CT-Angiografie zur prä- und postoperativen Evaluation in der thorakalen Aortenchirurgie

Zusammenfassung

Die CT-Angiografie hat einen bedeutenden Stellenwert in der prä- und postoperativen Evaluation von Patienten mit Pathologien der thorakalen Aorta. Die vorliegende Übersichtsarbeit erläutert die Grundlagen unter Berücksichtigung der technischen Fortschritte und Anforderungen an spezifische Untersuchungsprotokolle und geht in der Bildinterpretation und Auswertung auf typische prä- und postoperative Fragestellungen ein.

Abstract

CT angiography is the imaging modality of choice for the pre- and postsurgical evaluation of patients with pathologies of the thoracic aorta. The purpose of this review is to familiarize the reader with the technical principle, recent technical developments and requirements for specific examination protocols and image interpretation, and to highlight common pathologies and findings.

aorta - treatment planning - technical aspects - dissection - aneurysm

Literatur

• 1 Akin I, Kische S, Schneider H et al. Thoracic aorta aneurysms.  Internist. 2009;  50 964-971
• 2 Clouse W D, Hallett Jr J W, Schaff H V et al. Improved prognosis of thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study.  Jama. 1998;  280 1926-1929
• 3 Hiratzka L F, Bakris G L, Beckman J A et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine.  Circulation. 2010;  121 e266-e369
• 4 Wolak A, Gransar H, Thomson L E et al. Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area.  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;  1 200-209
• 5 Elefteriades J A, Farkas E A. Thoracic aortic aneurysm clinically pertinent controversies and uncertainties.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;  55 841-857
• 6 Braverman A C, Guven H, Beardslee M A et al. The bicuspid aortic valve.  Curr Probl Cardiol. 2005;  30 470-522
• 7 Leber A W, Johnson T, Becker A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease.  Eur Heart J. 2007;  28 2354-2360
• 8 Schlosser F J, Mojibian H R, Dardik A et al. Simultaneous sizing and preoperative risk stratification for thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair: role of gated computed tomography.  J Vasc Surg. 2008;  48 561-570
• 9 Theisen D, Tengg-Kobligk von H, Michaely H et al. CT angiography of the aorta.  Radiologe. 2007;  47 982-992
• 10 Brinster D R. Endovascular repair of the descending thoracic aorta for penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer disease.  J Card Surg. 2009;  24 203-208
• 11 Biddinger A, Rocklin M, Coselli J et al. Familial thoracic aortic dilatations and dissections: a case control study.  J Vasc Surg. 1997;  25 506-511
• 12 Coady M A, Davies R R, Roberts M et al. Familial patterns of thoracic aortic aneurysms.  Arch Surg. 1999;  134 361-367
• 13 Moore A G, Eagle K A, Bruckman D et al. Choice of computed tomography, transesophageal echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and aortography in acute aortic dissection: International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD).  Am J Cardiol. 2002;  89 1235-1238
• 14 Shiga T, Wajima Z, Apfel C C et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis.  Arch Intern Med. 2006;  166 1350-1356
• 15 Rousseau H, Chabbert V, Maracher M A et al. The importance of imaging assessment before endovascular repair of thoracic aorta.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;  38 408-421
• 16 Yoo S M, Lee H Y, White C S. MDCT evaluation of acute aortic syndrome.  Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;  48 67-83
• 17 LePage M A, Quint L E, Sonnad S S et al. Aortic dissection: CT features that distinguish true lumen from false lumen.  Am J Roentgenol. 2001;  177 207-211
• 18 Alexander S A, Rubin G D. Imaging the thoracic aorta: anatomy, technical considerations, and trauma.  Semin Roentgenol. 2009;  44 8-15
• 19 Neri E, Toscano T, Papalia U et al. Proximal aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion: presentation, management, and outcome.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  121 552-560
• 20 Klompas M. Does this patient have an acute thoracic aortic dissection?.  Jama. 2002;  287 2262-2272
• 21 Gaul C, Dietrich W, Friedrich I et al. Neurological symptoms in type A aortic dissections.  Stroke. 2007;  38 292-297
• 22 Godoy M C, Cayne N S, Ko J P. Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta: Preoperative and Postoperative Evaluation With Multidetector Computed Tomography.  J Thorac Imaging. 2010;  PMID 20395874
• 23 Altenbernd J, Schurmann K, Walterbusch G. Stent-graft therapy in a mobile thrombus in the thoracic aorta.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2008;  180 158-159
• 24 Muller M, Lachat M, Pfammatter T. Symptomatic endovascular aortic metastases of a mammary carcinoma – therapy using stent grafting.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2008;  180 667-669
• 25 Patel H J, Williams D M, Upchurch Jr G R et al. Long-term results from a 12-year experience with endovascular therapy for thoracic aortic disease.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;  82 2147-2153
• 26 Hoang J K, Martinez S, Hurwitz L M. MDCT angiography of thoracic aorta endovascular stent-grafts: pearls and pitfalls.  Am J Roentgenol. 2009;  192 515-524
• 27 Stone D H, Brewster D C, Kwolek C J et al. Stent-graft versus open-surgical repair of the thoracic aorta: mid-term results.  J Vasc Surg. 2006;  44 1188-1197
• 28 Bavaria J E, Appoo J J, Makaroun M S et al. Endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms in low-risk patients: a multicenter comparative trial.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;  133 369-377
• 29 Eggebrecht H, Plicht B, Kahlert P et al. Intramural hematoma and penetrating ulcers: indications to endovascular treatment.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;  38 659-665
• 30 Evangelista A, Mukherjee D, Mehta R H et al. Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta: a mystery in evolution.  Circulation. 2005;  111 1063-1070
• 31 Moizumi Y, Komatsu T, Motoyoshi N et al. Clinical features and long-term outcome of type A and type B intramural hematoma of the aorta.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;  127 421-427
• 32 Garzon G, Fernandez-Velilla M, Marti M et al. Endovascular stent-graft treatment of thoracic aortic disease.  Radiographics. 2005;  25 S229-S244
• 33 Piffaretti G, Tozzi M, Lomazzi C et al. Penetrating ulcers of the thoracic aorta: results from a single-centre experience.  Am J Surg. 2007;  193 443-447
• 34 Akhtar N J, Markowitz A H, Gilkeson R C. Multidetector computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of cardiac surgery patients.  Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;  48 117-139
• 35 Umana J P, Miller D C, Mitchell R S. What is the best treatment for patients with acute type B aortic dissections – medical, surgical, or endovascular stent-grafting?.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 S1840-1843 ; discussion S 1857–S1863
• 36 Svensson L G, Crawford E S, Hess K R et al. Experience with 1509 patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic operations.  J Vasc Surg. 1993;  17 357-368 ; discussion 368 – 370
• 37 Matsuda H, Fukuda T, Iritani O et al. Spinal cord injury is not negligible after TEVAR for lower descending aorta.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;  39 179-186
• 38 Kovacs A, Schiller W, Gerhards H M et al. Visualization of the Adamkiewicz artery in patients with acute stanford a dissections: a prospective 64-row multi-detector CT study.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2009;  181 870-874
• 39 Boll D T, Bulow H, Blackham K A et al. MDCT angiography of the spinal vasculature and the artery of Adamkiewicz.  Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  187 1054-1060
• 40 Siegenthaler M P, Weigang E, Brehm K et al. Endovascular treatment for thoracoabdominal aneurysms: outcomes and results.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;  34 810-819
• 41 Steenburg S D, Ravenel J G, Ikonomidis J S et al. Acute traumatic aortic injury: imaging evaluation and management.  Radiology. 2008;  248 748-762
• 42 Burkhart H M, Gomez G A, Jacobson L E et al. Fatal blunt aortic injuries: a review of 242 autopsy cases.  J Trauma. 2001;  50 113-115
• 43 Parmley L F, Mattingly T W, Manion W C et al. Nonpenetrating traumatic injury of the aorta.  Circulation. 1958;  17 1086-1101
• 44 Quint L E, Francis I R, Williams D M et al. Synthetic interposition grafts of the thoracic aorta: postoperative appearance on serial CT studies.  Radiology. 1999;  211 317-324
• 45 Hoang J K, Martinez S, Hurwitz L M. MDCT angiography after open thoracic aortic surgery: pearls and pitfalls.  Am J Roentgenol. 2009;  192 W20-W27
• 46 Sundaram B, Quint L E, Patel S et al. CT appearance of thoracic aortic graft complications.  Am J Roentgenol. 2007;  188 1273-1277
• 47 Katsumata T, Moorjani N, Vaccari G et al. Mediastinal false aneurysm after thoracic aortic surgery.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  70 547-552
• 48 Macari M, Chandarana H, Schmidt B et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: can the arterial phase at CT evaluation after endovascular repair be eliminated to reduce radiation dose?.  Radiology. 2006;  241 908-914
• 49 Fattori R, Nienaber C A, Rousseau H et al. Results of endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta with the Talent Thoracic stent graft: the Talent Thoracic Retrospective Registry.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;  132 332-339
• 50 Bangard C, Gawenda M, Lackner K. Transarterial occlusion of type 1 endoleak of the aortic arch by coil embolization and thrombin injection after endovascular therapy of retrograde Stanford A dissection.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2008;  180 926-928
• 51 Heikkinen M A, Arko F R, Zarins C K. What is the significance of endoleaks and endotension.  Surg Clin North Am. 2004;  84 1337-1352, vii
• 52 Leon Jr L R, Rodriguez H E. Aortic endograft migration.  Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2005;  17 363-373
• 53 Resch T, Koul B, Dias N V et al. Changes in aneurysm morphology and stent-graft configuration after endovascular repair of aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  122 47-52
• 54 Fairman R M, Criado F, Farber M et al. Pivotal results of the Medtronic Vascular Talent Thoracic Stent Graft System: the VALOR trial.  J Vasc Surg. 2008;  48 546-554
• 55 Matsumura J S, Cambria R P, Dake M D et al. International controlled clinical trial of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with the Zenith TX 2 endovascular graft: 1-year results.  J Vasc Surg. 2008;  47 247-257 ; discussion 257
• 56 Roos J E, Willmann J K, Weishaupt D et al. Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and prospective electrocardiography-assisted multi-detector row CT.  Radiology. 2002;  222 271-277
• 57 Blanke P, Bulla S, Baumann T et al. Thoracic aorta: prospective electrocardiographically triggered CT angiography with dual-source CT – feasibility, image quality, and dose reduction.  Radiology. 2010;  255 207-217
• 58 McMahon M A, Squirrell C A. Multidetector CT of Aortic Dissection: A Pictorial Review.  Radiographics. 2010;  30 445-460
• 59 Blanke P, Baumann T, Bulla S et al. Prospective ECG-triggered CT angiography of the thoracic aorta in patients with atrial fibrillation or accelerated heart rates: feasibility and image quality.  Am J Roentgenol. 2010;  194 W111-W114
• 60 Weissler A M, Peeler R G, Roehll Jr W H. Relationships between left ventricular ejection time, stroke volume, and heart rate in normal individuals and patients with cardiovascular disease.  Am Heart J. 1961;  62 367-378
• 61 Cieslinski A, Hui W K, Oldershaw P J et al. Interaction between systolic and diastolic time intervals in atrial fibrillation.  Br Heart J. 1984;  51 431-437
• 62 Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K et al. High-pitch electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography of the chest: initial results.  Invest Radiol. 2009;  44 728-733
• 63 Johnson T R, Krauss B, Sedlmair M et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience.  Eur Radiol. 2007;  17 1510-1517
• 64 Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y et al. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise.  Radiology. 2005;  237 945-951
• 65 Bae K T, Seeck B A, Hildebolt C F et al. Contrast enhancement in cardiovascular MDCT: effect of body weight, height, body surface area, body mass index, and obesity.  Am J Roentgenol. 2008;  190 777-784
• 66 Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T et al. Comparison of sequential and helical scanning for radiation dose and image quality: results of the Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography (PROTECTION) I Study.  Am J Roentgenol. 2010;  194 1495-1499
• 67 Takakuwa K M, Halpern E J, Gingold E L et al. Radiation dose in a „triple rule-out” coronary CT angiography protocol of emergency department patients using 64-MDCT: the impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index.  Am J Roentgenol. 2009;  192 866-872
• 68 Halpern E J. Triple-rule-out CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.  Radiology. 2009;  252 332-345
• 69 Sommer W H, Schenzle J C, Becker C R et al. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.  Invest Radiol. 2010;  45 64-71
• 70 Lu T L, Rizzo E, Marques-Vidal P M et al. Variability of ascending aorta diameter measurements as assessed with electrocardiography-gated multidetector computerized tomography and computer assisted diagnosis software.  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;  10 217-221
• 71 Burman E D, Keegan J, Kilner P J. Aortic root measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: specification of planes and lines of measurement and corresponding normal values.  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;  1 104-113