Neuropediatrics
DOI: 10.1055/a-2773-9462
Original Article

Utility and Prognostic Implications of Continuous Electroencephalogram Monitoring in Pediatric Intensive Care

Autor*innen

  • Alper Koker

    1   Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
  • Furkan Donbaloğlu

    2   Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
  • Erdem Çebişli

    1   Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
  • Nazan Ulgen Tekerek

    1   Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
  • Oğuz Dursun

    1   Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey

Abstract

Background

Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is increasingly used in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), but data on its diagnostic yield and prognostic value in critically ill children remain limited. This study evaluated EEG monitoring practices, seizure detection, treatment changes, and long-term epilepsy outcomes in a tertiary PICU.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 184 children (1 month–18 years) who underwent intermittent EEG or cEEG in a tertiary PICU between 2018 and 2022. Demographic and clinical features, EEG indications and findings, antiseizure treatment modifications, and outcomes were obtained from medical records. Primary outcomes were acute seizure control, occurrence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), and development of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) during follow-up.

Results

Ninety-eight patients (53.2%) had clinical seizures, and 86 (46.8%) underwent EEG for altered mental status or suspected encephalopathy. cEEG was used in 102/184 and intermittent EEG in 82/184 patients. Electrographic seizures were detected in 22/184 (12.0%); antiseizure therapy was modified in 17/22 based on EEG, and previously unsuspected nonconvulsive seizures were identified in 5/184 (2.7%). Acute seizure control during the PICU stay was achieved in 99/101 (98.0%) patients with documented seizures. Over a median follow-up of 8.0 months, newly diagnosed DRE occurred in 38/184 (20.7%), predominantly in patients with acute encephalopathy, hypoxic–ischemic injury, or central nervous system (CNS) infection.

Conclusion

In this pediatric PICU cohort, EEG—especially cEEG in high-risk patients—provided relevant information by improving electrographic seizure detection and guiding antiseizure management, while revealing a long-term burden of DRE. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to define the optimal role of EEG in pediatric neurocritical care.

Contributors' Statement

A.K.: Conceptualization, data curation, investigation, writing–original draft. F.D.: Data curation, methodology, resources. E.Ç.: Formal analysis, validation, writing–original draft. N.U.T.: Formal analysis, resources, software, writing–original draft. O.D.: Methodology, supervision, writing–review and editing.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 20. September 2025

Angenommen: 16. Dezember 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
17. Dezember 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. Dezember 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany