Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2014; 74(3): 251-259
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368229
DGGG Review
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

DGGG Guidelines Programme: Status Quo – Quo Vadis!

DGGG-Leitlinienprogramm: Status quo – quo vadis!
M. W. Beckmann
Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Erlangen
,
I. Linde
Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Erlangen
,
C. Bütof
Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Erlangen
,
R. Kreienberg
Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Erlangen
,
P. Gass
Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Erlangen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Correspondence

Dr. Paul Gass
University Hospital, Department of Gynaecology
Universitätsstraße 21–23
91054 Erlangen

 

DGGG-Leitliniensekretariat
Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Universitätsstraße 21–23
91054 Erlangen
Phone: 0 91 31/85-4 40 95 or -3 35 07   

Publication History

received 08 February 2014
revised 21 February 2014

accepted 21 February 2014

Publication Date:
09 April 2014 (online)

 

Abstract

The Guidelines programme of the German Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) is an executive part of the DGGG Guidelines Commission. It includes in-house planning and organisation of all guidelines as well as representation outside of the DGGG. This article does not concern the development of the guidelines as much as it concerns the planning, organisation, registration, editing and publication of the guidelines in context of the DGGG Guidelines programme. It targets interested parties, especially authors and coordinators of guidelines.


#

Zusammenfassung

Das Leitlinienprogramm der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG) ist ein exekutiver Teil der DGGG-Leitlinienkommission. Es umfasst die Planung und Organisation aller Leitlinien innerhalb wie auch die Repräsentation außerhalb der DGGG. Dieser Beitrag soll weniger die Leitlinienentwicklung, sondern mehr die Planung, Organisation, Anmeldung, Redaktion und Publikation der Leitlinien im Rahmen des DGGG-Leitlinienprogramms darstellen. Zielgruppe sind Interessierte, insbesondere Autoren/innen bzw. Koordinatoren/innen von Leitlinien.


#

Introduction

Matthias W. Beckmann (Erlangen) has confirmed his succession of Rolf Kreienberg (formerly Ulm) in December 2012 as DGGG Guidelines Commissioner and was confirmed by the DGGG Board of Directors. Previously, Rolf Kreienberg became a member of the Executive Committee of the AWMF and Director of the permanent “Guidelines” commission of the AWMF in May of 2013. The DGGG Guidelines programme is supported by the DGGG Guidelines Commission, which consists of members of the individual focus groups (FG) of the DGGG ([Fig. 1]). The structure and the resulting responsibilities and tasks of the newly established guidelines programme are subject to the changing times. The professional handling of guidelines within other societies has led DGGG to pursuing this central restructuring. In particular, this concerns comprehensive and transparent organisation (registration, communication processes, etc.), commissioning the creation of guidelines, as well as clearly regulated procedures via the DGGG Guidelines Commission and the DGGG Board of Directors in cooperation with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF). The process of guideline creation is the foremost issue [1], [2], [3].

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Overview of the DGGG Guidelines Commission.

In the run-up to working on structured guidelines, detailed knowledge of AMWF regulation [4] in the current version 1.0 and familiarity with the specific nomenclature is beneficial. For example, the AWMF differentiates between

  1. “current guidelines” [5],

  2. “pending guidelines” [6] and

  3. “expired guidelines”.

The first point of the classification defines valid guidelines with a definitive period of validity (designation from beginning to end). For current guidelines, this is between 3–5 years. The second point of the classification is defined by a concrete registration procedure for new guidelines or guideline revisions.


#

Policy (Levels of Classification)

It is mandatory to define the classification stage of guidelines at the beginning of planning. This is the yardstick for later monetary, organisational and time expenditures. There are three levels: the lowest stage (S1), the middle stage (S2) and the highest stage (S3) [2], [4].

The lowest class is defined by a compilation of recommendations for actions by a non-representative group of experts. The methodical generation of a consensus here is of little importance compared to the other guideline stages.

In 2004, Stage S2 was split into two sub-stages, one based on evidence research (S2e) and the other based on structural consensus (S2k). From practical experience, doing only evidence research of current literature is preferred by many past guideline authors as opposed to the documented and structural finding of a consensus by a representative panel. The highest Stage S3 combines the two procedures into a complete work of highest methodological relevance.


#

Nomenclature

AWMF register number/Guideline title

The next step is registering with the AWMF with a registration number. This unique AWMF register number will be part of a guideline throughout its life. The syntax (XYZ/XYZ) has two parts. The first three digits define the responsible AWMF society (only one entry is possible with multiple jurisdictions). The last three digits are for creating a continuous identification number for the guidelines. The combination of the two parts provides a unique register number and formally differentiates between a guideline and an advisory opinion on stage S1. Binding guidelines and, for example, horizontal guidelines of the German Medical Association are not included. In some cases, the guidelines title can be changed when revisions include new topics. Approval of the DGGG Guideline Secretariat is required. This shall not unduly complicate later matching of past guidelines.


#

Leading/participating society(s)

Also, the representatives or delegates of the participating AWMF society or non-AWMF society/organisation/lobby are expressly mentioned in the registration process and later in the published version. Not every society can register guidelines with the AWMF. To date, the AWMF has registered 168 select societies (as of January 2014) via a transparent registration procedure. During the admission procedure, the society must meet 10 admission criteria in order for their application to be approved by a three-quarter majority of the Delegates Conference that takes place twice a year. Nevertheless, non-AWMF societies can participate in the creation of guidelines but cannot register them themselves. Their participation is actually expressly desired. The defined interest group or target group of specified guidelines principally requires their representation for the creation of those guidelines.


#

Author of guidelines/elected representative

In order to make the development process effective on the part of the authors, it makes sense to appoint a lead author or coordinator in/for the control group. This appointee is responsible for communication with the DGGG Guidelines Secretariat and coordinates the registration and creation process. The team of authors consists of elected representatives of the focus groups (FG) of the DGGG and the expert and/or non-expert societies/organisations. Specifically, the elected representative of the DGGG FGs are not appointed by the lead author of the guidelines in this new guidelines programme procedure, but instead are recommended by the respective FG following an enquiry about such by the lead guidelines author. The elected representative to-be is either confirmed or rejected by the DGGG Guidelines Commission or the representing DGGG Guidelines appointee. The same scenario applies to the lead author him/herself. This newly established procedure provides for maximum transparency when it comes to the selection of elected representatives.


#

Versions of guidelines documents

The AMWF policy allows guideline authors to publish their guidelines in differently edited versions. There must be no subject unconformities in the synopsis of all versions. Besides the long version, common versions are short versions/practice versions published in journals, a patient version, an international long or short version in English, and now also a DIA version. So far, 7 DIA versions are published on the AWMF homepage ([Table 1]) and additional DIA versions are being worked on. This version serves to preserve the thematic link to the long version by summarising all statements. This means, all DIA versions or single slides can be distributed or used in training events (seminars, conferences, etc.) without any problems. The template for the DIA version is provided by the DGGG Guidelines Secretariat ([Fig. 2]). The first illustrative example was and is the guidelines coordinated by Prof. Dr. Uwe Ulrich from Berlin for the “015-045 Diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis” [7].

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 DGGG template of DIA version.

Table 1 Already published DIA versions (as of 19 February 2 014).

AWMF number

Guideline title

015-005

Stress incontinence in women[14]

015-023

Vaginal operative deliveries [15]

015-028

Bacterial vaginosis in Obstetrics and Gynaecology [16]

015-045

Diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis"[7]

015-052

Female genital malformations [17]

015-071

Treatment of inflammatory breast diseases during lactation [18]

032-035

Diagnosis and treatment of malignant ovarian tumours [19]


#
#

Guideline Status

The processing of all guidelines that have been published to date has been enormously taxing on the DGGG Guidelines Secretariat. This concerned cataloguing and chronological cataloguing of all digital guidelines found. Only since 2004 have they been available in digital format. Of these 400 versions, almost 260 guidelines (long versions) are currently invalid and therefore have no direct clinical relevance. The legal relevance, especially in the context of expert processes, forced the long-term availability of all of these documents in the guidelines secretariat and they are therefore also available to DGGG members and interested parties. A system was created for cataloguing these guidelines. Besides the unique date and numerical assignment of the guidelines version, a new “Present status” was implemented. It is divided into the following values:

  1. Valid: As a valid guidelines it corresponds to the “current guidelines” of the AWMF [5].

  2. New: Corresponds to a planned new publication of a set of guidelines. This status can be temporarily found as “registered guidelines” of the AWMF [6] only if the registration procedure has been completed.

