Key words
impaired fasting glucose - prediabetes - aortic stiffness - strain - distensibility
- cardiovascular risk
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder with increased morbidity and mortality
and increases the risk of coronary artery disease [1]. However, it is considered that the atherosclerotic process begins before the onset
of overt diabetes.
The evaluation of elastic properties of the aorta by non-invasive methods is an easily
measurable method in the early diagnosis of atherosclerosis. It has been reported
that arterial stiffness is a good predictor of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity
[2]. The structural changes in the arterial wall as a result of diabetes have negative
effects on arterial compliance and stiffness [3]
[4]
[5].
There are a number of studies reporting increased arterial stiffness in diabetes mellitus
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]. On the contrary, there are few studies investigating aortic elastic properties
in patients with impaired oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) [10]
[12]
[13]. In this study, aortic strain, distensibility and stiffness index indicating elastic
properties of the aorta in patients with normal OGTT but impaired fasting glucose
were compared to that in healthy subjects.
Materials and Methods
50 patients (23 male, age 43±9) who were admitted to our clinic for various reasons
and who had normal OGTT but impaired fasting glucose with values between 100–126 mg/dl
on routine biochemical tests were enrolled in this study. The exclusion criteria were
patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, and cardiac valve disease, a
history of cerebrovascular disease, collagen tissue disease, dyslipidemia, tobacco
and alcohol use and impaired OGTT. The control group consisted of 50 age and sex matched
healthy subjects (29 male, age 41±9) with fasting blood glucose below 100 mg/dl. All
patients were imaged in the left lateral decubitus position using a GE VingMed Vivid
FiVe echocardiography device. M-Mode images were obtained at a level of 3 cm proximal
to the aortic valve from a parasternal long axis view. Rhythm recordings were made
during echocardiographic examination in all patients. The end diastolic aortic diameter
was measured at the peak of QRS in M-mode images. Maximum aortic wall thickness was
also measured in the same cycle and used as aortic systolic diameter. After echocardiographic
examination, blood pressure was measured non-invasively in the brachial artery in
all patients. Based on the obtained data, aortic strain, aortic stiffness and aortic
distensibility were calculated using the formula below [11]:
-
Strain (%)=100×(aortic systolic diameter – aortic diastolic diameter)/Aortic diastolic
diameter
-
Distensibility (cm
2
×dyn
− 1
×10
-6)=(2×strain)/(Systolic blood pressure − diastolic blood pressure)
-
Stiffness index=Ln (Systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure)/[(Aortic systolic diameter – aortic diastolic diameter)/Aortic diastolic diameter]
Data analyis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for
Windows 15 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative data were analyzed using the
Student-t test and qualitative data Chi-square test. Pearson’s correlation analysis
was used for correlation analyses. The results were evaluated at a significance level
of p<0.05 with a confidence interval Data analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical
Package for Social Sciences) for Windows 15 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative
data were analyzed using the student-t test and qualitative of 95%.
The study protocol was approved by the university ethics committee of our institution
and written consent was taken from all participants.
Reproducibility
Relatively low intra- and interobserver variability values (8–10%) for TDI measurements
were reported previously from our laboratory [12].
Results
There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, systolic and diastolic
blood pressures, pulse rate, body mass index and body surface area between the study
and control groups ([Table 1]).
Table 1 Demographic Datas.
|
Study group (n=50)
|
Control group (n=50)
|
p
|
|
BMI: Body mass index, BSA: Body surface area, NS: Not significant
|
|
age
|
43±9
|
41±9
|
NS
|
|
male (%)
|
23 (46)
|
29 (58)
|
NS
|
|
systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
|
114±11
|
112±13
|
NS
|
|
diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
|
69±7
|
68±9
|
NS
|
|
resting heart rate (beat/min)
|
77±11
|
74±12
|
NS
|
|
BMI (kg/m
2
)
|
25.64±2.04
|
25.81±1.74
|
NS
|
|
BSA (m
2
)
|
1.85±0.13
|
1.82±0.09
|
NS
|
|
total cholesterol (mg/dl)
|
196±41
|
197±42
|
NS
|
|
triglyceride (mg/dl)
|
137±89
|
117±50
|
NS
|
|
HDL cholesterol (mg/dl)
|
48±13
|
45±11
|
NS
|
|
LDL cholesterol (mg/dl)
|
121±38
|
129±40
|
NS
|
Aortic stiffness index was found to be increased in the study group compared to the
control group (6.9±3.2 vs. 5.01±1.6) (p<0.0001) ([Table 2]).
Table 2 Aortic Parameters.
|
Study group (n=50)
|
Control group (n=50)
|
p
|
|
aortic strain (%)
|
8.78±4.3
|
10.65±2.6
|
<0.01
|
|
aortic stiffness index
|
6.90±3.2
|
5.01±1.6
|
<0.001
|
|
aortic distensibility cm
2
×dyn
− 1
×10
− 6
|
4.1±2.1
|
5.1±1.7
|
<0.01
|
Aortic strain and aortic distensibility was lower in the study group as compared to
the control group (8.78±4.3 vs. 10.65±2.6 and 4.1±2.1 vs. 5.1±1.7, respectively) (p<0.01
and p<0.01, respectively) ([Table 2]).
There was no relationship between age and aortic strain, aortic stiffness and aortic
distensibility values. No relationship was found between the measured parameters and
blood glucose levels.
Discussion
In this study, we found that arterial stiffness index was increased but aortic strain
and distensibility were decreased in subjects with impaired fasting glucose compared
to the control group. As far as we are aware, this is the first study in the literature
evaluating elastic properties of the aorta by echocardiography in the patient group
with normal OGTT but impaired fasting glucose.
Aortic stiffness is influenced by a variety of conditions. It is known that increased
arterial stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]. It was demonstrated that aortic stiffness increased with age in groups matched
for all characteristics but age [17]. Structural changes in elastin and collagen fibrils of the arterial wall during
aging may be responsible for the increased stiffness. The negative effects of aging
on aortic elastic properties were excluded since the patients included in this study
were relatively homogenous in age.
A study by Toutouzas et al. demonstrated that elastic properties of the aorta were
impaired associated with the duration of diabetes [13]. In the same study it was found that aortic elasticity was decreased as fasting
blood glucose levels increased [13]. In this study, patients with impaired fasting glucose and healthy subjects were
compared and no relationship was found between impaired fasting glucose levels and
elastic properties of the aorta, which might be caused by the fact that the patients
were newly diagnosed and thus, the time from the onset of impaired fasting glucose
differed among patients.
Another condition that is closely related to aortic elastic properties is sex. Increased
arterial stiffness is less common in women than in men. However, this is the case
with premenopausal women. The difference between the sexes decreases in postmenopausal
period [18]
[19]
[20]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that hormone replacement therapy increases
arterial compliance in postmenopausal period [21]. There was no statistical difference in the number of males and females between
the groups. The groups were compared free of the effects of sex on aortic stiffness.
The effects of menopause on elastic properties of the aorta could not be evaluated
since a sufficient number for statistical analysis could not be obtained when women
with impaired fasting glucose were categorized as premenopausal and postmenopausal.
Hypertension may also lead to impairment of the elastic properties of the aorta [13]. The arterial wall stress caused by high blood pressure leads to atherosclerosis
and structural changes. Some changes occur to the collagen and elastin fibers of the
arterial wall as a result of the mechanical effect and arterial stiffness increases
[22]
[23]. Since hypertension was an exclusion criteria in this study, we did not investigate
the relationship between high blood pressure and arterial stiffness. Additionally,
since systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and resting heart rates were
similar in our patients by routine physical examination, we can say that the subjects
in both groups have similar hemodynamics.
