Download PDF
Endoscopy 2011; 43(11): 990-992
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291433
DDW Highlights
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

R. Laugier
Gastroenterology Department, La Timone Hospital, Marseilles, France
,
P. Grandval
Gastroenterology Department, La Timone Hospital, Marseilles, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 November 2011 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Introduction

Numerous new perspectives for diagnosis and treatment using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were demonstrated during the 2011 Digestive Disease Week (DDW; 7 – 10 May; Chicago, Illinois, USA). A large field of new developments emerged in the treatment of strictures and cysts as well as the description of new possibilities for cholangioscopy.

 

  • References

  • 1 Kubota K, Oshima A, Watanabe S et al. Needle-knife precut sphincterotomy with a small incision made possible by prior pancreatic stent placement reduces the complication rate in difficult biliary cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wilcox C, Trevino J, Phadnis M et al. Biliary sphincterotomy is not required for bile duct stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Khashab M, Kim K, Singh V et al. Comparative evaluation of risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis with placement of wing (Viaduct) and conventional plastic biliary stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 121
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Matsubara S, Isayama H. Efficacy of wire-guided cannulation of the bile duct in the treatment of acute cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Desai S, Naveed M, Jawinski A et al. Spiral enteroscopy versus laparoscopic-assisted endoscopy for completion of ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y et al. The impact of technical modification of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm on the occurrence of complications. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yoo KS, Kim S, Park C et al. Supplemental endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with minor endoscopic sphincterotomy in the management of difficult bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Harada R, Maguchi H, Osanai M et al. Large balloon dilation for the treatment of recurrent stones in patients with previous endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Teoh A, Cheung F, Chiu P et al. Combined sphincterotomy and balloon dilation (ESBD) versus standard sphincterotomy (ES) in retrieval of large bile duct stones. A randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 116-117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Aslan F, Alper E, Celik M et al. Biliary stenting decreases the size of difficult common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 189
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yamamoto N, Isayama H, Kawakubo K et al. The effect of endoscopic gallbladder drainage for management of acute cholecystitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Isayama H, Mukai T, Itoi T et al. The final report of WATCH study: comparison of covered Wallflex stent with covered Wallstent as historical control by Japanese multicenter study in cases with malignant distal biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Saleem A, Baron T, Cadman L et al. A meta-analysis comparing the patency of covered and uncovered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of distal malignant bile duct obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Brijbassie A, Stevens P, Sethi A et al. Multicenter trial evaluating the use of covered self-expanding metal stents in benign biliary strictures: time to revisit our therapeutic options?. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tarantino I, Traina M, Barresi M et al. Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents in biliary complications after liver transplantation: efficacy and safety in a large cohort of treated patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cerecedo-Rodriguez J, Phillips M, Figueroa-Barojas P et al. Self expandable metal stents for anastomotic stricture following liver transplant: should we go back to plastic stenting?. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 343
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Patel M, Trimble A, Galandauer I et al. The incidence and endoscopic management of recurrent post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) biliary strictures after initial successful endoscopic management. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hashimoto Y, Binmoeller K, Bhat Y et al. Sequential papilla-traversing, bilateral self-expandable metal stents for malignant hilar obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kawamoto H, Kato H, Noma Y et al. The effective chemotherapy to the biliary tract carcinoma can lengthen the patency time of multiple metallic stents deployed in malignant hilar biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Varadarajulu S, Christein J, Wilcox M. Endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in 200 consecutive patients: an assessment of outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Raijman I, Tarnasky P, Patel S et al. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and pancreatic necrosis using a removable expandable metal stent. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bakken J, Baron T. Pancreatic necrosectomy via percutaneous self-expandable metal stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Doi S, Yasuda I, Nakashima M et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation versus conventional saline irrigation for peroral video cholangioscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Raijman I, Nguyen D, Fishman D. Single center experience with Spyglass for pancreatic disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hoffman A, Rey J, Kramer K et al. Diagnostic yield of Spyglass directed biopsies compared to brush cytology in patients with long-lasting PSC. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 188-189
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Shah P, Rao S, Ginsberg G et al. Peroral cholangioscopy for the evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures: a single center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sethi A, Shah N, Pleskow D et al. Inerobserver agreement of single operator choledochoscopy imaging reading: what are we looking at?. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Liu Q, Bradford K, Jamil L et al. The novel biliary anchoring balloon significantly improves efficiency and depth of endoscope passage during peroral cholangioscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 111-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bossuyt P, Cuyle PJ, Moons V et al. Guide wire assisted and balloon-anchored direct peroral cholangioscopy with ultra slim gastroscopes in humans: proof of principal. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 192
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Widmer J, Pitea T, Harris M et al. Prospective evaluation of a protocol for direct peroral cholangioscopy using gastroscopes. An “as big as fits” approach to cholangioscope selection. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 112-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar