Introduction
Fishbones are the most commonly swallowed foreign body and are found mostly in the
tonsil, soft palate, tongue base, vallecula, posterior pharyngeal wall and upper esophagus.
In most cases, the fishbone could be safely removed in the emergency department. Few
cases showed a fishbone totally embedded in the mobile tongue presenting as an enlarged
mass that was mistaken for a neoplasm due to the lack of any history of oral trauma
(Wang Y et al. Oral Surgery 2008; 1: 220-222). These cases were diagnosed by incisional
biopsy instead of ultrasound examination which played an important role in the diagnosis
of foreign bodies in soft tissue. Here, we present one similar case that was diagnosed
by ultrasound before surgery.
Case report
A previously healthy 77-year-old male was admitted to the hospital because of an enlarged
tongue mass for five months. There was no pain, no dysphagia, and no neuromuscular
disturbance. Physical examination showed a mass with a diameter of 1.5 cm in the left
tongue base (Fig. [1]). The mass was firm, circumscribed, with an unclear boundary and no tenderness.
The tongue mucosa was intact and of normal color. An ear, nose, throat, and systemic
examination also did not reveal any abnormality.
Fig. 1 Photograph of the tongue. The photograph shows a mass with a 1.5cm diameter
on the ventral surface of the left tongue base of a 77-year-old male (arrow).
Abb. 1 Fotografie der Zunge. Die Fotografie zeigte eine Raumforderung mit 1,5cm Durchmesser
auf der ventralen Oberfläche der linken Zungenhälfte bei einem 77 Jahre alten Mann
(Pfeil).
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed prior to and after the administration
of gadolinium contrast agent (Magnevist, Schering, Germany) by a 1.5 T scanner (Signa
Excite, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). T 1-weighted imaging demonstrated a round
isointensive mass with an ill-defined margin in the left tongue base (Fig. [2a]). The mass signal was heterogeneous and slightly hyperintensive compared to the
tongue tissue in T 2WI (Fig. [2b]). It was heterogeneously enhanced with a relatively well-defined edge after venous
injection of contrast media (Fig. [2c]). The enhanced coronal T 1WI (Fig. [2d]) showed that the mass was enhanced with a pattern of target sign. To identify lymph
node metastases, ultrasonography was performed using a GE Voluson 730 Pro machine
(GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI, USA) with a 6-12 MHz endocavity transducer. It
showed a hypoechoic region with a size of approximately 1.7×1.0 cm with a hyperechoic
spot, rich blood supply, and non-spherical and irregular margin in the left tongue
base (Fig. [3a, b]). It suggested that the mass may be an inflammatory granuloma instead of a tumor.
Additionally, ultrasound also showed a linear foreign body-like hyperechoic area (1.2×0.07
cm) at the edge of the mass (Fig. [3c]). Interestingly, the patient denied having eaten fish within the last six months.
Incisional biopsy was performed under local anesthesia. A 1.2 cm (long) × 0.05 cm
(diameter) fishbone was then removed from the site identified by ultrasonography (Fig. [4]). A piece of tissue in the mass was also cut and sent for pathological study. The
final pathological report confirmed that the mass was inflammation rather than tumor.
Fig. 2 Magnetic resonance imaging of the tongue mass. An ill-defined mass in the left
tongue base was found in the sagittal T1-weighted images a and T2-weighted MR image
b, which was isointensive and hyperintensive compared to normal (arrow). A sagittal
gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image c showed an enhancing mass with a diameter
of 1.0 cm, and a coronal T1-weighted MR image d revealed the heterogeneously enhanced
mass with a pattern of target sign (arrow).
Abb. 2 MRT der Zungen Raumforderung. Eine schlecht abgegrenzte Raumforderung in der
linken Zungenhälfte konnte auf den sagittalen T1-gewichteten Bildern a und den T2-gewichteten
Bildern b dargestellt werden, die isointens bzw. hyperintens im Vergleich zum normalen
Gewebe war (Pfeil). Das sagittale Gadolinium verstärkte T1-gewichtete MRT-Bild c zeigte
eine kontrastaufnehmende Raumforderung mit einem Durchmesser von 1,0 cm und das koronare
T1-gewichtete MRT-Bild d zeigte eine heterogen kontrastierte Raumforderung mit einem
Schießscheibenmuster (Pfeil).
Fig. 3 Ultrasound images of the tongue mass. a The tongue mass showed a hypoechoic
region (1.7 × 1.0 cm) with a hyperechoic spot. b The tongue mass showed a rich blood
supply and irregular margin. c Ultrasound showed a linear foreign body-like hyperechoic
area (1.2 × 0.07 cm) at the edge of the mass.
Abb. 3 Ultraschall Bilder der Zungenraumforderung. a Die Raumforderung der Zunge konnte
als hypoechogene Region (1,7 × 1,0 cm) mit einem hyperechogenen Punkt dargestellt
werden. b Die Raumforderung zeigte eine starke Perfusion und war unregelmäßig berandet.
c Der Ultraschall zeigte eine lineare hyperechogene fremdkörperartige Läsion (1,2
× 0,7 cm) am Rande der Raumforderung.
Fig. 4 Photograph of the fishbone (1.2 × 0.05 cm) removed by surgery.
Abb. 4 Fotografie der Fischgräte (1,2x0,5 cm) nach chirurgischer Entfernung.
Discussion
There are many differential diagnoses for an enlarged tongue mass, including schwannoma,
germ cell tumor, irritative firm mass, lymphoma or inflammation lesion. When accompanied
by pain, swelling and a history of oral trauma, the tongue mass was often considered
to be a foreign body. More often, the history is non-contributory for tongue foreign
bodies, because the initial trauma has either been suppressed or simply forgotten
by the patient during the first visit. In this case, no oral traumatic event was reported
by the patient. Even the foreign body was showed by ultrasound. The patient denied
the traumatic experience of eating fish. In the absence of oral traumatic experience
or inflammatory symptoms, the tongue mass is often first diagnosed as a neoplasm (Lin
CJ et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 260: 277-279). In the case of suspicion
of a tongue neoplasm, MRI is a wonderful diagnostic tool. It provides valuable information
both within and around the tongue (Chong V. Cancer Imaging 2005; 5: S 49-S52). In
the present case, MRI imaging suggested that the tongue mass was a neoplasm, and did
not show any trace of foreign body. However, ultrasound imaging suggested that the
mass was inflammation and may have been caused by a foreign body
due to the hyperechoic point in the mass. Ultrasound scans from multiple angles showed
a linear foreign body-like hyperechoic area beside the mass. In the case of suspicion
of a foreign body in the soft tissue, the particles are better defined with respect
to form and size with ultrasound than with MRI (Oikarinen KS et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Surg 1993; 22: 119-124). It was reported that the swallowed foreign bodies migrated
through the wall of the gut and caused corresponding complications. Ultrasound examination
played a key role in determining patient treatment (Binek J et al. Ultraschall in
Med 2007; 28: 129-130; Weiler H et al. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27: 59-62). In this
case, 90 % of the fishbone had moved away from the mass as a result of daily tongue
movement. It may be difficult to remove the fishbone with surgery without ultrasonography.
Additionally, intraoral ultrasonography was an excellent method for delineating tumor
extent and tumor thickness in tongue carcinomas (Shintani S et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Surg 2001; 30: 139-143). It could measure the tumor thickness within 1 mm. However,
in most tumors with a thickness of less than 5.0 mm, CT and MRI could not detect a
sufficient density difference between the normal tissue and the tumor. There was a
significant correlation between measurements by intraoral ultrasonography and the
histological sections. Therefore, intraoralultrasonography may improve the differential
diagnosis of an enlarged tongue mass.
There have been rare reports of an enlarged mass due to a totally embedded foreign
body manifesting as a neoplasm in the tongue. However, the possibility of a foreign
body should be included in the differential diagnosis of a patient with an enlarged
tongue mass. Thus, ultrasonography will play an important role in the differential
diagnosis.
Statements
-
The possibility of a foreign body should be included in the differential diagnosis
of an enlarged tongue mass.
-
Intraoral ultrasonography may improve the differential diagnosis of foreign body granulomas
and neoplasms in the tongue.
Dr. Hongyan Chen, Shanghai, China
eMail: zhaozhen863@126.com
