Int J Sports Med 2011; 32(3): 223-228
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1268502
Behavioural Sciences

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Contribution of Trunk Muscularity on Sprint Run

T. Kubo1 , Y. Hoshikawa2 , M. Muramatsu2 , T. Iida2 , S. Komori3 , K. Shibukawa4 , H. Kanehisa5
  • 1University of Tokyo, Life Sciences (Sports Sciences), Tokyo, Japan
  • 2Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Sports Photonics Laboratory, Iwata-city, Japan
  • 3Hamamatsu Pjotonics K.K., Central Research Laboratory, Hamamatsu, Japan
  • 4Yamaha Football Club Co. Ltd, Yamaha Football Club, Iwata, Japan
  • 5National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya, Sport performance, Kanoya-shi, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

accepted after revision November 01, 2010

Publication Date:
16 December 2010 (online)

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate how the trunk muscularity is related to sprint running performance. In 23 youth soccer players, the cross-sectional images at the mid level of each of L1–L2, L2–L3, L3–L4, L4–L5, and L5–S1 were obtained using magnetic resonance imaging to determine the cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of rectus abdominis, oblique, psoas major, quadratus lumborum and erector spinae muscles. The times taken to sprint over 20 m were measured, and the mean velocity of running was calculated for each of the 2 distances (V10 m and V20 m) and for the distance from 10 m to 20 m (V10–20 m). The CSA values of the 5 slice levels for all muscles except for the quadratus lumborum and those of the 3 slice levels (L1–L2, L2–L3 and L3–L4) for the quadratus lumborum were averaged and expressed relative to the two-third power of body mass (CSA/BM2/3). The CSA/BM2/3 values of the erector spinae and quadratus lumborum were selected as significant contributors to predict V10 m (R 2 =0.450), V20 m (R 2 =0.504) and V10–20 m (R 2 =0.420). The current results indicate that the muscularity of the erector spinae and quadratus lumborum contributes to achieving a high performance in sprint running over distances of less than 20 m.

References

  • 1 Alexander MJL. The relationship between muscle strength and sprint kinematics in elite sprinters.  Can J Sport Sci. 1989;  14 148-157
  • 2 Andersen E, Sward L, Thorstensson A. Trunk muscle strength in athletes.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;  20 587-593
  • 3 Andersson EA, Oddsson LIE, Grundstrom H, Nilsson J Thorstensson A. EMG activities of the quadratus lumborum and erector spinae muscles during flexion-relaxation and other motor tasks.  Clin Biomech. 1996;  11 392-400
  • 4 Andersson EA, Grundstrom H, Thorstensson A. Diverging intramuscular activity patterns in back and abdominal muscles during trunk rotation.  Spine. 2002;  27 E152-E160
  • 5 Asmussen E, Heebøll-Nielsen K. Dimensional analysis of physical performance and growth in boys.  J Appl Physiol. 1954;  7 593-603
  • 6 Åstrand P-O, Rodahl K. Textbook of Work Physiology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1970: 321-340
  • 7 Bamman MM, Newcomer BR, Larson-Meyer DE, Weinsier RL, Hunter GR. Evaluation of the strength-size relationship in vivo using various muscle size indices.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;  32 1307-1313
  • 8 Behm DG, Anderson KG. The role of instability with resistance training.  J Strength Cond Res. 2006;  20 716-722
  • 9 Bogduk N, Pearcy M, Hadfield G. Anatomy and biomechanics of psoas major.  Clin Biomech. 1992;  7 109-115
  • 10 Bret C, Rahmani A, Dufour AB, Messonnier L, Lacour JR. Leg strength and stiffness as ability factors in 100 m sprint training.  J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2002;  42 274-281
  • 11 Brožek J, Grande F, Anderson JT, Keys A. Densitmetric analysis of bodu composition: revision and some quantitative assumption.  Ann NY Acad Sci. 1963;  110 113-140
  • 12 Chumlea WC, Baumgartner RN, Roche AF. Specific resistivity used to estimate fat-free mass from segmental body measures of bioelectric impedance.  Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;  48 7-15
  • 13 Crews TR, Meadors WJ. Analysis of reaction time, speed, and body composition of college football players.  J Sports Med. 1978;  18 169-174
  • 14 Delecluse C. Influence of strength training on sprint running performance.  Sports Med. 1997;  24 147-156
  • 15 Dempster P, Aitkens S. A new air displacement method for the determination of human body composition.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;  27 1692-1697
  • 16 Dowson MN, Nevil ME, Lakomy HK, Hazeldine RJ. Modelling the relationship isokinetic muscle strength and sprint running performance.  J Sports Sci. 1998;  16 257-265
  • 17 Engstrom CM, Walker DG, Kippers V, Mehnert JH. Quadratus lumborum asymmetry and L4 pars injury in fast bowlers: a prospective study.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;  39 910-917
  • 18 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. International Journal of Sports Medicine – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research.  Int J Sports Med. 2009;  30 701-702
  • 19 Hides J, Stanton W, Freke M, Wilson S, McMahon S, Richardson C. MRI study of the size, symmetry and function of the trunk muscles among elite cricketers with and without low back pain.  Br J Sports Med. 2008;  42 509-513
  • 20 Hoshikawa Y, Muramatsu M, Iida T, Uchiyama A, Nakajima Y, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T. Influence of the psoas major and thigh muscularity on 100-m times in junior sprinters.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;  38 2138-2143
  • 21 Huang QM, Andersson E, Thorstensson A. Intramuscular myoelectric activity and selective coactivation of trunk muscles during lateral flexion with and without load.  Spine. 2001;  26 1465-1472
  • 22 Huang QM, Andersson EA, Thorstensson A. Specific phase related patterns of trunk muscle activation during lateral lifting and lowering.  Acta Physiol Scand. 2003;  178 41-50
  • 23 Hunter JP, Marshall RN, McNair P. Relationship between ground reaction force impulse and kinematics of sprint-running acceleration.  J Appl Biomech. 2005;  21 31-43
  • 24 Ishiguro N, Kanehisa H, Miyatani M, Masuo Y, Fukunaga T. A comparison of three bioelectrical impedance analyses for predicting lean body mass in a population with large difference in muscularity.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;  94 25-35
  • 25 Jaric S, Mirkov D, Markovic G. Normalizing physical performance tests for body size: a proposal for standardization.  J Strength Cond Res. 2005;  19 467-474
  • 26 Kibler WB, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function.  Sports Med. 2006;  36 189-198
  • 27 McGill S, Juker D, Kropf P. Quantitative intramuscular myoelectric activity of quadratus lumborum during a wide variety of tasks.  Clin Biomech. 1996;  11 170-172
  • 28 Mero A, Komi PV, Gregor RJ. Biomechanics of sprint running. A review.  Sports Med. 1992;  13 376-392
  • 29 Mohr M, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. Match performance of high-standard soccer player with special reference to development fatigue.  J Sports Sci. 2003;  21 519-528
  • 30 Nesser TW, Huxel KC, Tincher JL, Okada T. The relationship between core stability and performance in division I football players.  J Strength Cond Res. 2008;  22 1750-1754
  • 31 Newman MA, Tarpenning KM, Marino FE. Relationship between isokinetic knee strength, single-sprint performance, and repeated-sprint ability in football players.  J Strength Cond Res. 2004;  18 867-872
  • 32 Nilsson J, Thorstensson A, Halbertsma J. Changes in leg movements and muscle activity with speed of locomotion and mode of progression in humans.  Acta Physiol Scand. 1985;  123 457-475
  • 33 Reilly T, Williams AM, Nevill A, Franks A. A multidisciplinary approach to talent identification in soccer.  J Sports Sci. 2000;  18 695-702
  • 34 Silverstre R, West C, Maresh CM, Kraemer WJ. Body composition and physical performance in men's soccer: a study of a national collegiate athletic association division I team.  J Strength Cond Res. 2006;  20 177-183
  • 35 Thorstensson A, Carlson H, Zomlefer MR, Nilsson J. Lumber back muscle activity in relation to trunk movements during locomotion in man.  Acta Physiol Scand. 1982;  116 13-20
  • 36 Thorstensson A, Nillson J, Carlson H, Zomlefer MR. Trunk movements in human locomotion.  Acta Physiol Scand. 1984;  121 9-22
  • 37 Tumilty D. Physiological characteristics of elite soccer players.  Sports Med. 1993;  16 80-96
  • 38 Wickkiser JD, Kelly JM. The body composition of a college football team.  Med Sci Sports. 1975;  7 199-202

Correspondence

Dr. Hiroaki Kanehisa

National Institute of Fitness and

Sports in Kanoya

Sport performance

1 Shiramizu

Kanoya-shi, Kagoshima

8912393 Kanoya-shi

Japan

Phone: +81/0994/46 4932

Fax: +81/0994/46 5024

Email: hkane@nifs-k.ac.jp

    >