Vaginal Reconstruction with the Abbè-McIndoe Technique: From Dermal Grafts to Autologous in Vitro Cultured Vaginal Tissue Transplant

ABSTRACT

Vaginal agenesis represents the most common anomaly of the lower female genital tract. Surgical treatments have gradually evolved from aggressive procedures to minimally invasive techniques. The Abbè-McIndoe procedure is one of the most frequent surgical procedures used. The original Abbè-McIndoe procedure consisted of the surgical creation of a vagina in between the bladder and the rectum and the successive lining with a dermal graft. In the last decades different authors have introduced several modifications, mostly changing the lining material. Amniotic membranes, inert materials, and oral mucosa have all been used to improve the short- and long-term results. Recently, we have reported the use of autologous in vitro grown vaginal tissue as lining material with highly promising results. In this review, we discuss the improvements achieved using this minimally invasive procedure and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the different materials.

KEYWORDS

Abbè-McIndoe - autologous tissue - Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome - vaginal agenesis - vaginoplasty

REFERENCES

• 1 Evans T N, Poland M L, Boving R L. Vaginal malformations.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;  141 (8) 910-920
• 2 Rock J A, Azziz R. Genital anomalies in childhood.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1987;  30 (3) 682-696
• 3 Ludwig K S. The Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster syndrome. An analysis of its morphology and embryology. Part II: Embryology.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1998;  262 (1–2) 27-42
• 4 Edmonds D K. Congenital malformations of the genital tract.  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2000;  27 (1) 49-62
• 5 American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology . ACOG committee opinion. Nonsurgical diagnosis and management of vaginal agenesis. Number 274, July 2002.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;  79 (2) 167-170
• 6 Quigley C A, De Bellis A, Marschke K B, el-Awady M K, Wilson E M, French F S. Androgen receptor defects: historical, clinical, and molecular perspectives.  Endocr Rev. 1995;  16 (3) 271-321
• 7 Schätz T, Huber J, Wenzl R. Creation of a neovagina according to Wharton-Sheares-George in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  83 (2) 437-441
• 8 Oakes M B, Eyvazzadeh A D, Quint E, Smith Y R. Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome—a review.  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2008;  21 (6) 305-310
• 9 Griffin J E, Edwards C, Madden J D, Harrod M J, Wilson J D. Congenital absence of the vagina. The Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome.  Ann Intern Med. 1976;  85 (2) 224-236
• 10 Duncan P A, Shapiro L R, Stangel J J, Klein R M, Addonizio J C. The MURCS association: Müllerian duct aplasia, renal aplasia, and cervicothoracic somite dysplasia.  J Pediatr. 1979;  95 (3) 399-402
• 11 Braun-Quentin C, Billes C, Böwing B, Kotzot D. MURCS association: case report and review.  J Med Genet. 1996;  33 (7) 618-620
• 12 Frank R T. The formation of an artificial vagina without operation.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1938;  135 1053-1055
• 13 Ingram J M. The bicycle seat stool in the treatment of vaginal agenesis and stenosis: a preliminary report.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;  140 (8) 867-873
• 14 Vecchietti G. Creation of an artificial vagina in Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.  [in Italian] Attual Ostet Ginecol. 1965;  11 (2) 131-147
• 15 Davydov S N, Zhvitiashvili O D. Formation of vagina (colpopoiesis) from peritoneum of Douglas pouch.  Acta Chir Plast. 1974;  16 (1) 35-41
• 16 Williams E A. Congenital absence of the vagina: a simple operation for its relief.  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1964;  71 511-512
• 17 Creatsas G, Deligeoroglou E, Makrakis E, Kontoravdis A, Papadimitriou L. Creation of a neovagina following Williams vaginoplasty and the Creatsas modification in 111 patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  76 (5) 1036-1040
• 18 Purushothaman V. Horse shoe flap vaginoplasty—a new technique of vaginal reconstruction with labia minora flaps for primary vaginal agenesis.  Br J Plast Surg. 2005;  58 (7) 934-939
• 19 McIndoe A H, Banniser J B. An operation for the cure of congenital absence of the vagina.  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1938;  45 490-494
• 20 Lin W C, Chang C Y, Shen Y Y, Tsai H D. Use of autologous buccal mucosa for vaginoplasty: a study of eight cases.  Hum Reprod. 2003;  18 (3) 604-607
• 21 Panici P B, Bellati F, Boni T, Francescangeli F, Frati L, Marchese C. Vaginoplasty using autologous in vitro cultured vaginal tissue in a patient with Mayer-von-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome.  Hum Reprod. 2007;  22 (7) 2025-2028
• 22 Abbè R. New method of creating a vagina in a case of congenital absence.  Med Rec. 1898;  54 836-838
• 23 Alessandrescu D, Peltecu G C, Buhimschi C S, Buhimschi I A. Neocolpopoiesis with split-thickness skin graft as a surgical treatment of vaginal agenesis: retrospective review of 201 cases.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  175 (1) 131-138
• 24 Bekerecioglu M, Balat O, Tercan M, Karakok M, Ugur M G, Isik D. Adaptation process of the skin graft to vaginal mucosa after McIndoe vaginoplasty.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;  277 (6) 551-554
• 25 Hallberg H, Holmström H. Vaginal construction with skin grafts and vacuum-assisted closure.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003;  37 (2) 97-101
• 26 Adamson C D, Naik B J, Lynch D J. The vacuum expandable condom mold: a simple vaginal stent for McIndoe-style vaginoplasty.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 (2) 664-666
• 27 Coskun A, Coban Y K, Vardar M A, Dalay A C. The use of a silicone-coated acrylic vaginal stent in McIndoe vaginoplasty and review of the literature concerning silicone-based vaginal stents: a case report.  BMC Surg. 2007;  7 13
• 28 Tercan M, Balat O, Bekerecioglu M, Atik B. The use of fibrin glue in the McIndoe technique of vaginoplasty.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 (2) 706-709
• 29 Fedele L, Frontino G, Motta F, Restelli E, Candiani M. Creation of a neovagina in Rokitansky patients with a pelvic kidney: comparison of long-term results of the modified Vecchietti and McIndoe techniques.  Fertil Steril. 2010;  93 (4) 1280-1285
• 30 Leduc B, van Campenhout J, Simard R. Congenital absence of the vagina. Observations on 25 cases.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968;  100 (4) 512-520
• 31 Garcia J, Jones Jr H W. The split thickness graft technic for vaginal agenesis.  Obstet Gynecol. 1977;  49 (3) 328-332
• 32 Ortiz-Monasterio F, Serrano A, Barrera G, Araico J. Congenital absence of the vagina. Long-term follow-up in 21 patients treated with skin grafts.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972;  49 (2) 165-170
• 33 Farber M, Mitchell G W. Surgery for congenital absence of the vagina.  Obstet Gynecol. 1978;  51 (3) 364-367
• 34 Wiser W L, Bates G W. Management of agenesis of the vagina.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984;  159 (2) 108-112
• 35 Buss J G, Lee R A. McIndoe procedure for vaginal agenesis: results and complications.  Mayo Clin Proc. 1989;  64 (7) 758-761
• 36 Rock J A, Reeves L A, Retto H, Baramki T A, Zacur H A, Jones Jr H W. Success following vaginal creation for Müllerian agenesis.  Fertil Steril. 1983;  39 (6) 809-813
• 37 Højsgaard A, Villadsen I. McIndoe procedure for congenital vaginal agenesis: complications and results.  Br J Plast Surg. 1995;  48 (2) 97-102
• 38 Counseller V S. Management of congenital absence of the vagina.  Tex Med. 1966;  62 (1) 63-67
• 39 Varner R E, Younger J B, Blackwell R E. Müllerian dysgenesis.  J Reprod Med. 1985;  30 (6) 443-450
• 40 Khanna S, Khanna N N. Congenital absence of vagina: an analysis of 18 cases corrected by the McIndoe operation using a condom mould.  Int Surg. 1982;  67 (4) 345-346
• 41 Harkins J L, Gysler M, Cowell C A. Anatomical amenorrhea: the problems of congenital vaginal agenesis and its surgical correction.  Pediatr Clin North Am. 1981;  28 (2) 345-354
• 42 Bryans F E. Management of congenital absence of the vagina.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;  139 (3) 281-284
• 43 Karjalainen O, Myllynen L, Kajanoja P, Tenhunen A, Purola E, Timonen S. Management of vaginal agenesis.  Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1980;  69 (1) 37-41
• 44 Salvatore C A, Lodovicci O. Vaginal agenesis: an analysis of ninety cases.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1978;  57 (1) 89-94
• 45 Kunz J, Held E, Schreiner W E. Experience with the split-thickness graft technique in congenital absence of the vagina.  Arch Gynecol. 1978;  226 (3) 227-232
