Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(07): 615-624
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358468
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Effects of Local Vibration on Bone Loss in ­Tail-Suspended Rats

L.-w. Sun
1   Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
,
H.-q. Luan
1   Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
,
Y.-f. Huang
1   Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
,
Y. Wang
1   Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
,
Y.-b. Fan
1   Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Correspondence

Prof. Yu bo Fan
Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education
School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering
Beihang University
No. 37
Xueyuan
Road Haidian district
Beijing 100191
China   
Phone: +86/10/82339 428   
Fax: +86/10/82339 428   

Publication History



accepted after revision 16 September 2013

Publication Date:
15 April 2014 (online)

 

Abstract

We investigated the effects of vibration (35 Hz, 45 Hz and 55 Hz) as countermeasure locally applied to unloading hind limbs on bone, muscle and Achilles tendon. 40 female Sprague Dawley rats were divided into 5 groups (n=8, each): tail-suspension (TS), TS plus 35 Hz/0.3 g vibration (TSV35), TS plus 45 Hz/0.3 g vibration (TSV45), TS plus 55 Hz/0.3 g vibration (TSV55) and control (CON). After 21 days, bone mineral density (BMD) and the microstructure of the femur and tibia were evaluated by μCT in vivo. The biomechanical properties of the femur and Achilles tendon were determined by a materials testing system. Ash weight of bone, isotonic contraction and wet weight of soleus were also investigated. 35 Hz and 45 Hz localized vibration were able to significantly ameliorate the decrease in trabecular BMD (expressed as the percentage change from TS, TSV35: 48.11%, TSV45: 31.09%), microstructure and ash weight of the femur and tibia induced by TS. Meanwhile, 35 Hz vibration significantly improved the biomechanical properties of the femur (57.24% bending rigidity and 41.66% Young’s modulus vs. TS) and Achilles tendon (45.46% maximum load and 66.67% Young’s modulus vs. TS). Additionally, Young’s modulus of the femur was highly correlated with microstructural parameters. Localized vibration was useful for counteracting microgravity-induced musculoskeletal loss. In general, the efficacy of 35 Hz was better than 45 Hz or 55 Hz in tail-suspended rats.


Introduction

Spaceflight has been shown to cause loss in bone mass and strength and muscle atrophy [5] [14], Simulated microgravity caused a decrease in tendon stiffness in the Achilles tendon [3] [33]. This may seriously affect astronaut performance and increases the risk of injury in space [28]. Bone loss is one of the highest risk factors during long spaceflight. Bone mineral density decreases at an average rate of about 1% per month within the early period in space [25]. Moreover, bone demineralization continues throughout the duration of such unloading stimulus [23]. Therefore, it is important to preserve the musculoskeletal system conditioning of astronauts in spaceflight.

Treadmill, cycle ergometer and interim resistance exercise have been applied on the International Space Station to counter bone loss and muscle atrophy [9]. However, bone loss cannot be fully prevented despite astronauts spending about 2.5 h per day on training [7] [45]. In addition to exercise training for preventing bone loss, studies have shown that high-frequency, low-amplitude whole-body vibration (WBV) prevented bone loss and the decrease in bone strength in both animals (rats and mice) [15] [31] [37] [47] and humans [18] [19]. The high-frequency vibration significantly prevented soleus muscle atrophy and improved the biomechanical properties of muscle tendon in animals (rats and mice) [26] [38] [48] and humans [43]. However, some studies have found that WBV might cause discomfort or be deleterious to the peripheral vasculature of mice [30] and humans [24]. Additionally, the effects of WBV depended on not only the frequency of vibration [32] but also the posture of body in mice [8] and humans [2] [35].

On the other hand, studies have suggested that the mechanisms of mechanically adaptive bone modeling and remodeling were local responses in rats or mice [1] [12] [16] [17] [39] [44] [51]. Wenger [47] found that the forelimb was unaffected by WBV even though WBV could improve femoral bone density in mice. More importantly, bone loss of astronauts during spaceflight and persons with spinal cord injury has occurred primarily in the lower limbs and trunk. Therefore, we believe that local vibration would be better than WBV for combating osteoporosis, especially in space.

To prove whether local vibration can counteract the deterioration of musculoskeletal system under microgravity, we investigated the effects of different frequencies of vibration (35 Hz, 45 Hz and 55 Hz) on microgravity-induced bone loss, muscle and Achilles tendon atrophy using a custom-made training device which applied vibration locally on hind limbs in tail-suspended rats. This study will be helpful not only in developing an efficient countermeasure against space-induced osteoporosis but also for understanding the mechanism of vibration on preventing osteoporosis and improving exercise training efficiency.


Materials and Methods

Experimental animals and animal care

Female 8-week old Sprague Dawley rats were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Beijing University (body weight ranged 175–195 g) and were subjected to the same housing conditions with 12-h dark-light cycles and food and water ad libitum for 21 days in the animal facility of our Department at Beihang University, China. Animal treatment and care conformed to the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals pursuant to Decree No. 2 of the State Science and Technology Commission of China and the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Animals approved by the Beijing Government. The study meets the ethical standards of the journal [20]. All protocols were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Beihang University.

After 7 days of adaptation in standard laboratory cages (n=2, each cage), 40 specimens were randomly divided into five groups (n=8, each): tail-suspension (TS), tail-suspension plus vibration exercise at 35 Hz (TSV35), tail-suspension plus vibration exercise at 45 Hz (TSV45), tail-suspension plus vibration exercise at 55 Hz (TSV55) and control (CON). In TS, TSV35, TSV45 and TSV55 rats were subjected to tail suspension for a duration of 21 days, thus simulating weightlessness as previously reported [29]. In addition, TSV35, TSV45 and TSV55 rats were treated by vibration with a custom made TS-rat training device designed in our laboratory ([Fig. 1]). On the device, the rats could engage in vibration exercise during hind limb unloading without harm, and hind limbs were subjected to vertical vibration loading. The rats were awake when vibration training was performed. The vibration treatment was administered twice a day (at 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.) for about 4 min each time.

Zoom
Fig. 1 a Diagram of custom-made vibration training device for the tail-suspended (TS)-rat b Photograph showing TS-rat during exercise on the device in the laboratory. The rat’s trunk was placed in a fixed box (30° angle) and hind paws were fixed by adhesives on the stepper footplates. When vibration training was performed, training was initiated by a motor connected to an eccentric bearing.

Bone mineral density (BMD) and microstructure were measured by µCT

At the end of experiment (day 22), rats were anaesthetized with 1% pentobarbital sodium (6 ml/kg, i.p.) for in vivo scan by µCT (SkyScan1076, Belgium). The distal femurs and proximal tibia of rats were scanned as previously reported [41]. Briefly, all scans were performed at the following settings: 70 kV X-ray voltage, 143 μA current, 1 mm aluminum filter, 18 μm pixel size, 360° tomographic rotation and a rotation step of 0.6°. The measured region started at the position of 1.898 mm to the growth plate level and extended to the diaphysis, covering a total length of 4.745 mm. All scans were reconstructed with the same parameters. The region of interest was delineated by freehand drawing from the same investigator, then BMD and the trabecular microstructural parameters of both distal femur and proximal tibia were calculated, including 1) BV/TV (Percent bone volume), 2) BS/BV (Bone surface/Bone volume), 3) Tb.Th (Trabecular thickness), 4) Tb.Sp (Trabecular separation), 5) Tb.N (Trabecular number) and 6) SMI (Structure model index). In addition, cross-sectional area (CSA) of rat whole calf muscles was calculated at 4.745 mm to the growth plate.


Isotonic contraction and wet weight of soleus

After the µCT scan, the soleus of right hind limb was immediately exposed without damage to its main arteries and veins in vivo. The distal tendon of soleus was separated from bone and then was attached to tension sensor by low elastic line. The proximal soleus was still attached with bone in vivo. Then the contractive function of soleus was measured by RM6240 multi-channel physiological signal acquisition decency (force sensor range: 0–50 g, sensitivity: 0.1 g; Chengdu instrument factory, Chengdu, China). Briefly, 2 Ag-AgCl electrodes were placed on the soleus belly. The soleus was stimulated by a square wave with 900 µs pulse width and an amplitude of 4 V [10] on RM6240 multi-channel physiological signal acquisition decency. Before single and tetanic stimulation, the soleus was adjusted to the optimal initial length. Single stimulation used a square wave, while tetanic stimulation was a square wave string. Next, five single contraction and tetanic contraction waveforms were recorded. During the experiment, the soleus was constantly dipped into the Ringer solution to keep the muscle fibers alive. Following euthanization, the tendons of the triceps surae were excised, and the weight of soleus and gastrocnemius dried by filter paper were ascertained on a Sartorius electronic balance (precision: 0.1 mg; Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany).


Measurement of biomechanical properties of femur through 3-point bending test

Following the in vivo measures as described above, rats were euthanized with narcotic overdose (1% pentobarbital sodium, 18 ml/kg, i.p.). The right femur of the rat hind limb was excised clean of soft tissues, wrapped in a saline-soaked gauze bandage and then preserved at −20° for the 3-point bending test. The three-point bending of femur in the mediolateral direction was carried out on a Shimadzu AG-10KNIS testing machine as previously reported [40]. Briefly, the span was approximately 20 mm. The specimen was preconditioned for 5 cycles of loading (10 N), which were applied on the medial surface of the femur at a rate of 0.1 mm/min. The bending load was applied at a rate of 0.1 mm/min until failure of the specimen. The maximum load (Max load), break load, stiffness, bending rigidity and Young’s modulus of the femoral mid shaft were determined and calculated.


Ash weight

The left femur and tibia of the rat hind limb were excised clean of soft tissues and treated using a modified version of the method previously described [21]. Specifically, bones were immersed in solvent (2 vol. chloroform: 1 vol. methanol) to extract fat for 5 days, then dried at 105° in a drying oven for 36 h until weight was stable. Dry weight was measured when cooling. All specimens were burned to ash at 700° C in a muffle furnace for 24 h. The ratio of ash weight was then calculated as AW%=ash weight/dry weight×100.


Tensile mechanical testing of tendons

Following euthanization, the left Achilles tendon unit was dissected free from surrounding tissues, leaving the distal portion attached to the calcaneus. The tissues were subsequently wrapped in saline-soaked gauze and stored in a Cryovial at −20℃ until the day of testing. The cross-sectional area and length of the tendon were measured by means of digital image just before mechanical testing.

Tensile testing of the Achilles tendon was carried out on a materials testing system (AG-IS MO, Shimadzu, Japan). The specimen was preconditioned for 8 cycles of loading (0–10 N) at a rate of 3 mm/min. The tensile load was applied at a rate of 3 mm/min until failure of the specimen. The maximum load (Max load), stiffness, break load, break stress, fracture deflection and Young’s modulus of the specimen were determined and calculated.


Statistical analysis

All values were expressed as means±standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 13.0 using univariate analysis. Pearson correlation analyses were used to assess the correlation between biomechanical parameters and microstructural parameters of femur. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05.



Results

BMD from µCT

As [Fig. 2] showed, trabecular BMD (g/cm3) of femur and tibia in the TS group decreased significantly compared with the CON, TSV35, TSV45 and TSV55 group, respectively, while there were no significant differences in the TSV35, TSV45 or TSV55 group compared to the CON group. There were no significant differences in cortical BMD (g/cm3) of femur and tibia among five groups.

Zoom
Fig. 2 a Trabecular BMD of femur by µCT* p<0.05 b Trabecular BMD of tibia by µCT* p<0.05 c Cortical BMD of femur by µCT d Cortical BMD of tibia by µCT.

Trabecular bone microstructure from µCT

In the femur and tibia, BV/TV, Tb.N and Tb.Th decreased significantly in the TS group compared to the CON, TSV35 or TSV45 group, while BS/BV, Tb.Sp and SMI in the TS group increased significantly compared to the CON and TSV35 group. BV/TV and Tb.N in the TS group decreased significantly compared to the TSV55 group. For microstructural parameters (BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, BS/BV, Tb.Sp and SMI), there was no significant difference in the TSV35 or TSV45 group compared to CON group, while Tb.Sp increased significantly in the TSV55 group compared to the CON group ([Fig. 3] and [Table 1]). In addition, the CSA of whole calf muscles in the TS group decreased significantly compared to the CON group. For the CSA of whole calf muscles, there was no significant difference in the TSV35, TSV45 and TSV55 group compared to the CON group ([Fig. 4]).

