Homœopathic Links 2014; 27(4): 221-226
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368650
PHILOSOPHY AND DISCUSSION
Sonntag Verlag in MVS Medizinverlage Stuttgart GmbH & Co. KG Stuttgart · New York

Miasms, Classifications, Symptoms

Richard Pitt , United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 November 2014 (online)

Summary

The application of miasmatic theory and the use of nosodes in homeopathy have always been somewhat controversial and reflective of particular interpretations from different homeopaths. However, it is clear that nosodes have a unique and vital role in homeopathic prescribing and open doors in a case where no other remedy will work. Also, miasmatic theory has evolved since Hahnemannʼs time and reveals some of the most fascinating homeopathic interpretations of genetic and epigenetic theories. Therefore, this essay explores the situation when nosodes are needed in practice and miasmatic interpretations that enable the justification for their use.

 
  • References

  • 1 Dimitriadis G. The Theory of Chronic Disease According to Hahnemann. Sydney: Hahnemann Institute; 2005
  • 2 Sanchez Ortega P. Notes on Miasms. New Delhi: B. Jain; 1980
  • 3 Eizayaga F. A Treatise on Homeopathic Medicine. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Marecel; 1991
  • 4 Hahnemann S. Chronic Diseases. 1828. Reprint. New Delhi: B. Jain; 1993
  • 5 Choudhury H. Indications of Miasms. New Delhi: B. Jain; 2008
  • 6 Heudens Mast H. The Foundation of the Chronic Miasms in the Practice of Homeopathy. Tallahassee (FL): Lutea Press; 2005