• 46 Feroze R M, Dewhurst C J, Welply G. Vaginoplasty at the Chelsea hospital for women: a comparison of two techniques.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975;  82 (7) 536-540
• 47 Page E W, Owsley Jr J Q. Surgical correction of vaginal agenesis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969;  105 (5) 774-785
• 48 Cali R W, Pratt J H. Congenital absence of the vagina. Long-term results of vaginal reconstruction in 175 cases.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968;  100 (6) 752-763
• 49 Jackson I. The artificial vagina.  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1965;  72 336-341
• 50 Roberts C P, Haber M J, Rock J A. Vaginal creation for müllerian agenesis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  185 (6) 1349-1352 discussion 1352-1353
• 51 Ozek C, Gurler T, Alper M et al. Modified McIndoe procedure for vaginal agenesis.  Ann Plast Surg. 1999;  43 (4) 393-396
• 52 Tözüm R. Homotransplantation of the amniotic membrane for the treatment of congenital absence of the vagina.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1976;  14 (6) 553-556
• 53 Tancer M L, Katz M, Veridiano N P. Vaginal epithelialization with human amnion.  Obstet Gynecol. 1979;  54 (3) 345-349
• 54 Ashworth M F, Morton K E, Dewhurst J, Lilford R J, Bates R G. Vaginoplasty using amnion.  Obstet Gynecol. 1986;  67 (3) 443-446
• 55 Morton K E, Dewhurst C J. Human amnion in the treatment of vaginal malformations.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;  93 (1) 50-54
• 56 Mhaskar R. Amniotic membrane for cervical reconstruction.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;  90 (2) 123-127
• 57 Fotopoulou C, Sehouli J, Gehrmann N, Schoenborn I, Lichtenegger W. Functional and anatomic results of amnion vaginoplasty in young women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.  Fertil Steril. 2010;  94 (1) 317-323
• 58 Bürger R A, Müller S C, el-Damanhoury H, Tschakaloff A, Riedmiller H, Hohenfellner R. The buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction: a preliminary report.  J Urol. 1992;  147 (3) 662-664
• 59 Caldamone A A, Edstrom L E, Koyle M A, Rabinowitz R, Hulbert W C. Buccal mucosal grafts for urethral reconstruction.  Urology. 1998;  51 (5A, Suppl) 15-19
• 60 Dessanti A, Rigamonti W, Merulla V, Falchetti D, Caccia G. Autologous buccal mucosa graft for hypospadias repair: an initial report.  J Urol. 1992;  147 (4) 1081-1083 discussion 1083-1084
• 61 Yeşim Ozgenel G, Ozcan M. Neovaginal construction with buccal mucosal grafts.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  111 (7) 2250-2254
• 62 Zhao M, Li Q, Li P et al. Clinical application of autologous buccal micro-mucosa graft in vaginal reconstruction.  [in Chinese] Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;  23 (3) 309-312
• 63 Hatoko M, Kuwahara M, Tanaka A et al. Application of artificial dermis graft to correct a depression after tissue resection.  Ann Plast Surg. 2000;  45 (6) 633-640
• 64 Maruguchi T, Maruguchi Y, Suzuki S, Matsuda K, Toda K, Isshiki N. A new skin equivalent: keratinocytes proliferated and differentiated on collagen sponge containing fibroblasts.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;  93 (3) 537-544 discussion 545-546
• 65 Matsui R, Okura N, Osaki K, Konishi J, Ikegami K, Koide M. Histological evaluation of skin reconstruction using artificial dermis.  Biomaterials. 1996;  17 (10) 995-1000
• 66 Suzuki S, Shin-ya K, Kawai K, Nishimura Y. Application of artificial dermis prior to full-thickness skin grafting for resurfacing the nose.  Ann Plast Surg. 1999;  43 (4) 439-442
• 67 Bennett N T, Schultz G S. Growth factors and wound healing: biochemical properties of growth factors and their receptors.  Am J Surg. 1993;  165 (6) 728-737
• 68 Kawai K, Suzuki S, Tabata Y, Ikada Y, Nishimura Y. Accelerated tissue regeneration through incorporation of basic fibroblast growth factor-impregnated gelatin microspheres into artificial dermis.  Biomaterials. 2000;  21 (5) 489-499
• 69 Noguchi S, Nakatsuka M, Sugiyama Y, Chekir C, Kamada Y, Hiramatsu Y. Use of artificial dermis and recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor for creating a neovagina in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome.  Hum Reprod. 2004;  19 (7) 1629-1632
• 70 Sekiba K. The Obstetrics and Gynecology Adhesion Prevention Committee . Use of Interceed(TC7) absorbable adhesion barrier to reduce postoperative adhesion reformation in infertility and endometriosis surgery.  Obstet Gynecol. 1992;  79 (4) 518-522
• 71 Dineen P. The effect of oxidized regenerated cellulose on experimental intravascular infection.  Surgery. 1977;  82 (5) 576-579
• 72 Hazarika E Z. Oxidised regenerated cellulose: an effective emergency haemostatic in burns surgery.  Br J Plast Surg. 1985;  38 (3) 419-421
• 73 Uysal A C, Alagoz M S, Orbay H, Sensoz O. An alternative dressing material for the split-thickness skin graft donor site: oxidized regenerated cellulose.  Ann Plast Surg. 2006;  57 (1) 60-64
• 74 Jackson N D, Rosenblatt P L. Use of Interceed Absorbable Adhesion Barrier for vaginoplasty.  Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  84 (6) 1048-1050
• 75 Motoyama S, Laoag-Fernandez J B, Mochizuki S, Yamabe S, Maruo T. Vaginoplasty with Interceed absorbable adhesion barrier for complete squamous epithelialization in vaginal agenesis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  188 (5) 1260-1264
• 76 Sharma J B, Gupta N, Mittal S. Creation of neovagina using oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) as a surgical treatment of vaginal agenesis.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;  275 (4) 231-235
• 77 Doillon C J, Altchek A, Silver F H. Method of growing vaginal mucosal cells on a collagen sponge matrix. Results of preliminary studies.  J Reprod Med. 1990;  35 (3) 203-207
• 78 Sobel J D, Tchao R, Bozzola J, Levison M E, Kaye D. Human vaginal epithelial multilayer tissue culture.  In Vitro. 1979;  15 (12) 993-1000
• 79 Kussmaul A. Vom Mangel der Verkümmerung und Verdoppelung der Gebärmutter. Würzburg, Germany: Verlag der Stahelschen Buch- und Kunsthandlung; 1859
• 80 Rokitansky K F. Über die sogenannten Verdoppelungen des Uterus.  Med Jahrb Österr Staat. 1838;  26 39-77
• 81 Küster H. Uterus bipartitus solidus rudimentarius cum vagina solida.  Z Geburtshilfe Gynakol. 1910;  67 692-718
• 82 Hauser G A, Schreiner W E. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester syndrome. Rudimentary solid bipartite uterus with solid vagina.  [in German] Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1961;  91 381-384
• 83 Khen-Dunlop N, Lortat-Jacob S, Thibaud E, Clément-Ziza M, Lyonnet S, Nihoul-Fekete C. Rokitansky syndrome: clinical experience and results of sigmoid vaginoplasty in 23 young girls.  J Urol. 2007;  177 (3) 1107-1111
• 84 Imparato E, Alfei A, Aspesi G, Meus A L, Spinillo A. Long-term results of sigmoid vaginoplasty in a consecutive series of 62 patients.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;  18 (12) 1465-1469
• 85 Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G, Fontana E, Restelli E, Bruni V. The laparoscopic Vecchietti's modified technique in Rokitansky syndrome: anatomic, functional, and sexual long-term results.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;  198 (4) 377, e1-e6
• 86 Crouch N S, Liao L M, Creighton S M. Dilators or vibrators; breaking down the barriers. Paper presented at: Royal Society of Medicine Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Annual Conference 2003 London, UK;
• 87 Liao L M, Doyle J, Crouch N S, Creighton S M. Dilation as treatment for vaginal agenesis and hypoplasia: a pilot exploration of benefits and barriers as perceived by patients.  J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;  26 (2) 144-148
• 88 Smith J S, Backes D M, Hoots B E, Kurman R J, Pimenta J M. Human papillomavirus type-distribution in vulvar and vaginal cancers and their associated precursors.  Obstet Gynecol. 2009;  113 (4) 917-924
• 89 Bornstein J. The HPV vaccines—which to prefer?.  Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009;  64 (5) 345-350
• 90 Acién P, Acién M I, Quereda F, Santoyo T. Cervicovaginal agenesis: spontaneous gestation at term after previous reimplantation of the uterine corpus in a neovagina: case report.  Hum Reprod. 2008;  23 (3) 548-553
• 91 Beski S, Gorgy A, Venkat G, Craft I L, Edmonds K. Gestational surrogacy: a feasible option for patients with Rokitansky syndrome.  Hum Reprod. 2000;  15 (11) 2326-2328
• 92 Poote A E, van den Akker O B. British women's attitudes to surrogacy.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 (1) 139-145
• 93 Fageeh W, Raffa H, Jabbad H, Marzouki A. Transplantation of the human uterus.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;  76 (3) 245-251
• 94 Nair A, Stega J, Smith J R, Del Priore G. Uterus transplant: evidence and ethics.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;  1127 83-91