The detection of aortic stiffness by echocardiography indicates increased likelihood
of coronary artery disease in patients with impaired elastic properties but does not
provide a definitive diagnosis [24]. The presence of a statistically significant difference in elastic properties of
the aorta between patients with impaired fasting glucose and the control group may
suggest that impaired fasting glucose causes a significant impairment in elastic properties
of the aorta and the risk for coronary artery disease is higher in these patients
compared to normal individuals.
In a study by Xu et al., the group with impaired fasting glucose, and the group with
impaired OGTT and patients with normal plasma glucose were compared for an increase
in arterial stiffness. The brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and pulse pressure were
used as the indicators of arterial stiffness. Both pre-diabetic groups had greater
arterial stiffness compared to the control group. In the same study, patients with
impaired glucose tolerance had greater arterial stiffness compared to those with impaired
fasting glucose, which was attributed to those patients’ being more insulin resistant
[15]. In this study, the group with impaired fasting glucose and the control group with
normal plasma glucose were compared. However, since the patients with impaired glucose
tolerance were older with a worse lipid profile compared to those with impaired fasting
glucose in the study by Xu et al., it should be kept in mind that they may also cause
aortic stiffness. In this study, the groups had similar age and lipid profiles. Unlike
the mentioned study, aortic strain, aortic distensibility and β-stiffness index were
used for the prediction of arterial stiffness. However, we also obtained findings
consistent with those of Xu et al.
In another study by Rerkpattanapipat et al., 2 240 subjects with normal fasting glucose,
845 with impaired fasting glucose and 414 with diabetes, all aged 45–85 years, were
compared for total arterial stiffness, proximal thoracic aortic stiffness, left ventricular
mass and left ventricular hypertrophy. The results of the mentioned study showed no
statistically significant difference in aortic stiffness, left ventricular mass and
left ventricular hypertrophy between the group with impaired fasting glucose and the
group with normal fasting glucose. There was an increase in aortic stiffness, left
ventricular mass and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with diabetes compared
to subjects with normal fasting glucose [25]. Unlike the mentioned study, no difference was found in arterial stiffness increase
between the group with impaired fasting glucose and the control group. The difference
between the results is likely to be caused by the method used.
In a study by Topsakal et al., 47 patients with impaired glucose tolerance who had
no coronary artery disease or other cardiovascular risk factors and 32 healthy subjects
were compared. Prediabetic patients had increased aortic stiffness and decreased elasticity
compared to the controls and the findings were evaluated by tissue Doppler echocardiography
[14]. Topsakal et al. compared patients with impaired OGTT in the prediabetic group and
the control group. However, in this study, patients with impaired fasting glucose
were compared with normal subjects. The results of our study are consistent with those
by Topsakal et al. and are noteworthy in that it demonstrated that the impairment
of elastic properties of the aorta starts in the impaired fasting glucose stage, an
earlier stage than tolerance impairment.
Limitations
There are some limitations to this study. The first is the small number of patients.
Second, the extent of the impairment of elastic properties of the aorta associated
with the duration of impaired fasting glucose could not be elucidated since we were
unaware of the duration of impaired fasting glucose. We may be able to answer this
question by repeating the examinations of the same patient group after a while. Third,
Dietary habit, one of the external factors for increased arterial stiffness, has an
important effect. It has been demonstrated that saturated fatty acids and western
style diet rich in carbohydrate play role in the development of arterial stiffness
[26]. Also, a diet rich in omega 3 fatty acids has preventive effects against arterial
stiffness increase as in coronary artery disease has been reported [9]. Our patients were not questioned specifically about their diets, however, the patients
in the patient and control groups can be regarded as identical in terms of diet because
they live in the same region. However, the region itself does not allow to judge about
the dietary intake, this also depends on income and social status.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study supports that atherosclerosis starts with the impaired fasting
glucose stage in the diabetic process. The cardiovascular risk increases in the impaired
fasting glucose stage and the demonstration of impaired aortic elasticity by this
study indicates the necessity for a close cardiovascular follow-up for in these patients.
The detection of coronary artery disease in the asymptomatic period and early planning
of the required treatment strategies contribute to patient mortality and morbidity
as well as to economy in the context of preventive medicine.
