Int J Sports Med 2012; 33(04): 297-304
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1297952
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A New Tool to Measure Training Load in Soccer Training and Match Play

A. Rebelo
1   University of Porto – Faculty of Sport, Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Porto, Portugal
,
J. Brito
1   University of Porto – Faculty of Sport, Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Porto, Portugal
,
A. Seabra
1   University of Porto – Faculty of Sport, Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Porto, Portugal
,
J. Oliveira
2   University of Porto – Faculty of Sport, Research Centre for Physycal Activity, Health and Leisure, Porto, Portugal
,
B. Drust
3   LJMU, Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool, United Kingdom
,
P. Krustrup
4   University of Copenhagen, Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
5   University of Exeter, Sport and Health Sciences, Exeter, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 07 November 2011

Publication Date:
30 January 2012 (online)

Abstract

An accurate evaluation of training load is paramount for the planning and periodization of training. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between a new method to monitor training load in soccer (Visual Analogic Scale training load; VAS-TL), and two established heart rate-based methods (TRIMP and Edwards’ method). 51 soccer players (age 15.6±0.3 years) answered 2 questions to assess perceived exertion and fatigue (VAS1-TL, and VAS2-TL) after training sessions and official matches. Performance in the Yo-Yo tests, VAS scores and heart rate of training sessions and matches, and match activity were analysed. We found significant correlations (r=0.60–0.72; p<0.05) between VAS-TL, TRIMP, and the Edwards’ training load method, with the highest correlations achieved in the matches. Although the different methods to monitor training load were correlated with the distance covered during the match (r=0.53–0.78; p<0.05), only VAS1-TL was associated with high-intensity activities (r=0.43–0.54; p<0.05). The new VAS-based perceived exertion method to monitor training load is easy to apply and is sensitive to differences in positional role and physical capacity. Thus, the applied method may be used in addition to the usual training load methods, allowing for daily quantification of individual training load in soccer.

 
  • References

  • 1 Alexiou H, Coutts A. A comparison of methods used for quantifying internal training load in women soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2008; 3: 320-330
  • 2 Andersson H, Ekblom B, Krustrup P. Elite football on artificial turf versus natural grass: movement patterns, technical standards, and player impressions. J Sports Sci 2008; 26: 113-122
  • 3 Astrand P, Rodahl K. (eds.) Textbook of Work Physiology. New York: McGraw Hill; 1986: 486-522
  • 4 Banister E. Modeling elite athletic performance. In: Wenger D, Green H. (eds.) Physiological testing of the high-performance athlete. Illinois: Human Kinetics Books; 1991: 403-424
  • 5 Bangsbo J. Yo-Yo Tests. Copenhagen: HO + STORM; 1996
  • 6 Bangsbo J, Mohr M, Poulsen A, Perez-Gomez J, Krustrup P. Training and testing the elite athlete. J Exerc Sci Fitness 2006; 4: 1-14
  • 7 Bangsbo J, Nielsen J, Mohr M, Randers M, Krustrup B, Brito J, Nybo L, Krustrup P. Performance enhancements and muscular adaptations of a 16-week recreational football intervention for untrained women. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20: 24-30
  • 8 Borg G. Borg Scale. Eur J Appl Physiol 1985; 54: 343-349
  • 9 Capodaglio M. Comparison between the CR10 Borg’s scale and the VAS (visual analogue scale) during an arm-cranking exercise. J Occup Rehabil 2001; 11: 69-74
  • 10 Castagna C, D’Ottavio S, Abt G. Activity profile of young soccer players during actual match play. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17: 775-780
  • 11 Chen M, Fan X, Moe S. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 873-899
  • 12 Drust B, Reilly T, Cable N. Physiological responses to laboratory-based soccer-specific intermittent and continuous exercise. J Sports Sci 2000; 18: 885-892
  • 13 Duffield R, Dawson B, Pinnington C, Wong P. Accuracy and reliability of a Cosmed K4b2 portable gas analysis system. J Sci Med Sport 2004; 7: 11-22
  • 14 Edwards S. High performance training and racing. In: Edwards S. (ed.) The Heart Rate Monitor Book. Sacramento: Feet Fleet Press; 1993: 113-123
  • 15 Eniseler N. Heart rate and blood lactate concentrations as predictors of physiological load on elite soccer players during various soccer training activities. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 799-804
  • 16 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39: 175-191
  • 17 Foster C, Hector L, Schrager M, Green M, Snyder A. Effects of specific versus cross-training on running performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 70: 367-372
  • 18 Foster C, Florhaug J, Franklin J, Gottschall L, Hrovatin A, Parker S, Doleshal P, Dodge C. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15: 109-115
  • 19 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
  • 20 Impellizzeri F, Rampinini E, Coutts A, Sassi A, Marcora M. Use of RPE-based training load in soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1042-1047
  • 21 Gould D, Kelly D, Goldstone L, Gammon J. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. J Clin Nurs 2001; 10: 697-706
  • 22 Grant S, Aitchison T, Henderson E, Christie J, Zare S, McMurray J, Dargie H. A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise. Chest 1999; 116: 1208-1217
  • 23 Kentta G, Hassmen P. Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model. Sports Med 1998; 26: 1-16
  • 24 Little T, Williams A. Measures of exercise intensity during soccer training drills with professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 2: 367-371
  • 25 Manzi V, D’Ottavio S, Impellizzeri F, Chaouachi A, Chamari K, Castagna C. Profile of weekly training load in elite male professional basketball players. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 1399-1406
  • 26 McLaughlin J, King G, Howlei E, Basset D, Ainsworth B. Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system. Int J Sports Med 2001; 22: 280-284
  • 27 Mohr M, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. Match performance of high-standard soccer players with special reference to development of fatigue. J Sports Sci 2003; 21: 519-528
  • 28 Morgan W. Psychological components of effort sense. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26: 1071-1077
  • 29 Rowbottom D. Periodization of training. In: Kirkendall J. (ed.) Exercise and Sport Science. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000: 499-514
  • 30 Weiss M, Ebbeck V. Self-esteem and perceptions of competence in youth sports: Theory, research and enhancement. In: Bar-Or O. (ed.). The Child and Adolescent Athlete. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1996: 364-382