  3. Revision: Corresponds to guidelines that are currently being revised. This status can be temporarily found as “registered guidelines” of the AWMF [6] only if the registration procedure has been completed. After a set of guidelines has been created, this status changes to valid if it was successful or expired if it has failed.

  4. Expired: Corresponds to guidelines that are no longer valid. This status is temporary for one year. If the content is being revised, that status of the guidelines changes to Revision, or if there is no revision it changes to Archived. Since the beginning of January 2014, these guidelines are available for download from the DGGG homepage and accessible to all interested parties [8].

  5. Archived: Corresponds to a set of guidelines after the expiration of one-year with an Expired status. Since the beginning of January 2014, archived guidelines are available for download on the DGGG homepage and are accessible to all interested parties [8]. These archived guidelines often have duplicate entries (AWMF number with guidelines title), depending on the number of revisions. For this status, a sub-status was established at a later point in time. It is called transferred and corresponds to a set of guidelines, which, after consultation with the author of the guidelines, is transferred to guidelines of a different name or has been transferred already ([Table 2]). It will not be published in the future.

Table 2 Archived guidelines which were transferred to other guidelines or planned guidelines (as of January 2014).

AWMF number

Guideline title

AWMF number

Guideline title (transferred to)

015-021

Antenatal care and labour induction with status post C-section

Possibly new C-section guideline

015-022

Presence of fathers in C-sections

New C-section guidelines

015-046

Placenta disorders in status after C-section

New C-section guidelines

015-054

Absolute and relative indications for C-section

New C-section guidelines

015-056

Postoperative monitoring of C-section patients

New C-section guidelines

015-064

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH)

New hysterectomy guidelines

015-012

Postpartum disorders of bladder and pelvic floor function

015-005
015-006

Stress incontinence [10], [14]
Descent in women [20]

015-013

Bladder emptying disorders

015-005
015-006

Stress incontinence [10], [14]
Descent in women [20]

015-037

Contraception in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

015-015

Contraception

015-014

Urogenital atrophy

015-062

Hormone therapy in peri- and postmenopause [21]

015-033

Recommendation for sonographic diagnosis in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients

015-062

Hormone therapy in peri- and postmenopause [21]

015-038

Consensus recommendations for hormone therapy (HT) in menopause and postmenopause

015-062

Hormone therapy in peri- and postmenopause [21]

015-042

Antifungal therapy of vaginal yeast colonisation

015-072

Vulvovaginal candidiasis

015-003

Laparoscopic surgery of ovarian tumours

032-035

Diagnosis and treatment of malignant ovarian tumours [11], [19]

015-009

Urinary tract infection of women

043-044

Urinary tract infections [22]

015-010

Urinary tract infection in pregnancy

043-044

Urinary tract infections [22]

015-041

Recommendations for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy

059-005

Infections with Chlamydia trachomatis


#

DGGG Guidelines Programme Homepage

In light of the new direction of the DGGG Guidelines programme, there was no way around completely redesigning the DGGG homepage (http://www.dggg.de/leitlinienstellungnahmen/). This process was split into three phases:

Phase I was concluded in October 2013 and includes the following changes:

  1. Link to the AWMF homepage for all currently registered guidelines authored by DGGG or guidelines that DGGG participated in. The different layouts of DGGG and AWMF were matched. The primary reason for this decision was the lack of transparency as to which version is or was valid at what point in time. A direct download to the guidelines without a link was available for an extended period of time, even though the guidelines may not have been valid any more. The document was not marked as expired or archived. This increased confusion and the risk of erroneously assuming a document was valid. These direct links to the AWMF will be maintained by the DGGG office in Berlin from now on.

  2. All new statements of the DGGG were issued a consecutive number. Similar to the guidelines, this will make it easier to match the statements in the future. Past statements were not issued a number.

Phase II will be concluded in the spring of 2014 and includes the following changes:

  1. Making available all archived guidelines (2004–2012). This step was already concluded at the beginning of January 2014.

  2. Making available all archived statements. The goal is to have this step completed by the end of February 2014.

  3. Expansion of offering of the following documents/links (only accessible to DGGG members) [9] in context of the structural reform of the guidelines.

    • Structure paper as the basis of guidelines creation and guidelines structure,

    • Standard Operating Procedure (SOP Version 10. 10. 2013) marks the detailed flow and communication channels of guidelines development/revision of guidelines ([Fig. 3]),

    • AWMF registration form as specially adjusted and partially pre-filled DGGG version ([Fig. 4]),

    • AWMF registration form (fill-in help) as specially adjusted DGGG version ([Fig. 5]),

    • Travel expense form for guidelines authors

    • Funding application for guidelines authors

    • Link to AWMF policy

    • Link to Conflict of Interest declarations (CoI) for guidelines authors

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for guidelines organisation [9].
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Registration form (DGGG version) [9].
Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Help for filling in the registration form (DGGG version), page 1 only [9].

Phase III should be concluded at the end of 2014 and includes the following changes:

  1. Making available all archived guidelines (before 2004). These versions of the guidelines are available in non-digital formats only. This chronological categorisation will pose the biggest challenge.

  2. Further content and interface adjustments.


#

Publication

Full publication is one of the critical processes of guidelines work. The work, which often takes several years, must be publicised in an appropriate manner. A distinction is made between the publication of all guidelines documents (also full version) on the AWMF homepage and the versions for international distribution (short or long versions) in English. Previous guidelines were often published in the “Frauenarzt” (Gynaecologist) magazine. With the increased development of S2/S3 guidelines of high methodological quality from Germany, it was necessary to find a new publication outlet. The DGGG Guidelines programme has decided in favour of the “Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde (GebFra)” (Obstetrics and Gynaecology), published by the Thieme Publishing [10], [11], [12], [13]. Listing in the database of the National Library of Medicine (NLM), known as MEDLINE, is expected in 2014. This means that all guidelines versions published there can be found via pubmed.org or other search interfaces, at the very least as an abstract. This process will increase exposure in English-speaking territories enormously.


#

Workshops

To get to know better all processes of guidelines planning/organisation as well as guidelines creation (not covered here), the first workshop of the DGGG Guidelines programme was held on 18. 1. 2014 in Erlangen. Based on this success, an additional workshop will be offered this year for select guidelines authors.


#

Overview of Tasks of the DGGG Guidelines Secretariat

The tasks currently assigned to the DGGG Guidelines Secretariat in the context of DGGG Guidelines organisation are manifold and in part only briefly described here.

  1. Planning, coordination and financing of the DGGG Guidelines programme

    • Registration of new or revised guidelines: new registration or update (guidelines class stays the same)/upgrade (guidelines class is raised, rarely downgraded) of existing guidelines.

    • Communication with the participants

    • Communication with AWMF

    • Selection and concentration of topics

    • Ensuring the archiving of all guidelines/correspondence: in digital format for the first time thanks to a special document management program.

  2. Participation in the DGGG Guidelines Commission meeting (2 ×/year)

  3. Participation in the AMWF Delegates Conference (2 ×/year)

  4. Maintaining the DGGG homepage with the numerous improvements thus far

  5. Conducting workshops

  6. Processing external requests (IQWIG, AQUA, DIMDI, medical associations, colleagues, etc.)

  7. Regular news updates via newsletter to all DGGG members


#

Objectives of the DGGG Guidelines Programme

If the basis of the daily work is structured and economised, then the conditions for the planning of new goals are met. The prioritisation and rationalisation of issues across the entire catalogue of guidelines should be a new focal point. The focus should be on overriding issues and with the assignment of such to the responsible working groups of the DGGG. In doing so, the tight financial and time resources should be used in a more structured way, especially in terms of creating guidelines. With regard to the creation of guidelines with ever inter-disciplinary and inter-professional cooperation, this step seems to be inevitable. Another focus point is the improvement of international distribution of German guidelines. Thanks to the excellent cooperation of our Austrian and Swiss colleagues in committee work as well for the creation of new guidelines, the overall effort, which is often volunteered, can be reduced in this regard without risking a loss in quality. Of course not all topics and opinions can be combined due to country-specific differences.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

None.


Correspondence

Dr. Paul Gass
University Hospital, Department of Gynaecology
Universitätsstraße 21–23
91054 Erlangen

 

DGGG-Leitliniensekretariat
Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Universitätsstraße 21–23
91054 Erlangen
Phone: 0 91 31/85-4 40 95 or -3 35 07   


Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Overview of the DGGG Guidelines Commission.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 DGGG template of DIA version.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for guidelines organisation [9].
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Registration form (DGGG version) [9].
Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Help for filling in the registration form (DGGG version), page 1 only [9].