Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2014; 32(02): 093-099
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363550
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Embryo Selection with Preimplantation Chromosomal Screening in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Lora K. Shahine
1   Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Pacific NW Fertility and IVF Specialists, Seattle, Washington
,
Ruth B. Lathi
2   Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 February 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a multifactorial disorder which is often challenging for both patients and providers. Guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of patients with RPL include screening for uterine abnormalities, parental chromosomes, and antiphospholipid antibodies, but approximately half of RPL patients remain unexplained. The current recommendation for patients with unexplained RPL is expectant management which offers most patients a 60 to 80% success rate over time. Genetic imbalances in the embryo, including inherited unbalanced translocations and de novo aneuploidy, are frequent causes of miscarriage. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) has been proposed as an effective method for selecting viable embryos for transfer that may result lower risk of miscarriage for patients with unexplained RPL and carriers of balanced translocations. The current evidence examining the use of in vitro fertilization with PGS in patients with RPL reveals variable results, due to differences in technologies used and variable patient populations. Newer approaches, which include blastocyst biopsy and the ability to screen for all 24 chromosomes, show the most promise in reducing miscarriage rates. Studies that identify which patients are most likely to benefit from PGS and include live birth rates per initiated cycles are needed before universally recommending this treatment to couples with RPL.

Keywords

miscarriage - recurrent pregnancy loss - preimplantation genetic screening - aneuploidy - translocation - chromosome screening
 