Zoom
Fig. 3 a Trabecular microstructural parameter (BV/TV) of femur by µCT* p<0.05 b Trabecular microstructural parameter (BS/BV) of femur by µCT* p<0.05 c Trabecular microstructural parameter (Tb.N) of femur by µCT* p<0.05 d Trabecular microstructural parameter (Tb.Sp) of femur by µCT* p<0.05 e Trabecular microstructural parameter (Tb.Th) of femur by µCT* p<0.05 f Trabecular microstructural parameter (SMI) of femur by µCT* p<0.05.
Zoom
Fig. 4 a Cross-Sectional Area (CSA) of whole rat right calf muscle by µCT*p<0.05 b Cross-Sectional Area (CSA) of whole rat left calf muscle by µCT* p<0.05.

Table 1 Trabecular microstructural parameters of tibia by µCT.

CON

TS

TSV35

TSV45

TSV55

BV/TV

48.59±6.72*

10.74±3.75

39.01±9.67*

33.38±7.63*﹠

24.72±3.67*﹟

BS/BV

29.29±4.18*

48.31±4.17

32.86±4.37*

35.40±4.35*

40.72±3.45

Tb.N

3.32±0.84*

1.07±0.39

3.08±0.55*

2.75±0.45*

2.22±0.25*

Tb.Sp

0.18±0.04*

0.43±0.21

0.18±0.03*

0.20±0.02

0.24±0.02﹟﹠

Tb.Th

0.12±0.02*

0.10±0.01

0.13±0.01*

0.12±0.01*

0.11±0.01*

SMI

0.75±0.89*

2.48±0.16

1.43±0.31*

1.68±0.34*

2.02±0.16*﹟

Values are mean±SD. Statistical tests were performed with univariate analysis. * indicates significant difference vs. TS, ﹟ indicates significant difference vs. CON, ﹠ indicates significant difference vs. TSV35 (p<0.05)


Contractile function and wet weight of soleus

As [Fig. 5] showed, the peak twitch tension (tensionps), maximum tetanic tension (tensionpo) and wet mass of the soleus (soleus weight) in the TS group were decreased significantly compared to the CON, TSV35, TSV45 and TSV55 group, respectively. No significant differences were found among the TSV35, TSV45 and TSV55 group compared to the CON group in the parameters (tensionps, tensionpo and weight) of the soleus.

Zoom
Fig. 5 a Contractile tension in soleus muscle, the peak twitch tension (tensionps)* p<0.05 b Contractile tension in soleus muscle, maximum tetanic tension (tensionpo)* p<0.05 c Wet mass of soleus* p<0.05.

Ascertaining the biomechanical properties of the femur using 3 -point bending test

In the TS group, maximum load, break load, bending rigidity, stiffness and Young’s modulus were significantly decreased compared to the CON and TSV35 group, while there were no significant differences between the TSV35 and CON group. In the TSV45 and TSV55 group, maximum load, bending rigidity and stiffness were significantly decreased compared to the CON group ([Fig. 6]).

Zoom
Fig. 6 a Biomechanical parameter (max load) of femur* p<0.05 b Biomechanical parameter (break load) of femur* p<0.05 c Biomechanical parameter (stiffness) of femur* p<0.05 d Biomechanical parameter (Young’s modulus) of femur* p<0.05 e Biomechanical parameter (bending rigidity) of femur* p<0.05.

Ash weight

Ascertaining bone ash weight is used to assess the proportion of inorganic substances such as minerals vs. organic bone material. The ratio of ash weight (AW) of the left femur and tibia is shown in [Fig. 7]. The TS group showed significantly lower values compared to the CON, TSV35 and TSV45 group. There was no significant difference in the TSV35, TSV45 or TSV55 group compared to the CON group.

Zoom
Fig. 7 a Ash weight percentage of left femur* p<0.05 b Ash weight percentage of left tibia* p<0.05.

