The School to Home Link: Summer Preschool and Parents

Abstract

This study investigates the amount of language available to children in the home environment and a summer preschool program. The purpose of this study was twofold. First, the study sought to gain information about patterns of language use among families of preschoolers with hearing loss. Additionally, the project was designed to provide an initial investigation into the impact of reduced educational programming over summer months for children with hearing loss. Children with varying degrees of hearing loss were enrolled in an auditory-oral 6-week part-time program. The language environment during preschool and at home was analyzed through use of Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA). LENA is a digital language processor that can record and analyze through specific measurements the natural language environment of a child. Overall, the children studied received significantly more complex language in preschool than in the home environment. The data suggest that children with hearing loss benefit from the opportunity to attend summer preschool programming. Additionally, it is critical that parents of preschoolers continue to receive parental education surrounding use of language strategies in the home environment. Implications for practice are discussed.

Keywords

Summer preschool - parental education - language environment - hearing loss

• References

• 1 Yoshinaga-Itano C. Levels of evidence: universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and early hearing detection and intervention systems (EHDI). J Commun Disord 2004; 37: 451-465
• 2 Hart B, Risley T. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1995
• 3 Yoshinaga-Itano C. From screening to early identification and intervention: discovering predictors to successful outcomes for children with significant hearing loss. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2003; 8: 11-30
• 4 Young A, Tattersall H. Universal newborn hearing screening and early identification of deafness: parents' responses to knowing early and their expectations of child communication development. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2007; 12: 209-220
• 5 Yoshinaga-Itano C, Ruberry J, Stredler-Brown A. Colorado Individual Performance Profile: preschool pre-CIPP. Semin Hear 1995; 16: 151-165
• 6 White W. Reviews before and after vacation. Am Educ 1906; 10: 185-188
• 7 Entwisle D, Alexander K. Summer setback: race, poverty, school composition, and mathematics achievement in the first two years of school. Am Sociol Rev 1993; 57: 72-84
• 8 Cooper H, Nye B, Charlton K, Lindsay J, Greathouse S. The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: a narrative and meta-analytic review. Rev Educ Res 1996; 66: 227-268
• 9 Downey D, von Hippel P, Broh B. Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. Am Sociol Rev 2004; 69: 613-635
• 10 National Education Commission on Time and Learning (NECTL). Prisoners of Time. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 1994
• 11 Sargent L, Fidler D. Extended school year programs: IN support of the concept. Educ Train Ment Retard 1996; 22: 3-9
• 12 Katsiyannis A. Extended school year policies: an established necessity. Remedial Spec Educ 1991; 12: 24-28
• 13 Cooper H, Charlton K, Valentine JC, Muhlenbruck L. Making the most of summer school: a meta-analytic and narrative review. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 2000; 65: i-v , 1–118; discussion 119–127
• 14 Alexander KL, Entwisle DR, Olson LS. Lasting consequences of the summer learning gap. Am Sociol Rev 2007; 2: 167-180
• 15 Alexander KL, Entwisle DR, Olson LS. Summer learning and its implications: insights from the Beginning School Study. New Dir Youth Dev 2007; 114: 11-32
• 16 Girolametto L, Weitzman E. It takes two to talk—the Hanen Program for parents: early language intervention through caregiver training. In: McCauley RJ, Fey ME, , eds. Treatment of Language Disorders in Children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2006: 77-103
• 17 Law J, Garrett Z, Nye C. The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: a meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004; 47: 924-943
• 18 Hansen JL. Robust speech processing: is there a way to measure the words a child hears?. In: Montgomery J, , Chair. Language Assessment in Natural Environments. Panel Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Speech and Hearing Association; Chicago, IL. November 20, 2008
• 19 Lena Foundation. The LENA Foundation: Case study. Available at: http://www.infoture.org/Research.aspx . Accessed on April 14, 2012
• 20 Xu D, Yapanel U, Gray S. Reliability of the LENA Language Environment Analysis System in young children's natural home environment. Boulder, CO: LENA Foundation. Available at: http:www.lenafoundation.org/Research/TechnicalReports.aspx . Accessed on April 2, 2012
• 21 Gilkerson J, Coulter K, Richards JA. Transcriptional analyses of the LENA Foundation Natural Language Corpus (LENA Foundation Technical Report No. LTR-06–2). Available at: http://www.lenafoundation.org/TechReport.aspx/Transcription/LTR-06-2 . Accessed on March 20, 2012
• 22 Timmons V. Challenges in researching family literacy programs. Can Psychol 2008; 49: 96-102
• 23 Estabrooks W. Auditory-Verbal Therapy and Practice. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing; 2006
• 24 Weil LW, Middleton L. Use of the LENA tool to evaluate the effectiveness of a parent intervention program. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education. 2010; 17: 108-111