  • References

  • 1 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (5) 1103-1111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O'Connor JF , et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1988; 319 (4) 189-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Edmonds DK, Lindsay KS, Miller JF, Williamson E, Wood PJ. Early embryonic mortality in women. Fertil Steril 1982; 38 (4) 447-453
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Jacobs PS, Hassold T. Chromosomal abnormalities: origin and etiology in abortions and live births. In: Vogel F, Sperling K, , eds. Human Genetics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1987: 233-244
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Knudsen UB, Hansen V, Juul S, Secher NJ. Prognosis of a new pregnancy following previous spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 39 (1) 31-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Stirrat GM. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet 1990; 336 (8716) 673-675
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stephenson MD. Frequency of factors associated with habitual abortion in 197 couples. Fertil Steril 1996; 66 (1) 24-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jaslow CR, Carney JL, Kutteh WH. Diagnostic factors identified in 1020 women with two versus three or more recurrent pregnancy losses. Fertil Steril 2010; 93 (4) 1234-1243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Stephenson MD, Sierra S. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement. Hum Reprod 2006; 21 (4) 1076-1082
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sugiura-Ogasawara M. Reciprocal translocation carriers in recurrent miscarriage parents may yield an unbalanced fetal chromosome pattern. Hum Reprod 2004; 19 (9) 2171-2172 , author reply 2172
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Stephenson MD. Management of recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a reciprocal translocation: a systematic review. Semin Reprod Med 2011; 29 (6) 470-481
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Fischer J, Colls P, Escudero T, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) improves pregnancy outcome for translocation carriers with a history of recurrent losses. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (1) 283-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kyu Lim C, Hyun Jun J, Mi Min D , et al. Efficacy and clinical outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis using FISH for couples of reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations: the Korean experience. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24 (7) 556-561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Otani T, Roche M, Mizuike M, Colls P, Escudero T, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly improves the pregnancy outcome of translocation carriers with a history of recurrent miscarriage and unsuccessful pregnancies. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13 (6) 869-874
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Scriven PN, Flinter FA, Khalaf Y, Lashwood A, Mackie Ogilvie C. Benefits and drawbacks of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for reciprocal translocations: lessons from a prospective cohort study. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21 (10) 1035-1041
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Daniely M, Aviram-Goldring A, Barkai G, Goldman B. Detection of chromosomal aberration in fetuses arising from recurrent spontaneous abortion by comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 1998; 13 (4) 805-809
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Okada S, Suzumori K. Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages. Fertil Steril 2000; 73 (2) 300-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Carp H, Toder V, Aviram A, Daniely M, Mashiach S, Barkai G. Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2001; 75 (4) 678-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fritz B, Hallermann C, Olert J , et al. Cytogenetic analyses of culture failures by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH)-Re-evaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early spontaneous abortions. Eur J Hum Genet 2001; 9 (7) 539-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sullivan AE, Silver RM, LaCoursiere DY, Porter TF, Branch DW. Recurrent fetal aneuploidy and recurrent miscarriage. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104 (4) 784-788
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Stephenson MD, Awartani KA, Robinson WP. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17 (2) 446-451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 McFadyen IR. Early fetal loss. In: Rodek C, , ed. Fetal Medicine. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Scientific; 1989: 26-43
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Hassold T, Chiu D. Maternal age-specific rates of numerical chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomy. Hum Genet 1985; 70 (1) 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Marquard K, Westphal LM, Milki AA, Lathi RB. Etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss in women over the age of 35 years. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (4) 1473-1477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mantzouratou A, Mania A, Fragouli E , et al. Variable aneuploidy mechanisms in embryos from couples with poor reproductive histories undergoing preimplantation genetic screening. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (7) 1844-1853
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kiss A, Rosa RFM, Dibi RP , et al. [Chromosomal abnormalities in couples with history of recurrent abortion]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2009; 31 (2) 68-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Coutelle C, Williams C, Handyside A, Hardy K, Winston R, Williamson R. Genetic analysis of DNA from single human oocytes: a model for preimplantation diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. BMJ 1989; 299 (6690) 22-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Handyside AH, Lesko JG, Tarín JJ, Winston RM, Hughes MR. Birth of a normal girl after in vitro fertilization and preimplantation diagnostic testing for cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 1992; 327 (13) 905-909
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Verlinsky Y, Ginsberg N, Lifchez A, Valle J, Moise J, Strom CM. Analysis of the first polar body: preconception genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 1990; 5 (7) 826-829
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pellicer A, Rubio C, Vidal F , et al. In vitro fertilization plus preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with recurrent miscarriage: an analysis of chromosome abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril 1999; 71 (6) 1033-1039
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo J, Ghadir S , et al. Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (3) 675-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Munné S, Chen S, Fischer J , et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis reduces pregnancy loss in women aged 35 years and older with a history of recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril 2005; 84 (2) 331-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wilding M, Forman R, Hogewind G , et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for the treatment of failed in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer and habitual abortion. Fertil Steril 2004; 81 (5) 1302-1307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Simón C, Rubio C, Vidal F , et al. Increased chromosome abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos after in-vitro fertilization in patients with recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Fertil Dev 1998; 10 (1) 87-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Musters AM, Repping S, Korevaar JC , et al. Pregnancy outcome after preimplantation, genetic screening, or natural conception in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review of the best available evidence. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (6) 2153-2157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Vidal F, Giménez C, Rubio C , et al. FISH preimplantation diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy in recurrent pregnancy wastage. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998; 15 (5) 310-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Rubio C, Simón C, Vidal F , et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (1) 182-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson G. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcomes following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2868-2871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I, Devroey P. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril 2005; 83 (2) 393-397 , quiz 525–526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Treff NR, Ferry KM, Zhao T, Su J, Forman EJ, Scott Jr RT. Cleavage stage embryo biopsy significantly impairs embryonic reproductive potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a novel paired analysis of cotransferred biopsied and nonbiopsied sibling embryos. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: S2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Capalbo A, Wright G, Themaat L, Elliott T, Rienzi L, Nagy ZP. Fish reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts reveals high accuracy of diagnosis and no sign of mosaicism or preferential allocation. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: S22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Capalbo A, Wright G, Elliott T, Slayden S, Mitchell-Leef D, Nagy ZP. Efficiency of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) using array-CGH compared to matched control IVF patient populations with and without day 3 PGS Fish. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: S59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sánchez-García J , et al. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (3) 953-958
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Christiansen OB, Nybo Andersen AM, Bosch E , et al. Evidence-based investigations and treatments of recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 2005; 83 (4) 821-839
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar