Minimally Invasive Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Pain Induced by Spinal Metastatic Tumor

Abstract

Spinal metastatic tumor is a common problem and represents a challenging problem in oncology practice. Patients with osteolytic metastases often suffer from intractable local and/or radicular pain. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive, radiologically guided procedure whereby bone cement is injected into structurally weakened vertebrae to provide immediate biomechanical stability. Vertebroplasty is also used to relieve pain by stabilizing metastatically compromised vertebrae that are at risk of pathological burst fracture. In this retrospective study, a total of 57 patients (78 vertebrae) with spinal metastatic tumor were treated with PMMA vertebroplasty. The mean value of the visual analogue scale (VAS) was 8.1±0.67 preoperatively, and significantly decreased to 3.8±1.9 (1–8, p<0.015) one day after vertebroplasty. The mean VAS value 6 months after vertebroplsty was 2.8±2.0 (p<0.001). Mean injected bone cement amount in our study is 5.16±1.6 mL. The complication rate is about 21.8%, bone cement extravasation without neurological deficit is the most common complication. No new or adjacent vertebral fracture has occurred in more than 2 years follow-up. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive procedure that offers a remarkable advantage of effective and immediate pain relief with few complications.

vertebroplasty - spinal metastatic tumor - minimal invasive - spinal stability - PMMA - pain

References

• 1 Bilsky MH. New therapeutics in spine metastases.  Expert Rev Neurother. 2005;  5 831-840
• 2 Aaron AD. The management of cancer metastatic to bone.  JAMA. 1994;  272 1206-1209
• 3 Barron KD, Hirano A, Araki S. et al . Experiences with metastatic neoplasms involving the spinal cord.  Neurology. 1959;  9 91-106
• 4 Schiff D, O’Neill BP, Suman VJ. Spinal epidural metastasis as the initial manifestation of malignancy: clinical features and diagnostic approach.  Neurology. 1997;  49 452-456
• 5 Gokaslan ZL, York JE, Walsh GL. et al . Transthoracic vertebrectomy for metastatic spinal tumors.  J Neurosurg. 1998;  89 599-609
• 6 Schiff D, O’Neill BP, Wang CH. et al . Neuroimaging and treatment implications of patients with multiple epidural spinal metastases.  Cancer. 1998;  83 1593-1601
• 7 Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P. et al . Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. Technique, indications, and results.  Radiol Clin North Am. 1998;  36 533-546
• 8 Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ. et al . Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization.  Spine. 2000;  25 923-928
• 9 Nicola N, Lins E. Vertebral hemangioma: retrograde embolization-stabilization with methyl methacrylate.  Surg Neurol. 1987;  27 481-486
• 10 Binning MJ, Gottfried ON, Klimo Jr P. et al . Minimally invasive treatments for metastatic tumors of the spine.  Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2004;  15 459-465
• 11 Gangi A, Kastler BA, Dietemann JL. Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;  15 83-86
• 12 Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM. et al . Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;  18 1897-1904
• 13 Jensen ME, Kallmes DE. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of malignant spine disease.  Cancer J. 2002;  8 194-206
• 14 Weill A, Chiras J, Simon JM. et al . Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement.  Radiology. 1996;  199 241-247
• 15 Genant HK, Wu CY, Kuijk C van. et al . Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.  J Bone Miner Res. 1993;  8 1137-1148
• 16 Alvarez L, Perez-Higueras A, Quinones D. et al . Vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral tumors: postprocedural outcome and quality of life.  Eur Spine J. 2003;  12 356-360
• 17 Cheung G, Chow E, Holden L. et al . Percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with intractable pain from osteoporotic or metastatic fractures: A prospective study using quality-of-life assessment.  Can Assoc Radiol J. 2006;  57 13-21
• 18 Bilsky MH, Lis E, Raizer J. et al . The diagnosis and treatment of metastatic spinal tumor.  Oncologist. 1999;  4 459-469
• 19 Bilsky MH, Boakye M, Collignon F. et al . Operative management of metastatic and malignant primary subaxial cervical tumors.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;  2 256-264
• 20 Siddall PJ, Cousins MJ. Spinal pain mechanisms.  Spine. 1997;  22 98-104
• 21 Cortet B, Cotten A, Boutry N. et al . Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study.  J Rheumatol. 1999;  26 2222-2228
• 22 Black P. Spinal metastasis: current status and recommended guidelines for management.  Neurosurgery. 1979;  5 726-746
• 23 Ghogawala Z, Mansfield FL, Borges LF. Spinal radiation before surgical decompression adversely affects outcomes of surgery for symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression.  Spine. 2001;  26 818-824
• 24 Barragan-Campos HM, Vallee JN, Lo D. et al . Percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal metastases: complications.  Radiology. 2006;  238 354-362
• 25 Ahn H, Mousavi P, Chin L. et al . The effect of pre-vertebroplasty tumor ablation using laser-induced thermotherapy on biomechanical stability and cement fill in the metastatic spine.  Eur Spine J. 2007;  16 1171-1178
• 26 Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Fenton DC. et al . An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture.  Spine. 2001;  26 151-156
• 27 Ahn H, Mousavi P, Roth S. et al . Stability of the metastatic spine pre and post vertebroplasty.  J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;  19 178-182
• 28 Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE. et al . The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior.  Spine. 2001;  26 1537-1541
• 29 Panjabi MM, Thibodeau LL, Crisco 3rd JJ. et al . What constitutes spinal instability?.  Clin Neurosurg. 1988;  34 313-339
• 30 Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries.  Spine. 1983;  8 817-831
• 31 Kostuik JP, Errico TJ, Gleason TF. et al . Spinal stabilization of vertebral column tumors.  Spine. 1988;  13 250-256
• 32 Farooq N, Park JC, Pollintine P. et al . Can vertebroplasty restore normal load-bearing to fractured vertebrae?.  Spine. 2005;  30 1723-1730
• 33 Chen HH, Wang WK, Li KC. et al . Biomechanical effects of the body augmenter for reconstruction of the vertebral body.  Spine. 2004;  29 E382-E387
• 34 Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C. et al . Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture.  JAMA. 2001;  285 320-323
• 35 Berlemann U, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP. et al . Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2002;  84 748-752
• 36 Baroud G, Vant C, Wilcox R. Long-term effects of vertebroplasty: adjacent vertebral fractures.  J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2006;  16 265-280

Correspondence