Literatur
-
1
Ng Y L, Mann V, Rahbaran S et al.
Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature – part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success.
Int Endod J.
2007;
40
921-939
-
2
Iqbal M K, Kim S.
For teeth requiring endodontic treatment, what are the differences in outcomes of restored endodontically treated teeth compared to implant-supported restorations?.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
2007;
22 Suppl
96-116
-
3
Torabinejad M et al.
Outcomes of root canal treatment and restoration, implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and extraction without replacement: a systematic review.
J Prosthet Dent.
2007;
98
285-311
-
4
Zitzmann N U, Weiger R.
Wurzelkanalbehandlung versus Implantation.
Zahnmedizin up2date.
2009;
(4)
363-385
-
5
Sedgley C M, Messer H H.
Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle?.
J Endod.
1992;
18
332-335
-
6
Papa J, Cain C, Messer H H.
Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth.
Endod Dent Traumatol.
1994;
10
91-93
-
7
Reeh E S, Douglas W H, Messer H H.
Stiffness of endodontically treated teeth related to restoration technique.
J Dent Res.
1989;
68
540-544
-
8
Panitvisai P, Messer H H.
Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures.
J Endod.
1995;
21
57-61
-
9
Lang H, Korkmaz Y, Schneider K et al.
Impact of endodontic treatments on the rigidity of the root.
J Dent Res.
2006;
85
364-368
-
10
Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange K P et al.
Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores – a review.
Quintessence Int.
2005;
36
737-746
-
11
Trabert K C, Caput A A, Abou-Rass M.
Tooth fracture – a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments.
J Endod.
1978;
4
341-345
-
12
Trope M, Maltz D O, Tronstad L.
Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth.
Endod Dent Traumatol.
1985;
1
108-111
-
13
Morgano S M, Brackett S E.
Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs.
J Prosthet Dent.
1999;
82
643-657
-
14
Fernandes A S, Dessai G S.
Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review.
Int J Prosthodont.
2001;
14
355-363
-
15
Naumann M, Lange K-P.
Ansichten und Techniken zur Rekonstruktion endodontisch behandelter Zähne – eine Umfrage unter Zahnärzten im Bundesgebiet.
Deutsch Zahnärztl Z.
2003;
58
280-285
-
16
Sorensen J A, Martinoff J T.
Clinically significant factors in dowel design.
J Prosthet Dent.
1984;
52
28-35
-
17
Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O et al.
Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: a randomized clinical trial.
Int J Prosthodont.
2007;
20
173-178
-
18 Fokkinga W A. Post it? Reconstruction of the endodontically treated tooth. Thesis. Radboud University Nijmegen. – with summary in dutch 2007
-
19
Fokkinga W A, Kreulen C M, Vallittu P K et al.
A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems.
Int J Prosthodont.
2004;
17
476-482
-
20
Morgano S M, Milot P.
Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores.
J Prosthet Dent.
1993;
70
11-16
-
21
Vichi A, Fraioli A, Davidson C L et al.
Influence of thickness on color in multi-layering technique.
Dent Mater.
2007;
23
1584-1589
-
22
Chandler N P, Qualtrough A J, Purton D G.
Comparison of two methods for the removal of root canal posts.
Quintessence Int.
2003;
34
534-536
-
23
Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G et al.
Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post.
Biomaterials.
2002;
23
2667-2682
-
24
Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F et al.
Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts.
Am J Dent.
2000;
13
9B-13B
-
25
Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M et al.
A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts.
J Prosthet Dent.
1998;
80
151-157
-
26
Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F.
Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores.
Am J Dent.
2000;
13
15B-18B
-
27
Mannocci F, Qualtrough A J, Worthington H V et al.
Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results.
Oper Dent.
2005;
30
9-15
-
28
Grandini S, Goracci C, Tay F R et al.
Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth.
Int J Prosthodont.
2005;
18
399-404
-
29
Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R.
Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts.
Int J Prosthodont.
2003;
16
39-44
-
30
Glazer B.
Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts – a prospective study.
J Can Dent Assoc.
2000;
66
613-618
-
31
Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M et al.
Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration.
J Prosthet Dent.
2002;
88
297-301
-
32
Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C et al.
Clinical behavior of translucent-fiber posts: a 2-year prospective study.
Int J Prosthodont.
2003;
16
593-596
-
33
Naumann M, Kiessling S, Seemann R.
Treatment concepts for restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A nationwide survey of dentists in Germany.
J Prosthet Dent.
2006;
96
332-338
-
34
Assif D, Gorfil C.
Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth.
J Prosthet Dent.
1994;
71
565-567
-
35
Guzy G E, Nicholls J I.
In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement.
J Prosthet Dent.
1979;
42
39-44
-
36
Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub J R.
Einfluss des endodontischen Aufbaus auf die Frakturfestigkeit überkronter Frontzähne.
Dtsch Zahnärztl Z.
1999;
54
637-640
-
37
Baratieri L N, De Andrada M A, Arcari G M et al.
Influence of post placement in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors veneered with direct composite.
J Prosthet Dent.
2000;
84
180-184
-
38
McDonald A V, King P A, Setchell D J.
In vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root-treated teeth.
Int Endod J.
1990;
23
304-312
-
39
Sorensen J A, Engelman M J.
Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
J Prosthet Dent.
1990;
63
529-536
-
40
Stankiewicz N R, Wilson P R.
The ferrule effect: a literature review.
Int Endod J.
2002;
35
575-581
-
41
Saupe W A, Gluskin A H, Radke jr. R A.
A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots.
Quintessence Int.
1996;
27
483-491
-
42
Caputo A A, Standlee J P.
Pins and posts-why, when and how.
Dent Clin North Am.
1976;
20
299-311
-
43
Tjan A H, Whang S B.
Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls.
J Prosthet Dent.
1985;
53
496-500
-
44
Yoldas O, Akova T, Uysal H.
An experimental analysis of stresses in simulated flared root canals subjected to various post-core applications.
J Oral Rehabil.
2005;
32
427-432
-
45
Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Lange K-P.
Vorschlag zur Standardisierung von In-vitro Belastbarkeitsuntersuchungen an endodontisch behandelten Zähnen.
Dtsch Zahnärztl Z.
2002;
57
554-557
-
46
Pilo R, Tamse A.
Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills.
J Prosthet Dent.
2000;
83
617-623
-
47
Attin T.
Der Einfluß verstärkender Wurzelstifte auf die Frakturanfälligkeit endodontisch versorgter Zähne.
Dtsch Zahnärztl Z.
1994;
49
586-589
-
48
Steele A, Johnson B R.
In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars.
J Endod.
1999;
25
6-8
-
49
Ausiello P, De Gee A J, Rengo S et al.
Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored.
Am J Dent.
1997;
10
237-241
-
50
Strub J R, Pontius O, Koutayas S.
Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth.
J Oral Rehabil.
2001;
28
120-124
-
51
Testori T, Badinio M, Castagnola M.
Vertical root fractures in endodonically treated teeth: a clinical survey of 36 cases.
J Endod.
1993;
19
87-91
-
52
Sorensen J A, Martinoff J T.
Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth.
J Prosthet Dent.
1984;
51
780-784
-
53
Foley J, Saunders E, Saunders W P.
Strength of core build-up materials in endodontically treated teeth restored by the post and core technique.
Am J Dent.
1997;
10
166-172
-
54
Burke F J, Shaglouf A G, Combe E C et al.
Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
Oper Dent.
2000;
25
388-394
-
55
Bolhuis H P B, De Gee A J, Feilzer A J et al.
Fracture strength of different core build-up designs.
Am J Dent.
2001;
14
286-290
-
56
Yoldas O, Oztunc H, Tinaz C et al.
Perforation risks associated with the use of Masserann endodontic kit drills in mandibular molars.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.
2004;
97
513-517
-
57
Torbjorner A, Fransson B.
A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth.
Int J Prosthodont.
2004;
17
369-376
-
58
Sorensen J, Ahn S, Berge H et al.
Selection criteria for post and core materials in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth.
Proceedings of Conference on Scientific Criteria for Selecting Materials and Techniques in Clinical Dentistry.
2001;
15
67-84
-
59
King P A, Setchell D J.
An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth.
J Oral Rehabil.
1990;
17
599-609
-
60
Assif D, Oren E, Marshak B L, Aviv I.
Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques.
J Prosthet Dent.
1989;
61
535-543
-
61
Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T.
Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts.
J Dent.
1999;
27
275-278
-
62
Bae J M et al.
The flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite with light-polymerized polymer matrix.
Int J Prosthodont.
2001;
14
33-39
-
63
Cormier C J, Burns D R, Moon P.
In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration.
J Prosthodont.
2001;
10
26-36
-
64
Newman M P, Yaman P, Dennison J et al.
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.
J Prosthet Dent.
2003;
89
360-367
-
65
Bateman G, Ricketts D N, Saunders W P.
Fibre-based post systems: a review.
Br Dent J.
2003;
195
43-48
-
66
Isidor F, Odman P, Brondum K.
Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts.
Int J Prosthodont.
1996;
9
131-136
-
67
Bolhuis P, de Gee A, Feilzer A.
Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars.
Quintessence Int.
2004;
35
657-667
-
68
Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A.
Bonding of resin cements to post materials: influence of surface energy characteristics.
J Adhes Dent.
2005;
7
231-234
-
69
de Rijk W G.
Removal of fiber posts from endodontically treated teeth.
Am J Dent.
2000;
13
19B-21B
-
70
Gesi A, Magnolfi S, Goracci C, Ferrari M.
Comparison of two techniques for removing fiber posts.
J Endod.
2003;
29
580-582
-
71
Lindemann M, Yaman P, Dennison J B et al.
Comparison of the efficiency and effectiveness of various techniques for removal of fiber posts.
J Endod.
2005;
31
520-522
-
72
Castrisos T V, Palamara J E, Abbott P V.
Measurement of strain on tooth roots during post removal with the Eggler post remover.
Int Endod J.
2002;
35
337-344
-
73
Castrisos T, Abbott P V.
A survey of methods used for post removal in specialist endodontic practice.
Int Endod J.
2002;
35
172-180
-
74
Nissan J, Dmitry Y, Assif D.
The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
J Prosthet Dent.
2001;
86
304-308
-
75
Abramovitz L, Lev R, Fuss Z, Metzger Z.
The unpredictability of seal after post space preparation: a fluid transport study.
J Endod.
2001;
27
292-295
-
76
Wu M-K, Pehlivan Y et al.
Microleakage along apical root fillings and cemented posts.
J Prosthet Dent.
1998;
79
264-269
-
77
Goldman M, DeVitre R, White R et al.
An SEM study of posts cemented with an unfilled resin.
J Dent Res.
1984;
63
1003-1005
-
78
Reid L C, Kazemi R B, Meiers J C.
Effect of fatigue testing on core integrity and post microleakage of teeth restored with different post systems.
J Endod.
2003;
29
125-131
-
79
Schwartz R S, Robbins J W.
Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review.
J Endod.
2004;
30
289-301
-
80
Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A.
Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth.
J Prosthet Dent.
2005;
94
321-329
-
81
Li L L et al.
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with different cements in combination with titanium alloy posts.
Chin Med J (Engl).
2006;
119
305-311
-
82
Mendoza D B, Eakle W S, Kahl E A et al.
Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post.
J Prosthet Dent.
1997;
78
10-14
-
83
Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco M C, Mjor I A.
Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate.
Am J Dent.
2000;
13
255-260
-
84
Bitter K, Paris S, Martus P, Schartner R, Kielbassa A M.
A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope investigation of different dental adhesives bonded to root canal dentine.
Int Endod J.
2004;
37
840-848
-
85
Serafino C, Gallina G, Cumbo E et al.
Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.
2004;
97
381-387
-
86
Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F et al.
SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts.
J Adhes Dent.
2005;
7
235-240
-
87
Bolhuis P, de Gee A, Feilzer A.
The influence of fatigue loading on the quality of the cement layer and retention strength of carbon fiber post-resin composite core restorations.
Oper Dent.
2005;
30
220-227
-
88
Drummond J L, Toepke T R, King T J.
Thermal and cyclic loading of endodontic posts.
Eur J Oral Sci.
1999;
107
220-224
-
89
Sano H, Kanemura N, Burrow M F et al.
Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: students vs. dentists.
Dent Mater J.
1998;
17
51-58
-
90
Van Meerbeek B et al.
Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives.
Dent Mater J.
2005;
24
1-13
-
91
Chersoni S et al.
In vivo fluid movement through dentin adhesives in endodontically treated teeth.
J Dent Res.
2005;
84
223-227
-
92
Lloyd P M, Palik J F.
The philosophies of dowel diameter preparation: a literature review.
J Prosthet Dent.
1993;
69
32-36
-
93
Schwartz N L, Whitsett L D, Berry T G et al.
Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability.
J Am Dent Assoc.
1970;
81
1395-1401
-
94
Aquilino S A, Caplan D J.
Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth.
J Prosthet Dent.
2002;
87
256-263
-
95
Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U et al.
Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores.
J Prosthet Dent.
1989;
61
10-15
-
96
Iqbal M K, Johansson A A, Akeel R F et al.
A retrospective analysis of factors associated with the periapical status of restored, endodontically treated teeth.
Int J Prosthodont.
2003;
16
31-38
-
97
Loney R W, Moulding M B, Ritsco R G.
The effect of load angulation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and cores and crowns.
Int J Prosthodont.
1995;
8
247-251
-
98
Hatzikyriakos A H, Reisis G I, Tsingos N.
A 3-year postoperative clinical evaluation of posts and cores beneath existing crowns.
J Prosthet Dent.
1992;
67
454-458
-
99
Decock V, De Nayer K, De Boever J A, Dent M.
18-year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed restorations.
Int J Prosthodont.
1996;
9
331-340
-
100
Caplan D J, Kolker J, Rivera E M et al.
Relationship between number of proximal contacts and survival of root canal treated teeth.
Int Endod J.
2002;
35
193-199
-
101
Eckerbom M, Magnusson T, Martinsson T.
Prevalence of apical periodontitis, crowned teeth and teeth with posts in a Swedish population.
Endod Dent Traumatol.
1991;
7
214-220
-
102
Naumann M, Rosentritt M, Preuss A et al.
The effect of alveolar bone loss on the load capability of restored endodontically treated teeth: A comparative in vitro study.
J Dent.
2006;
34
790-795
-
103
Lynch C D, Burke F M, Ni Riordain R et al.
The influence of coronal restoration type on the survival of endodontically treated teeth.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent.
2004;
12
171-176
-
104
Ferrari M, Mason P N, Goracci C et al.
Collagen degradation in endodontically treated teeth after clinical function.
J Dent Res.
2004;
83
414-419
-
105
Rivera EM, Yamauchi M. Site comparisons of dentine collagen cross-links from extracted human teeth.
Arch Oral Biol.
1993;
38
541-546
-
106
Howe C A, McKendry D J.
Effect of endodontic access preparation on resistance to crown-root fracture.
J Am Dent Assoc.
1990;
121
712-715
-
107
Creugers N H, Mentink A G, Fokkinga W A et al.
5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations.
Int J Prosthodont.
2005;
18
34-39
-
108
Randow K, Glantz P O.
On cantilever loading of vital and non-vital teeth. An experimental clinical study.
Acta Odontol Scand.
1986;
44
271-277
-
109
Caplan D J, Kolker J, Rivera E M et al.
Relationship between number of proximal contacts and survival of root canal treated teeth.
Int Endod J.
2002;
35
193-199
-
110
Sorensen J A, Martinoff J T.
Endodontically treated teeth as abutments.
J Prosthet Dent.
1985;
53
631-636
-
111
Landolt A, Lang N P.
[Results and failures in extension bridges. A clinical and roentgenological follow-up study of free-end bridges].
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed.
1988;
98
239-244
-
112
Rosentritt M, Sikora M, Behr M et al.
In vitro fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of metallic and tooth-coloured post systems.
J Oral Rehabil.
2004;
31
675-681
-
113
Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F.
Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores.
Am J Dent.
2000;
13
15B-18B
-
114
Ben-Ur Z, Zimmermann A M.
Screw-type root canal post systems – accuracy and strength of root canal walls.
Quintessenz.
1983;
34
1325-1332
-
115
Assif D, Gorfil C.
Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth.
J Prosthet Dent.
1994;
71
565-567
-
116
Wegner S M, Wolfart S, Kern M.
In vivo study of the marginal integrity of composite resin buildups after full crown preparation.
J Adhes Dent.
2004;
6
151-155
Dr. Michael Naumann
Zahnärzte an der Kleinmachnover Schleuse
Wannseestr. 42
14532 Stahnsdorf
Phone: 03329/63262
Email: naumann@naumann-kiessling.de
