Comparison between tungsten and steel polypectomy snares: evaluation of depth of colonic thermal wall injury in a pig model

Background and study aims: Thermal injury of the colonic wall during polypectomy may induce complications such as bleeding and perforation. To date, the role of the snare material in these injuries has not been examined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the depth of colonic post-polypectomy thermal wall injury induced by tungsten and steel endoscopic snares, in an effort to reduce electrosurgery-related complications.

Materials and methods: This was a single tertiary center experimental study in a porcine model. A total of 90 polypectomies where performed in three live pigs under general anesthesia, using both steel and tungsten snares by cut, coagulation, and blend current modes. The pigs were then euthanized and their colons examined histologically.

Results: Steel snares induced significantly deeper tissue injury than tungsten snares in the pure cut mode (Pearson χ ² = 6.136, P = 0.013). The ordinal logistic regression analysis showed that the current mode and snare material were significantly associated with the ordinal score for the depth of injury. Thus, cut mode was positively associated with a lower score and coagulation mode with a higher score. In addition, tungsten was significantly associated with a lower depth of tissue injury.

Conclusions: Due to its inherent electrical properties, tungsten is very well suited for manufacture into electrosurgical endoscopic devices. Thus, tungsten snares may be advantageous for routine use in endoscopic polypectomy, although further studies are needed to confirm these promising findings in human patients.

• References

• 1 Macrae FA, Tan KG, Williams CB. Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies. Gut 1983; 24: 376-383
• 2 Waye JD, Lewis BS, Yessayan S. Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications. J Clin Gastroenterol 1997; 15: 347-351
• 3 Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: lessons to learn from and experience of 1576 polyps. Am Surg 1988; 54: 61-63
• 4 Parra-Blanco A, Kaminaga N, Kojima T et al. Hemoclipping for postpolypectomy and postbiopsy colonic bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 37-41
• 5 Chino A, Karasawa T, Uragami N et al. A comparison of depth of tissue injury caused by different modes of electrosurgical current in a pig colon model. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 374-379
• 6 Meola C, Carlomagno GM. Recent advances in the use of infrared thermography. Meas Sci Technol 2004; 15: 27-58
• 7 Meola C, Carlomagno GM. Application of infrared thermography to adhesion science. J Adhes Sci Technol 2006; 20: 589-632
• 8 Parra-Blanco A, Kaminaga N, Kojima T et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy with cutting current: is it safe?. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 676-681
• 9 Van Gossum A, Cozzoli A, Adler M et al. Colonoscopic snare polypectomy: analysis of 1485 resections comparing two types of current. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 472-475