Download PDF
Klinische Neurophysiologie 2013; 44(04): 223-234
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1349672
Fort- und Weiterbildung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Neurorehabilitation nach Schlaganfall: Überblick über die gegenwärtigen Konzepte und Ausblick in die Zukunft

Neurorehabilitation after Stroke: Review of Current Concepts and Future Developments
J. Liepert
Abteilung Neurorehabilitation, Kliniken Schmieder, Allensbach
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 December 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Lernziele

Kenntnisse über bereits etablierte Konzepte vor allem der motorischen Rehabilitation:

  • allgemeine Prinzipien

  • allgemeine Konzepte und

  • spezifische Therapieansätze

außerdem:

  • innovative, aber bislang noch nicht flächendeckend in der Neurorehabilitation eingesetzte Verfahren

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B et al. Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke 2005; 36: e100-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th. edition. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of patients with stroke: Rehabilitation, prevention and management of complications, and discharge planning. A national clinical guideline. 2010. www.sign.ac.uk
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Platz T. Rehabilitative Therapie bei Armparese nach Schlaganfall. Neurol Rehabil 2009; 15: 81-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Diener HC, Weimar C Hrsg. Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. 5.. Auflage: Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2012
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ackermann H, Schönle PW, Fries W et al. Multiprofessionelle neurologische Rehabilitation. In: Diener HC, Weimar C, Hrsg. Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. 5.. Auflage: Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2012: 1044-1050
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Momsen AM, Rasmussen JO, Nielsen CV et al. Multidisciplinary team care in rehabilitation: an overview of reviews. J Rehabil Med 2012; 44: 901-912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A et al. A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial for Stroke (AVERT). Stroke 2008; 39: 390-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sorbello D, Dewey HM, Churilov L et al. Very early mobilisation and complications in the first 3 months after stroke: further results from phase II of A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT). Cerebrovascular Diseases 2009; 28: 378-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Craig LE, Bernhardt J, Langhorne P et al. Early mobilization after stroke: an example of an individual patient data meta-analysis of a complex intervention. Stroke 2010; 41: 2632-2636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cumming TB, Thrift AG, Collier JM et al. Very early mobilization after stroke fast-tracks return to walking: further results from the phase II AVERT randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2011; 42: 153-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sundseth A, Thommessen B, Rønning OM. Early Mobilization after Acute Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sundseth A, Thommessen B, Rønning OM. Outcome after mobilization within 24 hours of acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2012; 43: 2389-2394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hesse S, Enzinger C, George S et al. Technische Hilfsmittel. In: Diener HC, Weimar C, Hrsg. Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. 5.. Auflage: Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2012: 1150-1160
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 15 French B, Thomas L, Leathley M et al. Does repetitive task training improve functional activity after stroke? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 9-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rensink M, Schuurmans M, Lindeman E et al. Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65: 737-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377: 1693-1702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004; 35: 2529-2539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Starrost K, Liepert J. Virtuelle Realität in der neurologischen Rehabilitation. In: Dettmers C, Stephan KM, Hrsg. Motorische Therapie nach Schlaganfall. Von der Physiotherapie bis zu den Leitlinien. Bad Honnef: Hippocampus Verlag; 2011: 178-188
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Laver KE, George S, Thomas S et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (09) Art. No.: CD008349
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Barclay-Goddard RE, Stevenson TJ, Poluha W et al. Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; CD005950
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ietswaart M, Johnston M, Dijkerman HC et al. Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain 2011; 134: 1373-1386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kollen BJ, Lennon S, Lyons B et al. The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence?. Stroke 2009; 40: e89-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tyson SF, Connell LA, Busse ME et al. What is Bobath? A survey of UK stroke physiotherapists' perceptions of the content of the Bobath concept to treat postural control and mobility problems after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 448-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Legg LA, Drummond AE, Langhorne P. Occupational therapy for patients with problems in activities of daily living after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD003585
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Simpson DM, Gracies JM, Graham HK et al. Assessment: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of spasticity (an evidence-based review): report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2008; 70: 1691-1698
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Muller F et al. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Lancet 2001; 358: 87-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Chollet F, Tardy J, Albucher JF et al. Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 123-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mikami K, Jorge RE, Adams HP et al. Effect of antidepressants on the course of disability following stroke. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011; 19: 1007-1015
