Drug Res (Stuttg) 2013; 63(11): 551-557
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1347236
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bioequivalence of Two Lansoprazole Delayed Release Capsules 30 mg in Healthy Male Volunteers under Fasting, Fed and Fasting-applesauce conditions: A Partial Replicate Crossover Study Design to Estimate the Pharmacokinetics of Highly Variable Drugs

S. Thota
1   Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics, Integrated Product Development, Dr.Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, Hyderabad, India
,
S. M. Khan
1   Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics, Integrated Product Development, Dr.Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, Hyderabad, India
,
S. K. Tippabhotla
1   Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics, Integrated Product Development, Dr.Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, Hyderabad, India
,
R. Battula
1   Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics, Integrated Product Development, Dr.Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, Hyderabad, India
,
C. Gadiko
1   Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics, Integrated Product Development, Dr.Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, Hyderabad, India
,
V. Vobalaboina
1   Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics, Integrated Product Development, Dr.Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, Hyderabad, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 13 February 2013

accepted 09 May 2013

Publication Date:
18 June 2013 (online)

Abstract

An open-label, 2-treatment, 3-sequence, 3-period, single-dose, partial replicate crossover studies under fasting (n=48), fed (n=60) and fasting-applesauce (n=48) (sprinkled on one table spoonful of applesauce) modalities were conducted in healthy adult male volunteers to evaluate bioequivalence between 2 formulations of lansoprazole delayed release capsules 30 mg. In all the 3 studies, as per randomization, either test or reference formulations were administered in a crossover manner with a required washout period of at least 7 days. Blood samples were collected adequately (0–24 h) to determine lansoprazole plasma concentrations using a validated LC-MS/MS analytical method. To characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, Tmax, Kel and T1/2) of lansoprazole, non-compartmental analysis and ANOVA was applied on ln-transformed values. The bioequivalence was tested based on within-subject variability of the reference formulation. In fasting and fed studies (within-subject variability>30%) bioequivalence was evaluated with scaled average bioequivalence, hence for the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞, the 95% upper confidence bound for (μT−μR)2−θσ2 WR was ≤0, and the point estimates (test-to-reference ratio) were within the regulatory acceptance limit 80.00–125.00%. In fasting-applesauce study (within-subject variability<30%) bioequivalence was evaluated with average bioequivalence, the 90% CI of ln-transformed data of Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were within the regulatory acceptance limit 80.00–125.00%. Based on these aforesaid statistical inferences, it was concluded that the test formulation is bioequivalent to reference formulation.

 
  • References

  • 1 Dugger HA, Carlson JD, Henderson W et al. Bioequivalence evaluation of lansoprazole 30–mg capsules (Lanfast and Lanzor) in healthy volunteers. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2001; 51: 153-157
  • 2 Hu YR, Qiao HL, Kan QC. Pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole in Chinese healthy subjects in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2004; 25: 986-990
  • 3 Chandira M, Venkateswarlu BS Dhananjay et al. Bioequivalence study of antiulcer drug lansoprazole delayed release capsules 30mg in healthy adult male human subjects under fed condition. Der Pharmacia Lettre 2010; 2: 440-456
  • 4 Prevacid (lansoprazole) delayed release capsules. US prescribing information. 2012 http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/020406s078-021428s025lbl.pdf Accessed February 2, 2013
  • 5 Van Peer A. Variability and Impact on Design of Bioequivalence Studies. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2010; 106: 146-53
  • 6 Tothfalusi L, Endrenyi L, Arieta AG. Evaluation of Bioequivalence for Highly Variable Drugs with Scaled Average Bioequivalence. Clin Pharmacokinet 2009; 48: 725-743
  • 7 Haidar SH, Makhlouf F, Schuirmann DJ et al. Evaluation of a scaling approach for the bioequivalence of highly variable drugs. The AAPS Journal 2008; 10: 450-454
  • 8 Chow SC, Endrenyi L, Chi E et al. Statistical Issues in Bioavailability/Bioequivalence Studies. J Bioequiv Availab 2011; S1: 1-8
  • 9 Hyslop T, Iglewicz B. Alternative Cross-over Designs for Individual Bioequivalence. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, 2001
  • 10 Endrenyi L, Tothfalusi L. Regulatory and study conditions for the determination of bioequivalence of highly variable drugs. J Pharm Pharmceut Sci 2009; 12: 138-149
  • 11 Tran A, Rey E, Pons G et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study of oral lansoprazole in children. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; 71: 359-367
  • 12 Sharma VK, Ugheoke EA, Vasudeva R et al. The pharmacodynamics of lansoprazole administered via gastrostomy as intact, non-encapsulated granules. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998; 12: 1171-1174
  • 13 Chun AH, Eason CJ, Shi HH et al. Lansoprazole: an alternative method of administration of a capsule dosage formulation. Clin Ther 1995; 17: 441-447
  • 14 United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA). Draft guidance on lansoprazole delayed release capsules/oral. Finalized Oct 2011 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM162431.pdf Accessed February 2, 2013
  • 15 Jovanovic D, Kilibarda V, Maksimovic M. A bioavailability/bioequivalence study of two oral lansoprazole formulations after single administration to healthy volunteers. Pharmazie 2001; 56: 800-802