Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2010; 23(1): 051-058
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247856
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Laparoscopy for Colon and Rectal Cancer

Govind Nandakumar1 , James W. Fleshman1
  • 1Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 March 2010 (online)

ABSTRACT

Laparoscopy has emerged as a useful tool in the surgical treatment of diseases of the colon and rectum. Specifically, in the application of colon cancer, a laparoscopic-assisted approach offers short-term benefits to patients while maintaining a long-term oncologic outcome. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery may help decrease operative times while preserving the benefits of laparoscopy. The literature on the use of laparoscopy for rectal cancer is still in its early stages. Limited data suggest short-term benefits without compromising oncologic outcome; however, data from large multicenter trials will clarify the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal cancer. Robotic proctectomy is a novel technique that may offer considerable advantage and overcome some limitations laparoscopy creates while working in the confines of the pelvis. The improved magnification and visualization offered with the robot may also assist in preserving bladder and sexual function. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for the treatment of T1 rectal cancers with low-risk features appears to be safe. However, TEM has a significantly higher recurrence rate when used to treat invasive cancer. Endoluminal techniques and equipment are under development and could offer more minimally invasive approaches to the treatment of colon and rectal cancer. Credentialing and training of surgeons and teams involved in the use of laparoscopy is important prior to making these techniques ubiquitous.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Jacobs M, Verdeja J C, Goldstein H S. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;  1(3) 144-150
  • 2 Soop M, Nelson H. Is laparoscopic resection appropriate for colorectal adenocarcinoma?.  Adv Surg. 2008;  42 205-217
  • 3 Fleshman J, Sargent D J, Green E for The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.  Ann Surg. 2007;  246(4) 655-662, discussion 662–664
  • 4 Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop W C COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.  Lancet Oncol. 2005;  6(7) 477-484
  • 5 Guillou P J, Quirke P, Thorpe H MRC CLASICC trial group et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2005;  365(9472) 1718-1726
  • 6 Jayne D G, Guillou P J, Thorpe H UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.  J Clin Oncol. 2007;  25(21) 3061-3068
  • 7 Hewett P J, Allardyce R A, Bagshaw P F et al.. Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial.  Ann Surg. 2008;  248(5) 728-738
  • 8 Laparoscopically assisted colectomy is as safe and effective as open colectomy in people with colon cancer Abstracted from: Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand HS, et al; for the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.  , N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2050-2059 Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;  30(8) 707-709
  • 8a Weeks J C, Nelson H, Gelber S et al.. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized control trial.  JAMA. 2002;  287 321-328
  • 9 Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group . A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  350(20) 2050-2059
  • 9a Jackson T D, Kaplan G G, Arena G et al.. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes.  J Am Coll Surg. 2007;  204 439-446
  • 10 Tjandra J J, Chan M K. Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer.  Colorectal Dis. 2006;  8(5) 375-388
  • 11 Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E et al.. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16(7) 1121-1143
  • 12 Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop W C Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.  Lancet Oncol. 2009;  10(1) 44-52
  • 13 Kuhry E, Schwenk W F, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer H J. Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;  (2) CD003432
  • 14 Bonjer H J, Hop W C, Nelson H Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group et al. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis.  Arch Surg. 2007;  142(3) 298-303
  • 15 Lacy A M, García-Valdecasas J C, Delgado S et al.. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.  Lancet. 2002;  359(9325) 2224-2229
  • 16 Carter J J, Feingold D L, Kirman I et al.. Laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy is associated with decreased formation of postoperative pulmonary metastases compared with open cecectomy in a murine model.  Surgery. 2003;  134(3) 432-436
  • 17 Allendorf J D, Bessler M, Horvath K D, Marvin M R, Laird D A, Whelan R L. Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs laparoscopic bowel resection in mice.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12(8) 1035-1038
  • 18 Buunen M, Bonjer H J, Hop W C Color II Study Group et al. COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer.  Dan Med Bull. 2009;  56(2) 89-91
  • 19 Scala A, Huang A, Dowson H M, Rockall T A. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery - results from 200 patients.  Colorectal Dis. 2007;  9(8) 701-705
  • 20 Fiscon V, Frigo F, Migliorini G, Portale G, Lazzarini E. Laparoscopic colon resection by a single general surgeon in a community hospital: a review of 200 consecutive cases.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;  19(1) 13-17
  • 21 Marcello P W, Fleshman J W, Milsom J W et al.. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;  51(6) 818-826 discussion 826-828
  • 22 Targarona E M, Balague C, Cerdán G et al.. Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS) in cases of splenomegaly: a comparison analysis with conventional laparoscopic splenectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16(3) 426-430
  • 23 Aalbers A G, Biere S S, van Berge Henegouwen M I, Bemelman W A. Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22(8) 1769-1780
  • 24 Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis P P et al.. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;  13(3) 413-424
  • 25 Gao F, Cao Y F, Chen L S. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;  21(7) 652-656
  • 26 Heald R J, Moran B J, Ryall R D, Sexton R, MacFarlane J K. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.  Arch Surg. 1998;  133(8) 894-899
  • 27 Cecil T D, Sexton R, Moran B J, Heald R J. Total mesorectal excision results in low local recurrence rates in lymph node-positive rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;  47(7) 1145-1149 discussion 1149-1150
  • 28 Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;  50(4) 464-471
  • 29 Ng S S, Leung K L, Lee J F et al.. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;  15(9) 2418-2425
  • 30 Bretagnol F, Lelong B, Laurent C et al.. The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19(7) 892-896
  • 31 Law W L, Lee Y M, Choi H K, Seto C L, Ho J W. Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;  49(8) 1108-1115
  • 32 Morino M, Allaix M E, Giraudo G, Corno F, Garrone C. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19(11) 1460-1467
  • 33 Ströhlein M A, Grützner K U, Jauch K W, Heiss M M. Comparison of laparoscopic vs. open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective analysis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;  51(4) 385-391
  • 34 Havenga K, Enker W E, McDermott K, Cohen A M, Minsky B D, Guillem J. Male and female sexual and urinary function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for carcinoma of the rectum.  J Am Coll Surg. 1996;  182(6) 495-502
  • 35 Jayne D G, Brown J M, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou P J. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique.  Br J Surg. 2005;  92(9) 1124-1132
  • 36 Masui H, Ike H, Yamaguchi S, Oki S, Shimada H. Male sexual function after autonomic nerve-preserving operation for rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39(10) 1140-1145
  • 37 Liang J T, Lai H S, Lee P H. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;  14(4) 1285-1287
  • 38 Asoglu O, Matlim T, Karanlik H et al.. Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.  Surg Endosc. 2009;  23(2) 296-303
  • 39 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Laparoscopic Proctectomy for Curable Cancer Position Statement. Available at: http://www.fascrs.org/physicians/position_statements/laparoscopic_proctectomy/ Accessed January 23, 2010
  • 40 Baik S H, Kwon H Y, Kim J S et al.. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;  16(6) 1480-1487
  • 41 Baik S H, Ko Y T, Kang C M et al.. Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22(7) 1601-1608
  • 42 Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Casciola L. Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection.  JSLS. 2009;  13(2) 176-183
  • 43 Berguer R, Smith W. An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity.  J Surg Res. 2006;  134(1) 87-92
  • 44 Kapiteijn E, Putter H, van de Velde C J. Cooperative investigators of the Dutch ColoRectal Cancer Group . Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands.  Br J Surg. 2002;  89(9) 1142-1149
  • 45 Middleton P F, Sutherland L M, Maddern G J. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a systematic review.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48(2) 270-284
  • 46 Borschitz T, Heintz A, Junginger T. The influence of histopathologic criteria on the long-term prognosis of locally excised pT1 rectal carcinomas: results of local excision (transanal endoscopic microsurgery) and immediate reoperation.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;  49(10) 1492-1506, discussion 1500–1505
  • 47 Heintz A, Mörschel M, Junginger T. Comparison of results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical resection for T1 carcinoma of the rectum.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12(9) 1145-1148
  • 48 Winde G, Nottberg H, Keller R, Schmid K W, Bünte H. Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. anterior resection.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39(9) 969-976
  • 49 Bretagnol F, Merrie A, George B, Warren B F, Mortensen N J. Local excision of rectal tumours by transanal endoscopic microsurgery.  Br J Surg. 2007;  94(5) 627-633
  • 50 Floyd N D, Saclarides T J. Transanal endoscopic microsurgical resection of pT1 rectal tumors.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;  49(2) 164-168
  • 51 Lee W, Lee D, Choi S, Chun H. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical surgery for T1 and T2 rectal cancer.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17(8) 1283-1287
  • 52 Stipa F, Burza A, Lucandri G et al.. Outcomes for early rectal cancer managed with transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a 5-year follow-up study.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20(4) 541-545
  • 53 Zacharakis E, Freilich S, Rekhraj S et al.. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumors: the St. Mary's experience.  Am J Surg. 2007;  194(5) 694-698
  • 54 Dias A R, Nahas C S, Marques C F, Nahas S C, Cecconello I. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: indications, results and controversies.  Tech Coloproctol. 2009;  13(2) 105-111
  • 55 Fleshman J W. Transanal proctectomy using TEM in a cadaver model. Submitted to Journal of Surgical Endoscopy
  • 56 Senagore A J, Luchtefeld M A, Mackeigan J M. What is the learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy?.  Am Surg. 1995;  61(8) 681-685
  • 57 Simons A J, Anthone G J, Ortega A E et al.. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38(6) 600-603
  • 58 Wishner J D, Baker Jr J W, Hoffman G C et al.. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. The learning curve.  Surg Endosc. 1995;  9(11) 1179-1183
  • 59 The Society of American Colon and Rectal Surgeons . Laparoscopic Colectomy for Curable Cancer: Approved Statement.  Surg Endosc. 2004;  18(8) A1
  • 60 Ross H M, Simmang C L, Fleshman J W, Marcello P W. Adoption of laparoscopic colectomy: results and implications of ASCRS hands-on course participation.  Surg Innov. 2008;  15(3) 179-183

Govind NandakumarM.D. 

Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine

660 South Euclid Ave, Box 8109, St. Louis MO 63110

Email: doctorgovind@gmail.com

    >