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Urban PP, Wolf T, Uebele M et al. Occurence and clinical predictors of spasticity after ischemic stroke. Stroke 2010; 41: 2016-2020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Liepert J, Curt A, Heise KF et al. Therapie des spastischen Syndroms. In: Diener HC, Weimar C, Hrsg. Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. 5.. Auflage: Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2012: 1062-1071
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Katalinic O, Harvey L, Herbert R et al. Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures. The Cochrane Collaboration 2010; 1-128
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Olvey EL, Armstrong EP, Grizzle AJ. Contemporary pharmacologic treatments for spasticity of the upper limb after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Ther 2010; 32: 2282-2303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Rosales RL, Chua-Yap AS. Evidence-based systematic review on the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin-A therapy in post-stroke spasticity. J Neural Transm 2008; 115: 617-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 McIntyre A, Lee T, Janzen S et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in the treatment of spasticity of the hemiparetic lower extremity more than six months post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2012; 19: 479-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Foley N, Pereira S, Salter K et al. Treatment with botulinum toxin improves upper-extremity function post stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94: 977-989
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Gialanella B, Santoro R, Ferlucci C. Predicting outcome after stroke: the role of basic activities of daily living. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2012; May 28. [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Barrett AM, Goedert KM, Basso JC. Prism adaptation for spatial neglect after stroke: translational practice gaps. Nat Rev Neurol 2012; 8: 567-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yang NY, Zhou D, Chung RC et al. Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 187 doi: DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00187.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Schindler I, Kerkhoff G, Karnath HO et al. Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73: 412-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Johannsen L, Ackermann H, Karnath HO. Lasting amelioration of spatial neglect by treatment with neck muscle vibration even without concurrent training. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 249-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Kamada K, Shimodozono M, Hamada H et al. Effects of 5 minutes of neck-muscle vibration immediately before occupational therapy on unilateral spatial neglect. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 2322-2328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Schindler I, Kerkhoff G. Convergent and divergent effects of neck proprioceptive and visual motion stimulation on visual space processing in neglect. Neuropsychologia 2004; 42: 1149-1155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Mylius V, Ayache SS, Zouari HG et al. Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: hemispatial neglect. Expert Rev Neurother 2012; 12: 983-991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Cazzoli D, Müri RM, Schumacher R et al. Theta burst stimulation reduces disability during the activities of daily living in spatial neglect. Brain 2012; 135: 3426-3439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Särkämö T, Soto D. Music listening after stroke: beneficial effects and potential neural mechanisms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012; 1252: 266-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Thieme H, Bayn M, Wurg M et al. Mirror therapy for patients with severe arm paresis after stroke – a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2013; 27: 314-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Machner B, Dorr M, Sprenger A et al. Impact of dynamic bottom-up features and top-down control on the visual exploration of moving real-world scenes in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2012; 50: 2415-2425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Ansuini C, Pierno AC, Lusher D et al. Virtual reality applications for the remapping of space in neglect patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2006; 24: 431-441
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347-354
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Peurala SH, Kantanen MP, Sjögren T et al. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy on activity and participation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 2012; 26: 209-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL et al. Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS): A single-center RCT. Neurology 2009; 73: 195-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Myint JM, Yuen GF, Yu TK et al. A study of constraint-induced movement therapy in subacute stroke patients in Hong Kong. Clin Rehabil 2008; 22: 112-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Dahl AE, Askim T, Stock R et al. Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Clin Rehabil 2008; 22: 436-447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Brunner IC, Skouen JS, Strand LI. Is modified constraint-induced movement therapy more effective than bimanual training in improving arm motor function in the subacute phase post stroke? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2012; 26: 1078-1086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Nijland R, Kwakkel G, Bakers J et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for the upper paretic limb in acute or sub-acute stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke 2011; 6: 425-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Shi YX, Tian JH, Yang KH et al. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus traditional rehabilitation in patients with upper-extremity dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 972-982
