Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2787-1828
Robot-Assisted Mastectomy and Immediate Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
Authors
Abstract
Robot-assisted mastectomy has emerged as an evolving technique in breast cancer surgery, with its advantage of improved visualization, precise dissection, and favorable aesthetic outcomes through limited hidden access. With proper patient selection, this approach has facilitated nipple-sparing mastectomy with good aesthetic outcome while maintaining oncologic safety. As an aesthetic outcome is one essential component of developing robot-assisted mastectomy, immediate breast reconstruction has been adapted to integrate with the procedure. While implant-based reconstruction remains the most commonly utilized option, autologous breast reconstruction, although technically more demanding, can also be successfully performed with appropriate modifications and microsurgical expertise, providing durable aesthetic and functional outcomes. This article reviews current reconstructive options with autologous breast reconstruction following robot-assisted mastectomy, discusses technical considerations unique to robotic approaches, and emphasizes the importance of individualized, patient-centered decision-making in reconstructive planning.
Keywords
robot-assisted mastectomy - breast reconstruction - nipple-sparing mastectomy - implant-based reconstruction - autologous breast reconstructionPublication History
Article published online:
02 February 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Kuo WL, Huang JJ, Huang YT. et al. Robot-assisted mastectomy followed by immediate autologous microsurgical free flap reconstruction: Techniques and feasibility in three different breast cancer surgical scenarios. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 20 (01) e1-e8
- 2 Allen B, Knutson A, Iftekhar N. et al. The present and future of robotic surgery in breast cancer and breast reconstruction. J Clin Med 2025; 14 (06) 2100
- 3 Kim SH, Park S, Lee DW, Park HS, Lew DH, Song SY. Early experience of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix after robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 154 (03) 512-520
- 4 Sözen S, Emir S. (eds). Breast Cancer Updates. InTechOpen; 2023
- 5 Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant: First report of surgical technique. Ann Surg 2017; 266 (02) e28-e30
- 6 Ryu JM, Kim JY, Choi HJ. et al. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: An initial experience of the Korea Robot-endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group (KoREa-BSG). Ann Surg 2022; 275 (05) 985-991
- 7 Park HS, Lee J, Lee DW. et al. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: An initial experience. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 15669
- 8 Holley HA, Hembrecht S, Smyth NM, Colbert M, Quondamatteo F, Hill ADK. Anatomical basis for sensory preservation in robotic mastectomy. Br J Surg 2025; 112 (11) znaf232
- 9 Toesca A, Invento A, Massari G. et al. Update on the feasibility and progress on robotic breast surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (10) 3046-3051
- 10 Ryu JM, Mok CW, Toesca A. et al. Consensus statement on robotic nipple sparing mastectomy expert panel. J Breast Cancer 2025; 28 (03) 180-192
- 11 Golara A, Kozłowski M, Lubikowski J, Cymbaluk-Płoska A. Types of breast cancer surgery and breast reconstruction. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16 (18) 3212
- 12 Donnely E, Griffin MF, Butler PE. Robotic surgery: A novel approach for breast surgery and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (01) e2578
- 13 Eltahir Y, Werners LLCH, Dreise MM, Zeijlmans van Emmichoven IA, Werker PMN, de Bock GH. Which breast is the best? Successful autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction: Patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (01) 43-50
- 14 Fontein DBY, Oros M, Held L, Giovanoli P, Pusic AL, Lindenblatt N. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Free-Flap Breast Reconstructive Surgery over Time (PRO-BREST). Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17 (03) 272-278
- 15 Pusic AL, Matros E, Fine N. et al. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after immediate breast reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35 (22) 2499-2506
- 16 Chen K, Zhang J, Beeraka NM, Song D, Sinelnikov MY, Lu P. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with gel implant and latissimus dorsi muscle flap: Our initial experience. Int J Med Robot 2023; 19 (05) e2528
- 17 Wong AW, Kuo WL, Cheong DC. et al. Six steps for a successful aesthetic free flap reconstruction after minimally invasive mastectomy: A retrospective case-control study. Int J Surg 2024; 110 (02) 645-653
- 18 Sanson C, Roulot A, Honart JF, Rimareix F, Leymarie N, Sarfati B. Robotic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: A prospective study of 138 procedures. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2021; 116 (02) 135-142
- 19 Schlenker JD, Bueno RA, Ricketson G, Lynch JB. Loss of silicone implants after subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 62 (06) 853-861
- 20 Song Y, Zeng J, Tian X, Zheng H, Wu X. A review of different breast reconstruction methods. Am J Transl Res 2023; 15 (06) 3846-3855
- 21 Rathat G, Herlin C, Bonnel C, Captier G, Duraes M. Endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral implant-based reconstruction: A case report. Am J Case Rep 2019; 20: 1812-1816
- 22 Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H. et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (02) 429-436
- 23 Joo OY, Song SY, Park HS, Roh TS. Single-port robot-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction with the Da Vinci SP Surgical System: First clinical report. Arch Plast Surg 2021; 48 (02) 194-198
- 24 Hanna KR, DeGeorge Jr BR, Mericli AF, Lin KY, Drake DB. Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: Acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70 (01) 10-15
- 25 Joo OY, Song SY, Lew DH, Park HS, Lee DW. Robotic harvest of a latissimus dorsi flap using a single-port surgical robotic system in breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2021; 48 (06) 577-582
- 26 Eo PS, Kim H, Lee JS, Lee J, Park HY, Yang JD. Robot-assisted latissimus dorsi flap harvest for partial breast reconstruction: Comparison with endoscopic and conventional approaches. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 44 (01) 38-46
- 27 Vourtsis SA, Paspala A, Lykoudis PM. et al. Robotic-assisted harvest of latissimus dorsi muscle flap for breast reconstruction: Review of the literature. J Robot Surg 2022; 16 (01) 15-19
- 28 Houvenaeghel G, Bannier M, Rua S. et al. Skin sparing mastectomy and robotic latissimus dorsi-flap reconstruction through a single incision. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17 (01) 176
- 29 Egan KG, Selber JC. Modern innovations in breast surgery: Robotic breast surgery and robotic breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2023; 50 (02) 357-366
- 30 Winocour S, Tarassoli S, Chu CK, Liu J, Clemens MW, Selber JC. Comparing outcomes of robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest to the traditional open approach in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (06) 1221-1225
- 31 Bailey EA, Bishop SN. Minimally invasive surgery in breast reconstruction: The past and future. In: Breast Cancer Updates. IntechOpen; 2023
- 32 Clemens MW, Kronowitz S, Selber JC. Robotic-assisted latissimus dorsi harvest in delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28: 20-25
- 33 Selber J. Robotic harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle for breast reconstruction. In: Breast Reconstruction – Current Perspectives and State of the Art Techniques. IntechOpen; 2013
- 34 Hammond JB, Egan KG, Selber JC. Robotic approaches to breast reconstruction. Plast Aesthet Res 2024; 11: 28
- 35 Chen K, Lu P. Preliminary evaluation of pectoralis major fascia use in robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with gel implant: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Int J Surg 2025; (e-pub ahead of print)
- 36 Farr DE, Haddock NT, Tellez J. et al. Safety and feasibility of single-port robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy. JAMA Surg 2024; 159 (03) 269-276
- 37 Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2018; 153 (10) 891-899
- 38 King BW, McCarter JH, Burns HR, Soleimani S, Maricevich MA, Yu JZ. Robotics in implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2023; 37 (03) 168-175
- 39 Huang JJ, Chuang EY, Cheong DC, Kim BS, Chang FC, Kuo WL. Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate microsurgical free flap reconstruction: Feasibility and aesthetic results - Case series. Int J Surg 2021; 95: 106143
- 40 Holm C, Mayr M, Höfter E, Ninkovic M. Perfusion zones of the DIEP flap revisited: A clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (01) 37-43
- 41 Kuo WL, Wong AW, Tsai CY. et al. Oncoplastic entirely robot-assisted approach: Incorporating robotic surgery in both mastectomy and DIEP flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025; 156 (04) 451e-460e
- 42 Chang DW. Breast reconstruction with microvascular MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39 (01) 3-10
- 43 Ramakrishnan VV. Microsurgical reconstruction of the breast: ‘The versatile lower abdomen’. Indian J Plast Surg 2004; 37 (02) 18-22
- 44 Huang Z, Chen Z, Fu X. et al. Single-incision robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: A comprehensive surgical technique and strategy. Gland Surg 2025; 14 (08) 1612-1621
- 45 Kim BS, Kuo WL, Cheong DC, Lindenblatt N, Huang JJ. Transcutaneous medial fixation sutures for free flap inset after robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49 (01) 29-33
- 46 Kuo WL, Huang JJ, Chu CH. et al. Comparative analysis of oncological and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional mastectomy for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2025; 51 (05) 109622
- 47 Gau RY, Chou HH, Tsai HP. et al. Long-term follow-up of surgical outcomes and oncological results of nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction through a single axillary incision with different approach methods. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32 (03) 2092-2102
- 48 Chen CF, Cheong DC, Kuo WL. et al. Clinical scenarios using thoracodorsal and lateral thoracic vessels versus internal mammary vessels in bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2025; (E-pub ahead of print)
- 49 Lin TE, Wong AW, Cheong DC, Kuo WL, Tsai HP, Huang JJ. Strategically shifting paradigms: the new era of DIEP flaps with minimally invasive mastectomy: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24 (01) 1072
- 50 Tsai CY, Kim BS, Kuo WL. et al. Novel port placement in robot-assisted DIEP flap harvest improves visibility and bilateral DIEP access: Early controlled cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152 (04) 590e-595e