Correlation between biomechanical parameters and microstructural parameters of the femur

Our results showed that biomechanical parameters (e. g. maximum load, break load and Young’s modulus) were correlated with BMD and microstructural parameters of femurs. Furthermore, Young’s modulus was highly correlated with not only trabecular BMD but also microstructural parameters. Similarly, maximum load and microstructural parameters (e. g. BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th and SMI) were highly correlated, while there was low correlation between break load and microstructural parameters or BMD ([Table 2]).

Table 2 Descriptive correlation coefficients r of femur.

Maximum load

p

Break load

p

Young’s modulus

p

BMDTrab

0.66

0.011

0.45

0.097

0.82

0.000

BMDCort

0.19

0.390

0.25

0.271

0.61

0.053

BV/TV

0.70

0.002

0.49

0.069

0.89

0.000

Tb.N

0.70

0.000

0.52

0.072

0.86

0.000

Tb.Th

0.67

0.000

0.56

0.055

0.86

0.000

Tb.Sp

−0.54

0.041

−0.45

0.154

−0.74

0.001

SMI

−0.72

0.000

−0.49

0.068

−0.83

0.000

Pearson correlation analyses were used to assess the correlation


Tensile testing of tendons

In the TS group, Young’s modulus, fracture deflection and break stress were decreased significantly compared to CON and TSV35 group. In the TSV55 group, break stress was significantly decreased compared to CON group. None of the calculated parameters showed any significant differences among the TSV35, TSV45 and CON groups ([Table 3]).

Table 3 Biomechanical parameters of the Achilles tendon.

CON

TS

TSV35

TSV45

TSV55

Maximum load (N)

29.43±14.9

23.47±12.45

31.48±7.16*

24.94±13.63

23.52±10.34

Break load (N)

24.31±14.43

16.37±11.37

25.45±7.04

18.89±9.64

19.12±8.63

Young’s modulus (N/mm2)

167.00±65.20*

84.12±13.48

153.12±53.12*

110.62±22

114.61±25.36

Fracture deflection (N/mm2)

3.18±2.94*

2.04±0.78

2.41±0.25*

2.09±0.24

2.31±0.39

Break stress (mm)

2.21±0.4*

1.4±0.12

1.67±0.17*

1.74±0.14*

1.68±0.18*﹟

Values are mean±SD. Statistical tests were performed with univariate analysis. *indicates significant difference vs. TS, ﹟ indicates significant difference vs. CON (p<0.05)



Discussion

Most studies demonstrated that high-frequency, low-amplitude vibration have a positive effect on rat trabecular bone [6] [22] [36] [37] [42]. Recent studies also suggested that vibration could be used to prevent skeletal fragility in populations at risk of spinal cord injury [2] [4]. Moreover, the previous studies indicated that 30–60 Hz (0.1–2 g) WBV was capable of preventing bone loss in human and animal models [32]. These data from human [19] [34] and animal [49] models also showed that such vibration stimulus could increase the bone mineral density and enhance the muscle force. Therefore, 35, 45 and 55 Hz (0.3 g) vibration were accordingly chosen in this study. Consistent with previous studies, this study showed that localize vibration of 35, 45 and 55 Hz could counteract the disuse-induced BMD decrease in trabecular bone resulting from the unloading of the hind limb. As for trabecular microstructure, it could be better preserved in unloaded hind limb through 35 Hz vibration than 45 or 55 Hz.

Bone ash weight can be used to assess the proportion of inorganic substances. In our study, three vibration models were able to counteract the decrease of bone mineralization. For bone strength, our findings suggested that 35 Hz of vibration was better than 45 or 55 Hz in preventing the deterioration of bone biomechanical properties induced by TS. Moreover, biomechanical parameters and microstructural parameters were closely related, which proved that not only BMD but also microstructure could affect the biomechanical properties of bone. These findings supported previous studies that the microstructural parameters could be used to predict the biomechanical properties of trabecular bone [11] [46]. Meanwhile, the microstructural parameters also might be used to predict the effects of microgravity on biomechanical properties of bone.

There has been some research on the effects of vibration on the hind limb muscles. In some studies, the dry defatted weight of the soleus and the gastrocnemius were not influenced by WBV in the ovariectomy rats [31], and WBV at 45 Hz (0.3 g) decreased capillarity in the soleus of mouse [30]. However, Xie et al. found that WBV at 45 Hz could significantly increase the cross-sectional area and muscle fiber number of the soleus in rats [48]. Yang et al. found that high-frequency WBV could counteract the changes in expression of myosin heavy chain in intrafusal and extrafusal fibers in the rat soleus under weightlessness [50]. Our study showed that local vibration at 35, 45 and 55 Hz could counteract the decrease not only in soleus weight but also the soleus contractile strength of rats subjected to tail suspension.

The Achilles tendon can withstand high tension generated by muscle contraction and transmit the muscle contractile strength to drive the joint activities, which is important for maintaining normal movements. Weightlessness, disuse and other factors have attenuated the biomechanical properties of The Achilles tendon in both rats [3] [13] and human [33]. High-frequency vibration could improve the biomechanical properties of the Achilles tendon and prevent Achilles tendon injury induced by immobilization in rats [27] [38] [43] or humans [43]. Sandhu’s research additionally showed that WBV could improve the biomechanical properties of the tendon, while having no effect on the rat muscle [38]. Our findings support the aforementioned studies. In our study, 35 Hz vibration was better than 45 and 55 Hz on the biomechanical properties of Achilles tendon, although there were no marked differences among the frequencies on counteracting tail-suspension-induced muscle atrophy. The vibration-induced improvement in the biomechanical properties of this specific tendon may be attributed to factors other than muscle amelioration.

In general, this study suggests that localized high-frequency vibration on the hind limb is useful in counteracting musculoskeletal degeneration induced by tail suspension. Furthermore, localized vibration might be a promising countermeasure or alternative to exercise for preventing bone loss during extended space flight.



Acknowledgements

This work was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31170897) and Nationnal Basic Research Program of China (No. 2011CB710901). Conflicts of interest: The authors state that they have no conflicts of interests.


Correspondence

Prof. Yu bo Fan
Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education
School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering
Beihang University
No. 37
Xueyuan
Road Haidian district
Beijing 100191
China   
Phone: +86/10/82339 428   
Fax: +86/10/82339 428   


Zoom
Fig. 1 a Diagram of custom-made vibration training device for the tail-suspended (TS)-rat b Photograph showing TS-rat during exercise on the device in the laboratory. The rat’s trunk was placed in a fixed box (30° angle) and hind paws were fixed by adhesives on the stepper footplates. When vibration training was performed, training was initiated by a motor connected to an eccentric bearing.
Zoom
Fig. 2 a Trabecular BMD of femur by µCT* p<0.05 b Trabecular BMD of tibia by µCT* p<0.05 c Cortical BMD of femur by µCT d Cortical BMD of tibia by µCT.
Zoom
Fig. 3 a Trabecular microstructural parameter (BV/TV) of femur by µCT* p<0.05 b Trabecular microstructural parameter (BS/BV) of femur by µCT* p<0.05 c Trabecular microstructural parameter (Tb.N) of femur by µCT* p<0.05 d Trabecular microstructural parameter (Tb.Sp) of femur by µCT* p<0.05 e Trabecular microstructural parameter (Tb.Th) of femur by µCT* p<0.05 f Trabecular microstructural parameter (SMI) of femur by µCT* p<0.05.
Zoom
Fig. 4 a Cross-Sectional Area (CSA) of whole rat right calf muscle by µCT*p<0.05 b Cross-Sectional Area (CSA) of whole rat left calf muscle by µCT* p<0.05.
Zoom
Fig. 5 a Contractile tension in soleus muscle, the peak twitch tension (tensionps)* p<0.05 b Contractile tension in soleus muscle, maximum tetanic tension (tensionpo)* p<0.05 c Wet mass of soleus* p<0.05.
Zoom
Fig. 6 a Biomechanical parameter (max load) of femur* p<0.05 b Biomechanical parameter (break load) of femur* p<0.05 c Biomechanical parameter (stiffness) of femur* p<0.05 d Biomechanical parameter (Young’s modulus) of femur* p<0.05 e Biomechanical parameter (bending rigidity) of femur* p<0.05.
Zoom
Fig. 7 a Ash weight percentage of left femur* p<0.05 b Ash weight percentage of left tibia* p<0.05.