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Thieme H, Mehrholz J, Pohl M et al. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (3) CD008449
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Mehrholz J, Hädrich A, Platz T et al. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (6) CD006876
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Liepert J. [Evidence-based methods in motor rehabilitation after stroke]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2012; 80: 388-393
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Coupar F, Pollock A, van Wijck F et al. Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (04) CD006432
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 van Delden AEO, Peper CE, Beek PJ et al. Unilateral versus bilateral upper limb exercise therapy after stroke: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2012; 44: 106-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Veerbeek JM, Koolstra M, Ket JC et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy on outcome of gait and gait-related activities in the first 6 months after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2011; 42: 3311-3315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Brazzelli M, Saunders DH, Greig CA et al. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (11) CD003316
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Rose D, Paris T, Crews E et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of circuit training in acute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 140-148
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 van de Port IG, Wevers LE, Lindeman E et al. Effects of circuit training as alternative to usual physiotherapy after stroke: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2012; 344: e2672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Mackay-Lyons M, McDonald A, Matheson J et al. Dual Effects of Body-Weight Supported Treadmill Training on Cardiovascular Fitness and Walking Ability Early After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Mehrholz J, Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted gait training after stroke: a systematic review comparing end-effector and exoskeleton devices. J Rehabil Med 2012; 44: 193-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman AL et al. Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2026-2036
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Moseley AM, Stark A, Cameron ID et al. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (04) CD002840
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Bowden MG, Woodbury ML, Duncan PW. Promoting neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke: future directions for rehabilitation clinical trials. Curr Opin Neurol 2013; 26: 37-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Brewer L, Horgan F, Hickey A et al. Stroke rehabilitation: recent advances and future therapies. QJM 2013; 106: 11-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Iosa M, Morone G, Fusco A et al. Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res Treat 2012; 2012: 187965
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Takeuchi N, Izumi S. Maladaptive plasticity for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and approaches. Neural Plast 2012; 2012: 359728
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Ameli M, Grefkes C, Kemper F et al. Differential effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex in cortical and subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. Ann Neurol 2009; 66: 298-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Adeyemo BO, Simis M, Macea DD et al. Systematic review of parameters of stimulation, clinical trial design characteristics, and motor outcomes in non-invasive brain stimulation in stroke. Front Psychiatry 2012; 3: 88
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Bastani A, Jaberzadeh S. Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123: 644-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Corti M, Patten C, Triggs W. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex after stroke: a focused review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 91: 254-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Hao Z, Wang D, Zeng Y et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (05) CD008862
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Rodriguez-de-Pablo C, Perry JC, Cavallaro FI et al. Development of computer games for assessment and training in post-stroke arm telerehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012; 2012: 4571-4574
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Luft AR. How to gain evidence in neurorehabilitation: a personal view. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2012; 57: 427-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Langan J, Delave K, Phillips L et al. Home-based telerehabilitation shows improved upper limb function in adults with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med 2013; 45: 217-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Cikajlo I, Rudolf M, Goljar N et al. Telerehabilitation using virtual reality task can improve balance in patients with stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34: 13-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Krpič A, Savanović A, Cikajlo I. Telerehabilitation: remote multimedia-supported assistance and mobile monitoring of balance training outcomes can facilitate the clinical staff's effort. Int J Rehabil Res 2013; 36: 162-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Deng H, Durfee WK, Nuckley DJ et al. Complex versus simple ankle movement training in stroke using telerehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther 2012; 92: 197-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Chumbler NR, Quigley P, Li X et al. Effects of telerehabilitation on physical function and disability for stroke patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 2012; 43: 2168-2174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar