Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010; 53(1): 1-8
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247504
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Supraorbital Craniotomy for Access to the Skull Base and Intraaxial Lesions: A Technique in Evolution

S. M. Raza1 , T. Garzon-Muvdi1 , K. Boaehene2 , A. Olivi1 , G. Gallia1 , M. Lim1 , P. Subramanian3 , A. Quinones-Hinojosa1
  • 1The Johns Hopkins Neuro-Oncology Surgical Outcomes Research Laboratory and Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • 2The Johns Hopkins Neuro-Oncology Surgical Outcomes Research Laboratory and Department of Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • 3The Johns Hopkins Neuro-Oncology Surgical Outcomes Research Laboratory and Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 April 2010 (online)

Abstract

Introduction: The supraorbital craniotomy was initially described as a minimally invasive means to target extra-axial lesions in the anterior cranial fossa and sellar/parasellar region. Since its initial description, various modifications have been described. We report our recent experience with this approach (and its modifications) for not only extra-axial but also intra-axial neoplastic pathology.

Methods: Based on patient pathology and anatomic considerations, one of two approaches was performed: supraorbital craniotomy through an eyebrow incision or a combined orbital osteotomy and supraorbital craniotomy through an eyelid incision.

Results: This technique was performed on twenty-eight consecutive patients. Intra-axial pathology ranged from anaplastic astrocytoma to metastasis while extra-axial lesions included meningiomas and skull-based metastases. Excellent lesion resection was achieved in the majority of patients. Complications were infection (2 patients) and CSF leak.

Discussion: The supraorbital craniotomy and its modifications provide an ideal anterior subfrontal approach through which a wide variety of pathology can be approached. This technique has particular considerations in comparison to traditional cranial base approaches that must be taken into account before it is utilized.

References

  • 1 Sanchez-Vazquez MA, Barrera-Calatayud P, Mejia-Villela M. et al . Transciliary subfrontal craniotomy for anterior skull base lesions.  Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1999;  91 892-896
  • 2 Reisch R, Perneczky A. Ten-year experience with the supraorbital subfrontal approach through an eyebrow skin incision.  Neurosurgery. 2005;  57 242-255 ; discussion 255
  • 3 Jho HD. Orbital roof craniotomy via an eyebrow incision: a simplified anterior skull base approach.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1997;  40 91-97
  • 4 Cohen AR, Perneczky A, Rodziewicz GS. et al . Endoscope-assisted craniotomy: approach to the rostral brain stem.  Neurosurgery. 1995;  36 1128-1129 ; discussion 1129–1130
  • 5 Ramos-Zuniga R, Velazquez H, Barajas MA. et al . Trans-supraorbital approach to supratentorial aneurysms.  Neurosurgery. 2002;  51 125-130 ; discussion 130–131
  • 6 Menovsky T, Grotenhuis JA, de Vries J. et al . Endoscope-assisted supraorbital craniotomy for lesions of the interpeduncular fossa.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  44 106-110 ; discussion 110–102
  • 7 Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shoja MM. et al . Emergency transorbital ventricular puncture: refinement of external landmarks.  J Neurosurg. 2009;  108
  • 8 Menovsky T, De Vries J, Wurzer JA. et al . Intraoperative ventricular puncture during supraorbital craniotomy via an eyebrow incision.  Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2006;  105 485-486
  • 9 Wilson DH. Limited exposure in cerebral surgery.  Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1971;  34 102-106
  • 10 Brock M, Dietz H. The small frontolateral approach for the microsurgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms.  Neurochirurgia Acta (Stuttg). 1978;  21 185-191
  • 11 Ramos-Zuniga R. The trans-supraorbital approach.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1999;  42 133-136
  • 12 Andaluz N, Romano A, Reddy LV. et al . Eyelid approach to the anterior cranial base.  J Neurosurg. 2008;  109 341-346
  • 13 Dare AO, Landi MK, Lopes DK. et al . Eyebrow incision for combined orbital osteotomy and supraorbital minicraniotomy: application to aneurysms of the anterior circulation.  Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2001;  95 714-718
  • 14 Jallo GI, Bognar L. Eyebrow surgery: the supraciliary craniotomy: technical note.  Neurosurgery. 2006;  59 ONSE 157-158 ; discussion ONS E157–158
  • 15 Jallo GI. Eyebrow surgery.  J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;  1 144 ; author reply 144
  • 16 Al-Mefty O, Ayoubi S, Kadri PA. The petrosal approach for the resection of retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas.  Neurosurgery. 2008;  62 ONS 331-335 ; discussion ONS 335–336
  • 17 Al-Mefty O, Ayoubi S, Kadri PA. The petrosal approach for the total removal of giant retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas in children.  J Neurosurg. 2007;  106 87-92
  • 18 Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM. et al . The pterional-transsylvian approach: an analytical study.  Neurosurgery. 2008;  62 1361-1367
  • 19 Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM. et al . The pterional-transsylvian approach: an analytical study.  Neurosurgery. 2006;  59 ONS 263-269 ; discussion ONS 269
  • 20 Andaluz N, van Loveren HR, Keller JT. et al . The one-piece orbitopterional approach.  Skull Base. 2003;  13 241-245
  • 21 Bognar L, Czirjak S, Madarassy G. Frontolateral keyhole craniotomy through a superciliary skin incision in children.  Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;  19 765-768
  • 22 Czirjak S, Szeifert GT. Surgical experience with frontolateral keyhole craniotomy through a superciliary skin incision.  Neurosurgery. 2001;  48 145-149 ; discussion 149–150
  • 23 Delashaw Jr JB, Tedeschi H, Rhoton AL. Modified supraorbital craniotomy: technical note.  Neurosurgery. 1992;  30 954-956
  • 24 Schwartz MS, Anderson GJ, Horgan MA. et al . Quantification of increased exposure resulting from orbital rim and orbitozygomatic osteotomy via the frontotemporal transsylvian approach.  J Neurosurg. 1999;  91 1020-1026
  • 25 Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh V, Nakaji P. et al . An anatomical evaluation of the mini-supraorbital approach and comparison with standard craniotomies.  Neurosurgery. 2006;  59 ONS 212-220 ; discussion ONS 220
  • 26 Czirjak S, Szeifert GT. The role of the superciliary approach in the surgical management of intracranial neoplasms.  Neurol Res. 2006;  28 131-137
  • 27 Fernandes YB, Maitrot D. et al . Supraorbital minicraniotomy.  Skull Base Surg. 1997;  7 65-68
  • 28 Jane JA, Park TS, Pobereskin LH. et al . The supraorbital approach: technical note.  Neurosurgery. 1982;  11 537-542
  • 29 Langsdon PR, Knipe TA, Whatley WS. et al . Transconjunctival approach to the zygomatico-frontal limb of orbitozygomatic complex fractures.  Facial Plast Surg. 2005;  21 171-175
  • 30 Kung DS, Kaban LB. Supratarsal fold incision for approach to the superior lateral orbit.  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;  81 522-525
  • 31 Lane CM. Cosmetic orbital surgery.  Eye. 2006;  20 1220-1223
  • 32 Chi JH, Parsa AT, Berger MS. et al . Extended bifrontal craniotomy for midline anterior fossa meningiomas: minimization of retraction-related edema and surgical outcomes.  Neurosurgery. 2006;  59 ONS 426-433 ; discussion ONS 433–424
  • 33 Lemole Jr GM, Henn JS, Zabramski JM. et al . Modifications to the orbitozygomatic approach.  Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003;  99 924-930
  • 34 Zabramski JM, Kiris T, Sankhla SK. et al . Orbitozygomatic craniotomy.  Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1998;  89 336-341

Correspondence

A. Quinones-HinojosaMD 

MD 21231 Baltimore

USA

Phone: +1/410/502 2906

Fax: +1/410/502 5559

Email: aquinon2@jhmi.edu

    >