Methode zur Messung, Bestätigung und Lokalisierung von Gelenkdysfunktionen und ihren Auswirkungen auf den Knorpel

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag stellt eine geometrische Methode zur Bestimmung der momentanen Bewegungsachsen (Zentroden) auf Röntgenbildern vor, mit der sich Bewegungsstörungen erfassen und messen lassen. Dies eröffnet insbesondere in der Forschung, aber auch in der Diagnose interessante Möglichkeiten. Die Messung der Lage von Zentroden bei normaler und pathologischer Gelenkfunktion sowie anormaler Zentroden in degenerierten oder traumatisierten Gelenken, die unterschiedlichen Zentrodenpositionen in belasteten und unbelasteten Gelenken sowie die Bedeutung der translatorischen im Vergleich zur passiven rotatorischen Bewegung mit dem Ziel der Normalisierung der Zentrodenpositionen werden erläutert.

Abstract

The article portrays a geometric method to determine the instantaneous motion axes (centrodes) on x-rays which allow detection and measurement of movement dysfunction. This provides interesting opportunities predominantly in research but also in diagnosis. Assessment of centrode position in normal and pathologic joint function as well as abnormal centrodes in degenerated or traumatic joints, variable centrode positions in loaded and unloaded joints and importance of translational in comparison to passive rotatory movement aiming at normalisation of centrode position are described.

Biomechanik - momentane Bewegungsachse - Zentrode - Oberflächengeschwindigkeit - Knorpeldegeneration - Radiologie

biomechanics - instantaneous motion axis - centrode - surface velocity - cartilage degeneration - radiology

Literatur

• 1 Binkley J, Stratford P W, Gill C. Interrater Reliability of Lumbar Accessory Motion Mobility Testing.  Physical Therapy. 1955;  75 786-792
• 2 Buchwalter J A, Mow V C. Cartilage repair in osteoarthritis. In Moscowitz R W, Howell D S, Goldberg V Osteoarthritis Diagnosis and Medical/Surgical Management.. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1992
• 3 Cook C, Turney L, Ramirez L et al. Predictive factors in poor inter-rater reliability among physical therapists.  Journal Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2002;  10 200-205
• 4 Cook C E. Effectiveness of Visual Perceptual Learning on Inter-Therapist Reliability of Lumbar Spine Mobilization. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice; 2003 http://www.ijahsp.nova.edu/articles/1vol2/CookEffectiveness.html
• 5 Dempster W T. Study of the Hinge Points of the Human Body. USAF Contract No. AF 18(600)-43. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Wright Air Development Center; 1953
• 6 Frankel V H, Burstein A H, Brooks D B. Biomechanics of Internal Derangements of the Knee.  The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am. 1971;  53 945-977
• 7 Grimsby O. Basic Sciences in Manual Therapy. A course workbook. San Diego: Ola Grimsby institute; 2005
• 8 Grimsby O. Residency (Doctor of Manual Therapy) Program (APTA credentialed). San Diego: Ola Grimsby Institute; 2006
• 9 Grimsby O. Fellowship program (APTA credentialed). San Diego: Ola Grimsby Institute; 2008
• 10 Grimsby O, Rivard J. Science, Theory and Clinical Application in Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy. Vol. 1: Applied Science and Theory. San Diego: Rivard; 2008
• 11 Grimsby O. Advanced Clinical Manual Therapy. A Ph. D. degree program. San Diego: Ola Grimsby Institute; 2010
• 12 Hanten W, Olson S, Ludwig M G. Reliability of Manual Mobility Testing of the Upper Cervical Spine in Subjects with Cervicogenic Headache.  Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2002;  10 76-82
• 13 Hartman L S. Handbook of Osteopathic Technique. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes; 1996
• 14 Helfet A J. The Management of Internal Derangements of the Knee. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1963
• 15 Hyc A, Osiecka-Iwan A, Jozwiak J et al. The Morphology and selected biological properties of articular cartilage.  Ortop Traumatology Rehabilitation. 2001;  3 151-162
• 16 Kaltenborn F M. The Spine. Oslo: Norli; 2003 Vol. 2. 4th ed
• 17 Kapandji A I. The Physiology of Joints. Vol. 1: Upper Limb. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2007
• 18 Kapandji A I. You said Biomechanics? It’s „Fuzzy” Mechanics!!. http://www.maitrise-orthop.com/corpusmaitri/orthopaedic/mo64_fuzzy_mechanics/index.shtml
• 19 Kapandji A I. The Physiology of the Joints. Vol. 2: Lower Limb. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2008
• 20 Koller F M (Hrsg).. Basiswissen Knorpel. physiopraxis.refresher 2.10.  Supplement Zeitschrift physiopraxis. 2010;  8
• 21 Lohne T, Grimsby O. Pilot Study. Kristiansand/Norway: Roentgeninstituttet; 2010
• 22 Panjabi M M, Goel V K, Walter S D. Errors in Kinematic Parameters of a Planar Joint: Guidelines for Optimal Experimental Design.  J Biomechanics. 1982;  15 537-544
• 23 Rivard J, Grimsby O. Science, Theory and Clinical Application in Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy. Vol. 2: The Neck and Upper Extremity – Scientific Therapeutic Exercise Progression (STEP). San Diego: Rivard; 2009
• 24 Rivard J, Grimsby O. Science, Theory and Clinical Application in Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy. Vol. 3: The Back and Lower Extremity – Scientific Therapeutic Exercise Progression (STEP). San Diego: Rivard; 2009
• 25 Rouleaux F. Theoretische Kinematik. Braunschweig: Vieweg; 1876
• 26 Schmidt T A, Schumacher B L, Han E H et al. Chemomechanical Coupling in Articular Cartilage: IL-1 alpha and TGF-beta 1 Regulate Chondrocyte Synthesis and Secretion of Proteoglycan 4. Symposium of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.  Physical Regulation of Skeletal Repair. 2005;  2 151-161
• 27 Thompson C T, Bulkeley P Z. Human Knee Motion. Stanford: Design Division Mechanical Engineering Department; 1968
• 28 Woo S LY, Buchwalter J A. Injury and Repair of the Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue. Park Ridge: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1991