Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377497
Recurrent rectovaginal fistula: treatment with self-expanding metal stents
Postoperative rectovaginal fistula is a rare complication after colorectal resection for cancer. This adverse event results in a scenario of fear and misunderstanding for the patient [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Often, local inflammation, widespread infection, friability of the vaginal and rectal tissue, and the inevitably reduced perfusion of blood to the lower end of the rectum make any form of treatment hazardous and likely to cause complications. Even in cases in which the fistula heals, altered colorectal motility is common.
Self-expandable metal stents can be used to treat patients with rectovaginal fistula after colorectal resection for cancer. Of 10 patients who had rectovaginal fistula after colorectal resection for cancer and were treated with endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent, three had been referred after multiple failed operations. All three patients had a diverting proximal stoma. We used fully covered colonic stents 10 cm in length and 28 mm in diameter (Tae Woong Medical, Gimpo Si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) in all of them. There were no complications after the procedures. In one patient, the rectovaginal fistula healed without evidence of major fecal incontinence 8 months after stent insertion ([Fig. 1 a – f]). In the remaining two patients, the fistula decreased significantly in size (from 4 × 4 cm to 1 × 1 cm) without evidence of local tissue inflammation; both of these patients underwent a successful flap transposition 8 months after stent placement. In all three patients, the stent dislodged 3 months after placement, and a new stent was placed.


Self-expandable metal stents are a valid adjunct to the treatment of patients with complex, recurrent rectovaginal fistula after colorectal resection for cancer.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AG
Competing interests: None
-
References
- 1 Ommer A, Herold A, Berg E et al. German S3-guideline: rectovaginal fistula. Ger Med Sci 2013; 10: 15
- 2 Schloricke E, Zimmermann M, Hoffmann M et al. Surgical treatment and prognosis of rectovaginal fistulae according to their origin. Zentralbl Chir 2012; 137: 390-395
- 3 Auyang ED, Santos BF, Enter DH et al. Natural orifice tranlumenal endoscopic surgery: a technical review. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3135-3148
- 4 Jarrar A, Church J. Advancement flap repair: a good option for complex anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 1537-1541
- 5 Zimmermann MS, Hoffmann M, Hildebrand P et al. Surgical repair of rectovaginal fistulas: a challenge. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 817-819
- 6 Machado GR, Bojalian MO, Reeves ME. Transanal endoscopic repair of rectal anastomotic defects. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 1219-1222
Corresponding author
-
References
- 1 Ommer A, Herold A, Berg E et al. German S3-guideline: rectovaginal fistula. Ger Med Sci 2013; 10: 15
- 2 Schloricke E, Zimmermann M, Hoffmann M et al. Surgical treatment and prognosis of rectovaginal fistulae according to their origin. Zentralbl Chir 2012; 137: 390-395
- 3 Auyang ED, Santos BF, Enter DH et al. Natural orifice tranlumenal endoscopic surgery: a technical review. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3135-3148
- 4 Jarrar A, Church J. Advancement flap repair: a good option for complex anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 1537-1541
- 5 Zimmermann MS, Hoffmann M, Hildebrand P et al. Surgical repair of rectovaginal fistulas: a challenge. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 817-819
- 6 Machado GR, Bojalian MO, Reeves ME. Transanal endoscopic repair of rectal anastomotic defects. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 1219-1222

