Lumbar Arachnoiditis and Thecaloscopy: Brief Review and Proposed Treatment Algorithm

Abstract

The term arachnoiditis describes the inflammation of the meninges and subarachnoid spaces. Lumbar arachnoiditis is characterized by obliterated nerve root sleeves and the adherence of nerve roots to each other in the proximity of the cauda equina, and may be secondary to infectious diseases or tumors, iatrogenic (subsequent to spinal surgery) or idiopathic. It is not very clearly defined epidemiologically or clinically, and various theories regarding its pathophysiology have been proposed; furthermore, its treatment is difficult because there is a lack of evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic gold standards. Thecaloscopy has been recently described as a novel technique for retrograde transcutaneous neuroendoscopic inspection of the subarachnoid structures of the lumbar thecal sac; it has also been suggested for the treatment of lumbar arachnoiditis. We here review the most modern techniques for the treatment of this disease such as thecaloscopy and neurostimulation.

Key words

lumbar arachnoiditis - thecaloscopy - neurostimulation

References

• 1 Beuls EA, van Mameren H, Vroomen PC. Caudascopic experiences and a new pathoanatomic concept for treatment of sciatica.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1996;  39 4-6
• 2 Burton CV. Lumbosacral arachnoiditis.  Spine. 1978;  3 24-30
• 3 de la Porte C, Siegfried J. Lumbosacral spinal fibrosis (spinal arachnoiditis). Its diagnosis and treatment by spinal cord stimulation.  Spine. 1983;  8 93-103
• 4 Day P. Arachnoiditis: a brief summary of the literature.  NZHTA Report. 2001;  33
• 5 Elkington JSC. Meningitis serosa circumscripta spinalis (spinal arachnoiditis).  Brain. 1936;  59 181-203
• 6 Epter RS, Helm S, Hayek SM. et al . Systematic review of percutaneous adhesiolysis and management of chronic low back pain in post lumbar surgery syndrome.  Pain Physician. 2009;  12 361-378
• 7 Faure A, Khalfallah M, Perrouin-Verbe B. et al . Arachnoiditis ossificans of the cauda equina. Case report and review of the literature.  J Neurosurg. 2002;  97 239-243
• 8 Fiume D, Sherkat S, Callovini GM. et al . Treatment of the failed back surgery syndrome due to lumbo-sacral epidural fibrosis.  Acta Neurochir. 1995;  64 116-118
• 9 French JD. Clinical manifestations of lumbar spinal arachnoiditis.  Surgery. 1946;  20 718-729
• 10 Gowers WR. Diseases of the Nervous System. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston & Co. 1888: 202
• 11 Hoffmann GS. Spinal arachnoiditis: what's the clinical spectrum?.  Part I. Spine. 1983;  8 538-540
• 12 Hoffmann GS, Ellsworth CH, Wells EE. et al . Spinal arachnoiditis: what's the clinical spectrum?.  Part II. Spine. 1983;  8 541-551
• 13 Horsley V. Chronic spinal meningitis: its differential diagnosis and surgical treatment.  Brit Med J. 1909;  1 513-517
• 14 Koerts G, Rooijakkers H, Abu-Serieh B. et al . Postoperative spinal adhesive arachnoiditis presenting with hydrocephalus and cauda equina syndrome.  Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2008;  110 171-175
• 15 Long DM. Chronic adhesive spinal arachnoiditis: pathogenesis, prognosis, and treatment.  Neurosurgery Quarterly. 1992;  2 296-319
• 16 Maurice V, Ropper AH. Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology. 7th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill 2001: 219-220
• 17 Nagayama M, Watanabe Y, Okumura A. et al . High-resolution single-slice MR myelography.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;  179 515-521
• 18 Nelson DW. Intraspinal therapy using methylprednisolone acetate. Twenty-three years of clinical controversy.  Spine. 1993;  18 278-286
• 19 Nelson DA, Landau WM. Intraspinal steroids: history, efficacy, accidentality and controversy with review of United States Food and Drug Administration report.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;  70 733-744
• 20 Petty PG, Hudgson P, Hare WS. Symptomatic lumbar spinal arachnoiditis: fact or fallacy?.  J Clin Neurosci. 2000;  7 395-399
• 21 Probst C. Spinal cord stimulation in 112 patients with epi-/intradural fibrosis following operation for lumbar disc herniation.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1990;  107 147-151
• 22 Shaw M, Russell J, Grossart K. The changing pattern of spinal arachnoiditis.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat. 1978;  41 97-107
• 23 Shimoji K, Ogura M, Gamou S. et al . A new approach for observing cerebral cisterns and ventricles via a percutaneous lumbosacral route by using fine, flexible fiberscopes.  J Neurosurg. 2009;  110 376-381
• 24 Wadia NH, Dastur DK. Spinal meningitis with radiculo-myelopathy, part 1. Clinical and radiological features.  J Neurol Sci. 1969;  8 259-261
• 25 Warnke JP, Tschabitscher M, Nobles A. Thecaloscopy: the endoscopy of the lumbar subarachnoid space. Part I: historical review and own cadaver studies.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2001;  44 61-64
• 26 Warnke JP, Koppert H, Bensch-Schreiter B. et al . Thecaloscopy. Part III: first clinical application.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2003;  46 94-99
• 27 Warnke JP, Mourgela S. Endoscopic treatment of lumbar arachnoiditis.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2007;  50 1-6
• 28 Warnke JP, Mourgela S. Lumbale adhäsive Arachnoiditis. Endoskopische Subarachnoepidurostomie als neue Behandlungsmöglichkeit.  Nervenarzt. 2007;  78 1182-1187
• 29 Wilkinson HA. Intrathecal Depo-Medrol: a literature review.  Clin J Pain. 1992;  8 49-56
• 30 Yasargil MG. Microneurosurgery. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1996, Vol. IVB.

Correspondence