Semin Speech Lang 2010; 31(4): 227-235
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1265756
© Thieme Medical Publishers

What the Literature Tells Us about Listeners' Reactions to Stuttering: Implications for the Clinical Management of Stuttering

E. Charles Healey1
  • 1University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 November 2010 (online)

ABSTRACT

It is known that listeners harbor negative stereotypes toward people who stutter but there are a host of other findings in the literature that provide a broader perspective about how listeners react to stuttering. The focus of this article is a discussion of four areas of research related to listener reactions to stuttering: (1) how stuttering impacts listeners' reactions to mild, moderate, and severe stuttering; (2) how stuttering interferes with listener recall and comprehension of story information; (3) how children react to stuttering; and (4) how listeners react to strategies plus use in stuttering therapy programs. Studies associated with these four areas of research are summarized and discussed. Clinical implications that emerge from these studies are described to assist clinicians in the treatment of children and adults who stutter.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Manning W H. Clinical Decision Making in Fluency Disorders. Clifton Park, NY; Delmar Cengage Learning 2010
  • 2 Guntupalli V K, Everhart D E, Kalinowski J, Nanjundeswaran C, Saltuklaroglu T. Emotional and physiological responses of fluent listeners while watching the speech of adults who stutter.  Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007;  42 113-129
  • 3 Klassen T R. Perceptions of people who stutter: re-assessing the negative stereotype.  Percept Mot Skills. 2001;  92(2) 551-559
  • 4 MacKinnon S P, Hall S, Macintyre P D. Origins of the stuttering stereotype: stereotype formation through anchoring-adjustment.  J Fluency Disord. 2007;  32(4) 297-309
  • 5 Susca M, Healey E C. Perceptions of simulated stuttering and fluency.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;  44(1) 61-72
  • 6 Panico J, Healey E C, Brouwer K, Susca M. Listener perceptions of stuttering across two presentation modes: a quantitative and qualitative approach.  J Fluency Disord. 2005;  30(1) 65-85
  • 7 Susca M, Healey E C. Listener perceptions along a fluency—disfluency continuum: a phenomenological analysis.  J Fluency Disord. 2002;  27(2) 135-160 quiz 160-161
  • 8 Sander E K. Comments on investigating listener reaction to speech disfluency.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1965;  30 159-165
  • 9 Hulit L M. Effects of nonfluencies on comprehension.  Percept Mot Skills. 1976;  42 1119-1122
  • 10 Cyprus S, Hezel R T, Rossi D, Adams M R. Effects of simulated stuttering on listener recall.  J Fluency Disord. 1984;  17 191-197
  • 11 Panico J, Healey E C. Influence of text type, topic familiarity, and stuttering frequency on listener recall, comprehension, and mental effort.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;  52(2) 534-546
  • 12 Guitar B. Stuttering: An Integrated Approach to Its Nature and Treatment. 3rd ed. Burlington, VT; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2006
  • 13 Healey E C, Scott-Trautman L, Panico J. A model for manipulating linguistic complexity in stuttering therapy. International Stuttering Awareness Day Online Conference 2001 Mankato State University, MN;
  • 14 Giolas T G, Williams D E. Children's reactions to nonfluencies in adult speech.  J Speech Hear Res. 1958;  1(1) 86-93
  • 15 Onslow M, Packman A, Harrison E. The Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention: A Clinician's Guide. Austin, TX; Pro-Ed 2003
  • 16 Griffin M, Leahy M M. Young children's (3–5 year old) perceptions of a dysfluent speaker. In Au-Yeung J, Leahy MM Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Fluency Disorders. Dublin, Ireland; The International Fluency Association 2007: 217-222
  • 17 Culatta R, Sloan A. The acquisition of the label “stuttering” by primary-level school children.  J Fluency Disord. 1977;  2 29-34
  • 18 Franck A L, Jackson R A, Pimentel J T, Greenwood G S. School-age children's perceptions of a person who stutters.  J Fluency Disord. 2003;  28(1) 1-15
  • 19 Hartford E, Leahy M M. The perceptions of primary school children of a person who stutters. In Au-Yeung J, Leahy MM Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Fluency Disorders. Dublin, Ireland; The International Fluency Association 2007: 223-229
  • 20 Panico J, Sudholt J. Elementary school students' perceptions of stuttering. Poster presented at: the American Speech Language Hearing Association Convention New Orleans, LA; November 19–21, 2009
  • 21 Evans D, Healey E C, Kawai N, Rowland S. Middle school students' perceptions of a peer who stutters.  J Fluency Disord. 2008;  33(3) 203-219
  • 22 Murphy W P, Yaruss J S, Quesal R W. Enhancing treatment for school-age children who stutter II. Reducing bullying through role-playing and self-disclosure.  J Fluency Disord. 2007;  32(2) 139-162
  • 23 Manning W H, Burlison A E, Thaxton D. Listener response to stuttering modification techniques.  J Fluency Disord. 1999;  24 267-280
  • 24 Breitenfeld D H, Lorenz D R. Successful Stuttering Management Program for Adolescent and Adult Stutterers. Cheney, WA; School of Health Sciences, Eastern Washington University 1989
  • 25 Collins C R, Blood G W. Acknowledgment and severity of stuttering as factors influencing nonstutterers' perceptions of stutterers.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1990;  55(1) 75-81
  • 26 Healey E C, Gabel R M, Daniels D E, Kawai N. The effects of self-disclosure and non self-disclosure of stuttering on listeners' perceptions of a person who stutters.  J Fluency Disord. 2007;  32(1) 51-69
  • 27 Logan K J, Roberts R R, Pretto A P, Morey M J. Speaking slowly: effects of four self-guided training approaches on adults' speech rate and naturalness.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2002;  11 163-174

E. Charles HealeyPh.D. 

Professor, University of Nebraska

204 Barkley Memorial Center, Lincoln, NE 68583-0738

Email: ehealey1@unl.edu

    >