Background and study aims: Distinguishing pancreatic adenocarcinoma from other pancreatic masses remains challenging with current imaging techniques. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a new procedure, imaging the microcirculation pattern of the pancreas by contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) with a new Olympus prototype echo endoscope.
Patients and methods: 35 patients presenting with solid pancreatic lesions were prospectively enrolled. All patients had conventional B mode and power Doppler EUS. After an intravenous bolus injection of 2.4 ml of a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent (SonoVue) CEH-EUS was then performed with a new Olympus prototype echo endoscope (xGF-UCT 180). The microvascular pattern was compared with the final diagnosis based on the pathological examination of specimens from surgery or EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or on follow-up for at least 12 months.
Results: The final diagnoses were: 18 adenocarcinomas, 9 neuroendocrine tumors, 7 chronic pancreatitis, and 1 stromal tumor. Power Doppler failed to display microcirculation, whereas harmonic imaging demonstrated it in all cases. Out of 18 lesions with a hypointense signal on CEH-EUS, 16 were adenocarcinomas. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of hypointensity for diagnosing pancreatic adenocarcinoma were 89 %, 88 %, 88 %, 89 %, and 88.5 %, compared with corresponding values of 72 %, 100 %, 77 %, 100 %, and 86 % for EUS-FNA. Of five adenocarcinomas with false-negative results at EUS-FNA, four had a hypointense echo signal at CEH-EUS.
Conclusions: CEH-EUS with the new Olympus prototype device successfully visualizes the microvascular pattern in pancreatic solid lesions, and may be useful for distinguishing adenocarcinomas from other pancreatic masses.
References
1
Vanbeckevoort D.
Solid pancreatic masss: benign or malignant.
JBR-BTR.
2007;
90
487-489
2
Carter D C.
Cancer of the head of pancreas or chronic pancreatitis? A diagnostic dilemma.
Surgery.
1992;
111
602-603
3
Taylor B.
Carcinoma of the head of the pancreas versus chronic pancreatitis: diagnostic dilemma with significant consequences.
World J Surg.
2003;
27
1249-1257
4
Wharton S M, Rahman Z, Johnson C D.
Missed curable carcinoma of the pancreas presenting as chronic pancreatitis.
Postgrad Med J.
1997;
73
577-579
5
Hartmann D, Schilling D, Bassler B. et al .
ERCP and MRCP in the differentiation of pancreatic tumors.
Dig Dis.
2004;
22
18-25
6
Boll D T, Merkle E M.
Differentiating a chronic hyperplastic mass from pancreatic cancer: a challenge remaining in multidetector CT of the pancreas.
Eur Radiol.
2003;
13 Suppl 5
M42-M49
7
DeBacker A I, Mortele K J, Ros R R. et al .
Chronic pancreatitis: diagnostic role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
JBR-BTR.
2002;
85
304-310
8
Schima W.
MRI of the pancreas: tumours and tumour-simulating processes.
Cancer Imag.
2006;
6
199-203
9
Brand B, Pfaff T, Binmoeller K F. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound for differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic lesions, confirmed by surgery.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
2000;
35
1221-1228
10
Bhutani M S, Hawes R H, Baron P L. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of malignant pancreatic lesions.
Endoscopy.
1997;
29
854-858
11
Chang K, Nguyen P, Erickson R. et al .
The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1997;
45
387-394
12
Giovannini M.
Guided puncture-biopsy under endosonography.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol.
1997;
21
355-357
13
Gress F G, Hawes R H, Savides T J. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy using linear array and radial scanning endosonography.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1997;
45
243-250
14
Wiersema M J, Vilmann P, Giovannini M. et al .
Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
112
1087-1095
15
Williams D B, Sahai A V, Aabakken L. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience.
Gut.
1999;
44
720-726
16
Fritscher-Ravens A, Schirrow L, Atay Z. et al .
Endosonographically controlled fine needle aspiration cytology – indications and results in routine diagnosis.
Z Gastroenterol.
1999;
37
343-351
17
Voss M, Hammel P, Molas G. et al .
Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.
Gut.
2000;
46
244-249
18
Gress F, Gottlieb K, Sherman S. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer.
Ann Intern Med.
2001;
134
459-464
19
Harewood G C, Wiersema M J.
Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2002;
97
1386-1391
20
Eloubeidi M A, Chen V K, Eltoum I A. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2003;
98
2663-2668
21
Raut C P, Grau A M, Staerkel G A. et al .
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer.
J Gastrointest Surg.
2003;
1
118-126
22
Wilson J L, Kalade A, Prasad S. et al .
Diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.
Intern Med J.
2009;
39
32-37
23
Dietrich C F.
Characterisation of focal liver lesions with contrast enhanced ultrasonography.
Eur J Radiol.
2004;
51S
S9-S17
24
Bachmann M, Bang N.
Contrast enhanced ultrasound in liver imaging.
Eur J Radiol.
2004;
51S
S3-S8
25
Dietrich C F, Ignee A, Trojan J. et al .
Improved characterisation of histologically proven liver tumours by contrast enhanced ultrasonography during the portal venous and specific late phase of SHU 508A.
Gut.
2004;
53
401-405
26
Rettenbacher T.
Focal liver lesions: role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Eur J Radiol.
2007;
64
173-182
27
Morin S, Lim A, Cobbold J. et al .
Use of second generation contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of focal liver lesions.
World J Gastroenterol.
2007;
13
5963-5970
28
De Jong N, Frinking P, Bouakaz A. et al .
Detection procedures of ultrasound contrast agents.
Ultrasonics.
2000;
38
87-92
29
Hirooka Y, Goto H, Ito A. et al .
Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in pancreatic diseases: A preliminary study.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1998;
93
632-635
30
Dietrich C F, Ignee A, Braden B. et al .
Improved differentiation of pancreatic tumors using contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2008;
6
590-597
31
Becker D, Strobel D, Bernatik T. et al .
Echo-enhanced and color- and power- Doppler EUS for the discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
53
784-789
32
Hocke M, Schulze E, Gottschalk . et al .
Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.
World J Gastroenterol.
2006;
12
246-250
33
Hocke M, Ignee A, Topalidis T. et al .
Contrast-enhanced endosonographic Doppler spectrum analysis is helpful in discrimination between focal chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.
Pancreas.
2007;
35
286-288
34
Hocke M, Schmidt C, Zimmer B. et al .
Contrast enhanced endosonography for improving differential diagnosis between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr.
2008;
133
1888-1892
35
Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Suetomi Y. et al .
Utility of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosis of small pancreatic carcinomas.
Ultrasound Med Biol.
2008;
34
525-532
36
Kitano M, Sakamoto H, Matsui U. et al .
A novel perfusion imaging technique of the pancreas: contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
141-149
37
Hosoki T.
Dynamic CT on pancreatic tumors.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1983;
140
959-965
38
Freeny P C, Marks W M, Ryan J A. et al .
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT.
Radiology.
1988;
166
125-133
39
Johnson P T, Outwater E K.
Pancreatic carcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis: dynamic MR imaging.
Radiology.
1999;
212
213-218
40
Linder S, Blåsjö M, Rosen A. et al .
Pattern of distribution and prognostic value of angiogenesis in pancreatic duct carcinoma.
Pancreas.
2001;
22
240-247
41
Gritzmann N, Macheiner P, Hollerweger A. et al .
CT in the differentiation of pancreatic neoplasms – progress report.
Dig Dis.
2004;
22
6-17
42
Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T. et al .
Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) – update 2008.
Ultraschall Med.
2008;
29
28-44
43
Nagase M, Furuse J, Ishii H. et al .
Evaluation of contrast enhancement patterns in pancreatic tumors by coded harmonic sonographic imaging with a microbubble contrast agent.
J Ultrasound Med.
2003;
22
789-795
44
Hohl C, Schmidt T, Haage P. et al .
Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging compared with conventional B-mode ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic lesions.
Eur Radiol.
2004;
14
1109-1117
45
Kitano M, Kudo M, Maekawa K. et al .
Dynamic imaging of pancreatic diseases by contrast enhanced coded phase inversion harmonic ultrasonography.
Gut.
2004;
53
854-859
46
D’Onofrio M, Martone E, Malagò R. et al .
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the pancreas.
J Pancreas.
2007;
8 Suppl
71-76
47
Kitano M, Sakamoto H, Maekawa K. et al .
Preliminary study of contrast-enhanced harmonic endosonography with second-generation contrast agents.
J Med Ultrasonics.
2008;
35
11-18
48
Strobel D, Hahn E G, Becker D.
Harmonic imaging for improving diagnosis of liver tumors – preliminary report.
Z Gastroenterol.
2001;
39
287-289
49
Strobel D, Raeker S, Martus P. et al .
Phase inversion harmonic imaging versus contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography for the characterization of focal liver lesions.
Int J Colorect Dis.
2003;
18
63-72
50
Giovannini M, Hookey L C, Bories E. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: the first step towards virtual biopsy? Preliminary results in 49 patients.
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
344-348
51
Janssen J, Schlörer E, Greiner L.
EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
65
971-978
52
Hirche T O, Ignee A, Barreiros A P. et al .
Indications and limitations of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of local pancreatic lesions.
Endoscopy.
2008;
49
910-917
53
Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F. et al .
Neural network analysis of dynamic sequences of EUS elastography used for the differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
68
1086-1094
54
Bournet B, Souque A, Senesse P. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy coupled with KRAS mutation assay to distinguish pancreatic cancer from pseudotumoral chronic pancreatitis.
Endoscopy.
2009;
41
552-557
55
Bhutani M S.
Digital analysis of EUS images: “promising” method, but is it ready for “prime time”?.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
868-70
56
Esteban J M, Gil J.
Therapeutic effect of chemoembolization therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging.
Acad Radiol.
2002;
Suppl 2
S382-S383
57
Korpanty G, Carbon J G, Grayburn P. et al .
Monitoring response to anticancer therapy by targeting microbubbles to tumor vasculature.
Clin Cancer Res.
2007;
13
323-330
58
Hernot S, Klibanov A L.
Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev.
2008;
60
1153-1166
B. Napoleon MD
Department of Gastroenterology Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz
55 avenue Jean Mermoz 69008 Lyon France
Fax: +33-478-742655
Email: dr.napoleon@wanadoo.fr