dimensional preoperative virtual planning and template use for surgical correction of craniosynostosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (3) 336-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Verma SN, Schow SR, Stone BH, Triplett RG. Applications of surgical navigational systems for craniofacial bone-anchored implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25 (3) 582-588
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nowinski D, Messo E, Hedlund A, Hirsch JM. Computer-navigated contouring of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia involving the orbit. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22 (2) 469-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cynthia DB, Steven S, Anil M , et al. A survey of interactive mesh-cutting techniques and a new method for implementing generalized interactive mesh cutting using virtual tools. J Visual Comput Animat 2002; 13: 21-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Zachow S, Gladilina E, Saderb R , et al. Draw and cut: intuitive 3D osteotomy planning on polygonal bone models. Int Congr Ser 2003; 1256: 362-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Westermark A, Zachow S, Eppley BL. Three-dimensional osteotomy planning in maxillofacial surgery including soft tissue prediction. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16 (1) 100-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 McGurk M, Amis AA, Potamianos P, Goodger NM. Rapid prototyping techniques for anatomical modelling in medicine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1997; 79 (3) 169-174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Joffe JM, McDermott PJ, Linney AD, Mosse CA, Harris M. Computer-generated titanium cranioplasty: report of a new technique for repairing skull defects. Br J Neurosurg 1992; 6 (4) 343-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Vander Sloten J, Degryse K, Gobin R, Van der Perre G, Mommaerts MY. Interactive simulation of cranial surgery in a computer aided design environment. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1996; 24 (2) 122-129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mommaerts MY, Jans G, Vander Sloten J, Staels PF, Van der Perre G, Gobin R. On the assets of CAD planning for craniosynostosis surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2001; 12 (6) 547-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Burge J, Saber NR, Looi T , et al. Application of CAD/CAM prefabricated age-matched templates in cranio-orbital remodeling in craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22 (5) 1810-1813
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Saber NR, Phillips J, Looi T , et al. Generation of normative pediatric skull models for use in cranial vault remodeling procedures. Childs Nerv Syst 2012; 28 (3) 405-410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pereira IMR, Filho AAB, Alvares BR, Palomari ET, Nanni L. Radiological determination of cranial size and index by measurement of skull diameters in a population of children in Brazil. Radiol Bras 2008; 41: 229-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Seruya M, Borsuk DE, Khalifian S, Carson BS, Dalesio NM, Dorafshar AH. Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniosynostosis surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (4) 1100-1105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Khechoyan DY, Saber NR, Burge J , et al. Surgical outcomes in craniosynostosis reconstruction: the use of prefabricated templates in cranial vault remodelling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (1) 9-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Moro A, Cannas R, Boniello R, Gasparini G, Pelo S. Techniques on modeling the vascularized free fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20 (5) 1571-1573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Antony AK, Chen WF, Kolokythas A, Weimer KA, Cohen MN. Use of virtual surgery and stereolithography-guided osteotomy for mandibular reconstruction with the free fibula. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (5) 1080-1084
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Roser SM, Ramachandra S, Blair H , et al. The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in free fibula mandibular reconstruction: comparison of planned and final results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68 (11) 2824-2832
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hirsch DL, Garfein ES, Christensen AM, Weimer KA, Saddeh PB, Levine JP. Use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to produce orthognathically ideal surgical outcomes: a paradigm shift in head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67 (10) 2115-2122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hanasono MM, Jacob RF, Bidaut L, Robb GL, Skoracki RJ. Midfacial reconstruction using virtual planning, rapid prototype modeling, and stereotactic navigation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (6) 2002-2006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Saad A, Winters R, Wise MW, Dupin CL, St Hilaire H. Virtual surgical planning in complex composite maxillofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (3) 626-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rohner D, Jaquiéry C, Kunz C, Bucher P, Maas H, Hammer B. Maxillofacial reconstruction with prefabricated osseous free flaps: a 3-year experience with 24 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (3) 748-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Schepers RH, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A , et al. Fully 3-dimensional digitally planned reconstruction of a mandible with a free vascularized fibula and immediate placement of an implant-supported prosthetic construction. Head Neck 2013; 35 (4) E109-E114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Modabber A, Gerressen M, Ayoub N , et al. Computer-assisted zygoma reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft. Int J Med Robot 2013; 9 (4) 497-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ayoub N, Ghassemi A, Rana M , et al. Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial. Trials 2014; 15: 114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Doscher ME, Garfein ES, Bent J, Tepper OM. Neonatal mandibular distraction osteogenesis: converting virtual surgical planning into an operative reality. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78 (2) 381-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Haq J, Patel N, Weimer K, Matthews NS. Single stage treatment of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint using patient-specific total joint replacement and virtual surgical planning. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 52 (4) 350-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Chandran R, Keeler GD, Christensen AM, Weimer KA, Caloss R. Application of virtual surgical planning for total joint reconstruction with a stock alloplast system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69 (1) 285-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Brown EN, Dorafshar AH, Bojovic B , et al. Total face, double jaw, and tongue transplant simulation: a cadaveric study using computer-assisted techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (4) 815-823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Chim H, Amer H, Mardini S, Moran SL. Vascularized composite allotransplantation in the realm of regenerative plastic surgery. Mayo Clin Proc 2014; 89 (7) 1009-1020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar