Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2770-5528
Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability of CT Assessment of Canine Elbow Sclerosis in the Absence of Elbow Pathology
Authors
Abstract
Objective
To establish a highly standardized elbow computed tomography (CT) examination protocol and evaluate inter- and intraobserver reliability of assessment of canine elbow sclerosis in the absence of elbow pathology.
Study Design
Dogs that presented for CT screening for elbow dysplasia prior to breeding were evaluated. Only dogs diagnosed with CT as being free of elbow dysplasia were included. The CT images were randomized and assessed by five blinded observers. Two observers re-reviewed 30 randomly selected studies on a second occasion. A standardized approach to CT image reconstruction to create consistent image planes was used. Sclerosis was subjectively as graded 0 (no sclerosis), 1 (mild sclerosis), and 2 (marked sclerosis). Objective assessment of sclerosis using Hounsfield units (HU) was measured within a standardized region of interest at the medial aspect of the humeral condyle (MAHC) and medial coronoid process (MCP).
Results
Complete agreement between observers in ordinal scoring of sclerosis was moderate for each region (MCP traditional 38.8%, MCP modified 28.6%, MAHC 26.5%). Intraobserver reliability of ordinal sclerosis scoring was poor to moderate. The inter- and intraobserver reliability of HU measurements was good to moderate, and good to excellent, respectively. Correlation between sclerosis scores and HU measurements was low to moderate.
Conclusion
Subjective and objective assessment of sclerosis of the MCP and MAHC in the absence of elbow pathology is unreliable despite the use of a highly standardized protocol.
Keywords
canine elbow dysplasia - elbow sclerosis - Hounsfield units - inter- and intraobserver reliability - medial coronoid processContributors' Statement
L.E., A. House and M.F. contributed to the conception, study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation. R.K. and H.D. contributed to the acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation. A.Hillman contributed to study design, data analysis and interpretation. All the authors drafted, revised, and approved the submitted manuscript and are publicly responsible for the relevant content.
Publication History
Received: 06 March 2025
Accepted: 10 December 2025
Article published online:
26 December 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Vezzoni A, Benjamino K. Canine elbow dysplasia: ununited anconeal process, osteochondritis dissecans, and medial coronoid process disease. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2021; 51 (02) 439-474
- 2 Moores AP, Benigni L, Lamb CR. Computed tomography versus arthroscopy for detection of canine elbow dysplasia lesions. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (04) 390-398
- 3 Hersh-Boyle RA, Chou PY, Kapatkin AS. et al. Comparison of needle arthroscopy, traditional arthroscopy, and computed tomography for the evaluation of medial coronoid disease in the canine elbow. Vet Surg 2021; 50 (Suppl. 01) O116-O127
- 4 Mostafa A, Nolte I, Wefstaedt P. The prevalence of medial coronoid process disease is high in lame large breed dogs and quantitative radiographic assessments contribute to the diagnosis. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018; 59 (05) 516-528
- 5 Shimizu N, Warren-Smith CM, Langley-Hobbs SJ. et al. Inter- and intraobserver agreement in interpretation of CT features of medial coronoid process disease. J Small Anim Pract 2015; 56 (12) 707-713
- 6 Draffan D, Carrera I, Carmichael S, Heller J, Hammond G. Radiographic analysis of trochlear notch sclerosis in the diagnosis of osteoarthritis secondary to medial coronoid disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (01) 7-15
- 7 Burton NJ, Toscano MJ, Barr FJ, Owen MR. Reliability of radiological assessment of ulnar trochlear notch sclerosis in dysplastic canine elbows. J Small Anim Pract 2008; 49 (11) 572-576
- 8 Kunst CM, Pease AP, Nelson NC, Habing G, Ballegeer EA. Computed tomographic identification of dysplasia and progression of osteoarthritis in dog elbows previously assigned OFA grades 0 and 1. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014; 55 (05) 511-520
- 9 Phillips A, Burton NJ, Warren-Smith CM, Kulendra ER, Parsons KJ. Topographic bone density of the radius and ulna in greyhounds and labrador retrievers with and without medial coronoid process disease. Vet Surg 2015; 44 (02) 180-190
- 10 Villamonte-Chevalier A, Dingemanse W, Broeckx BJ. et al. Bone density of elbow joints in Labrador retrievers and Golden retrievers: comparison of healthy joints and joints with medial coronoid disease. Vet J 2016; 216: 1-7
- 11 Wennemuth J, Tellhelm B, Eley N, von Pückler K. Computed tomography enhances diagnostic accuracy in challenging medial coronoid disease cases: an imaging study in dog breeding appeal cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020; 33 (05) 356-362
- 12 Humphreys WJ, Wilder K, Pettitt R, Comerford EJ, Maddox TW. CT attenuation of the medial coronoid process is reduced in dogs with medial coronoid disease but independent of arthroscopic disease severity. Am J Vet Res 2022; 83 (09) ajvr.21.10.0171
- 13 Gander Soares D, Allen MJ, Burton NJ. Bone density of the humeral condyle in Labrador retrievers with medial coronoid process disease. J Small Anim Pract 2022; 63 (11) 821-828
- 14 Burton NJ, Perry MJ, Fitzpatrick N, Owen MR. Comparison of bone mineral density in medial coronoid processes of dogs with and without medial coronoid process fragmentation. Am J Vet Res 2010; 71 (01) 41-46
- 15 Ellis LF, House AK, Shimura K, Frances M. Comparison of Hounsfield units within the humeral trochlea and medial coronoid process in a population of Labrador X Golden Retriever Guide Dogs and Border Collies. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2024; 37 (05) 223-229
- 16 R Core Team. 2023 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Accessed at: https://www.R-project.org/
- 17 Gamer M, Lemon J. 2019 irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement. R package version 0.84.1. Accessed at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=irr
- 18 Mangiafico S. 2023 rcompanion: Functions to Support Extension Education Program Evaluation. version 2.4.36. Rutgers Cooperative Extension. New Brunswick, New Jersey. Accessed at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcompanion
- 19 Signorell A. 2023 . DescTools: Tools for Descriptive Statistics. R package version 0.99.54. Accessed at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DescTools
- 20 Wickham H. Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016
- 21 Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15 (02) 155-163
- 22 Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. Boston (USA): Houghton Mifflin Company; 2003
- 23 McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22 (03) 276-282
- 24 Ellis LE. Reliability of computed tomography (CT) assessment of elbow sclerosis in dogs. Unpublished Data. 2024 . Peninsula Vet Emergency and Referral Hospital
- 25 Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005; 85 (03) 257-268
