Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000089.xml
Ultraschall Med 2013; 34(5): 422-434
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1335843
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1335843
Fort- und Weiterbildung
Ultraschall Emissionen: Thermische (TI) und mechanische (MI) Indizes
Authors
Further Information
Publication History
16 May 2012
21 April 2013
Publication Date:
16 July 2013 (online)
Fortbildungsziele
-
Kenntnis des allgemeinen Expositionskonzepts und dessen Anwendung
-
Erkennen der Grenzen des Konzepts und dessen Kehrseiten
-
Kenntnis der damit verbundenen Konsequenzen für die Sicherheit
-
Kenntnis der Grenzwerte für TI/MI, die einen Handlungsbedarf nach sich ziehen
-
Literatur
- 1 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Standard for Real-time Display of Thermal and Mechanical Acoustic Output Indices on Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment. 1st rev. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 1998. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, 1993, Revised 510(k) Diagnostic Ultrasound Guidance for 1993.
- 2 IEC 62359. Ultrasonics – Field characterization – Test methods for the determination of thermal and mechanical indices related to medical diagnostic ultrasonic fields. International Standard IEC 62359 Ed.2.0, Geneva: 2010-10.
- 3 Abbott JG. Rationale and derivation of MI and TI: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 431-441
- 4 Martin K. The acoustic safety of new ultrasound technologies. Ultrasound 2010; 18: 110-118
- 5 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: I. Criteria based on thermal mechanisms. NCRP Report No. 113 Bethesda MD: NCRP; 1992
- 6 Ter HG. Results of a Survey of Exposure Conditions used in Ultrasound Scans in the UK, February 2007. Ultrasound 2008; 16: 110-113
- 7 BMUS. Guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound equipment. Safety Group of the British Medical Ultrasound Society. 2009 www.bmus.org
- 8 ECMUS Safety committee. Clinical Safety Statement for Diagnostic Ultrasound. EFSUMB. www.efsumb.org
- 9 ECMUS. Safety committee Guidelines. EFSUMB. www.efsumb.org
- 10 Maršál K. The output display standard: has it missed its target?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 211-4
- 11 Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Abramowicz JS. What do clinical users know regarding safety of ultrasound during pregnancy?. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 319-325
- 12 Akhtar W, Arain MA, Ali A et al. Ultrasound biosafety during pregnancy: what do operators know in the developing world?: national survey findings from Pakistan. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 981-985
- 13 Houston LE, Allsworth J, Macones GA. Ultrasound is safe... right? Resident and maternal-fetal medicine fellow knowledge regarding obstetric ultrasound safety. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 21-27