Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2769-1318
Artificial Intelligence as the Ultimate Operative Assistant
Authors
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to become transformational in many aspects of modern society and has attracted significant interest within the field of medicine. This review outlines the foundational components of modern AI such as including machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, computer vision, and generative modeling, and examines their emerging applications within surgery. In the preoperative domain, AI-driven risk stratification models inform patient selection and resource allocation, while parallel advances in deep learning-enabled anatomic segmentation and three-dimensional reconstruction have the potential to streamline surgical planning by automating labor-intensive imaging workflows. Intraoperatively, maturing capabilities in phase recognition, anatomic identification, augmented reality overlay, and real-time decision support demonstrate the possibility for improved safety, workflow efficiency, and early recognition of surgical and physiologic challenges. And although the first fully autonomous AI-driven surgical robot in humans is likely still far off, the recent advances in robotic surgery suggest this may no longer be the purview of science fiction. For all its promise, significant challenges still persist for the robust implementation of AI into surgical workflows regarding data governance, algorithmic transparency, regulatory oversight, model generalizability, and, especially, many philosophical and ethical questions that remain unanswered.
Declaration of GenAI Use
The use of generative AI was employed to supplement the literature search for this review.
Publication History
Article published online:
09 January 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Turing AM. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 1950; 59: 433-460
- 2 McCarthy J, Minsky ML, Rochester N, Shannon CE. A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research project on artificial intelligence. AI Mag 1995; 27 (04) 12-12
- 3 Kaul V, Enslin S, Gross SA. History of artificial intelligence in medicine. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92 (04) 807-812
- 4 Akhtar ZB. Unveiling the evolution of generative AI (GAI): a comprehensive and investigative analysis toward LLM models (2021–2024) and beyond. J Electr Syst Inf Technol 2024; 11 (01) 22
- 5 Tong W, Zhang T. CodeJudge: evaluating code generation with large language models. Preprint posted online October 3, 2024.
- 6 Sengar SS, Hasan AB, Kumar S, Carroll F. Generative artificial intelligence: a systematic review and applications. Multimedia Tools Appl 2025; 84 (21) 23661-23700
- 7 Chiew CJ, Liu N, Wong TH, Sim YE, Abdullah HR. Utilizing machine learning methods for preoperative prediction of postsurgical mortality and intensive care unit admission. Ann Surg 2020; 272 (06) 1133-1139
- 8 Mahajan A, Esper S, Oo TH. et al. Development and validation of a machine learning model to identify patients before surgery at high risk for postoperative adverse events. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (07) e2322285
- 9 Graeßner M, Jungwirth B, Frank E. et al. Enabling personalized perioperative risk prediction by using a machine-learning model based on preoperative data. Sci Rep 2023; 13 (01) 7128
- 10 Shelley B, Shaw M. Machine learning and preoperative risk prediction: the machines are coming. Br J Anaesth 2024; 133 (05) 925-930
- 11 Oh MY, Kim HS, Jung YM, Lee HC, Lee SB, Lee SM. Compact machine learning model for perioperative stroke prediction prior to surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep 2025; 15 (01) 40871
- 12 Mühlbauer J, Gottstein L, Egen L. et al. AI-driven preoperative risk assessment in kidney cancer surgery: a comparative feasibility study of machine learning models. BJUI Compass 2025; 6 (10) e70080
- 13 Hernandez MC, Chen C, Nguyen A. et al. Explainable machine learning model to preoperatively predict postoperative complications in inpatients with cancer undergoing major operations. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2024; 8: e2300247
- 14 Fritz BA, King CR, Abdelhack M. et al. Effect of machine learning models on clinician prediction of postoperative complications: the perioperative ORACLE randomised clinical trial. Br J Anaesth 2024; 133 (05) 1042-1050
- 15 Trebeschi S, van Griethuysen JJM, Lambregts DMJ. et al. Deep learning for fully-automated localization and segmentation of rectal cancer on multiparametric MR. Sci Rep 2017; 7 (01) 5301
- 16 Zhang Z, Han J, Ji W. et al. Improved deep learning for automatic localisation and segmentation of rectal cancer on T2-weighted MRI. J Med Radiat Sci 2024; 71 (04) 509-518
- 17 Xia S, Li Q, Zhu HT. et al. Fully semantic segmentation for rectal cancer based on post-nCRT MRl modality and deep learning framework. BMC Cancer 2024; 24 (01) 315
- 18 Zhang Y, Salahuddin Z, Khan D. et al. A foundation model framework for multi-view MRI classification of extramural vascular invasion and mesorectal fascia invasion in rectal cancer. Preprint posted online May 23, 2025.
- 19 Guerriero L, Quero G, Diana M. et al. Virtual reality exploration and planning for precision colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61 (06) 719-723
- 20 Bracale U, Iacone B, Tedesco A. et al. The use of mixed reality in the preoperative planning of colorectal surgery: preliminary experience with a narrative review. Cir Esp (Engl Ed) 2024; 102 (Suppl. 01) S36-S44
- 21 Mank QJ, Thabit A, Maat APWM. et al. State-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods for pre-operative planning of cardiothoracic surgery and interventions: a narrative review. J Thorac Dis 2025; 17 (07) 5282-5297
- 22 Chen X, Dai C, Peng M. et al. Artificial intelligence driven 3D reconstruction for enhanced lung surgery planning. Nat Commun 2025; 16 (01) 4086
- 23 Li L, Cheng S, Li J. et al. Randomized comparison of AI enhanced 3D printing and traditional simulations in hepatobiliary surgery. NPJ Digit Med 2025; 8 (01) 293
- 24 Elhage SA, Deerenberg EB, Ayuso SA. et al. Development and validation of image-based deep learning models to predict surgical complexity and complications in abdominal wall reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2021; 156 (10) 933-940
- 25 Park KB, Kim MS, Yoon DK, Jeon YD. Clinical validation of a deep learning-based approach for preoperative decision-making in implant size for total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19 (01) 637
- 26 Anwar A, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Li J. Artificial intelligence technology improves the accuracy of preoperative planning in primary total hip arthroplasty. Asian J Surg 2024; 47 (07) 2999-3006
- 27 Bertolino L, Ranzini MBM, Favaro A, Bardi E, Ronzoni FL, Bonanzinga T. Use of artificial intelligence on imaging and preoperatory planning of the knee joint: a scoping review. Medicina (Kaunas) 2025; 61 (04) 737
- 28 Bocanegra-Becerra JE, Neves Ferreira JS, Simoni G. et al. Machine learning algorithms for neurosurgical preoperative planning: a scoping review. World Neurosurg 2025; 194: 123465
- 29 Golany T, Aides A, Freedman D. et al. Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (12) 9215-9223
- 30 Yang HY, Hong SS, Yoon J. et al. Deep learning-based surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28 (04) 466-473
- 31 Liao W, Zhu Y, Zhang H. et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted phase recognition and skill assessment in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Front Surg 2025; 12: 1551838
- 32 Garrow CR, Kowalewski KF, Li L. et al. Machine learning for surgical phase recognition: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2021; 273 (04) 684-693
- 33 Jalal NA, Alshirbaji TA, Möller K. Evaluating convolutional neural network and hidden Markov model for recognising surgical phases in sigmoid resection. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 2018; 4 (01) 415-418
- 34 Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H. et al. Real-time automatic surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy using the convolutional neural network-based deep learning approach. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (11) 4924-4931
- 35 Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H. et al. Deep learning-based automatic surgical step recognition in intraoperative videos for transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (02) 1143-1151
- 36 Kolbinger FR, Bodenstedt S, Carstens M. et al. Artificial Intelligence for context-aware surgical guidance in complex robot-assisted oncological procedures: an exploratory feasibility study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50 (12) 106996
- 37 Honda R, Kitaguchi D, Ishikawa Y. et al. Deep learning-based surgical step recognition for laparoscopic right-sided colectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409 (01) 309
- 38 Wu S, Chen Z, Liu R. et al; Youth Committee of Pancreatic Disease of Sichuan Doctor Association (YCPD). SurgSmart: an artificial intelligent system for quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an observational study. Int J Surg 2023; 109 (05) 1105-1114
- 39 Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H, Saito K. et al. Automated surgical-phase recognition for robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy using artificial intelligence. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29 (11) 6847-6855
- 40 You J, Cai H, Wang Y. et al. Artificial intelligence automated surgical phases recognition in intraoperative videos of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (09) 4894-4905
- 41 Komatsu M, Kitaguchi D, Yura M. et al. Automatic surgical phase recognition-based skill assessment in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using multicenter videos. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27 (01) 187-196
- 42 Khanna A, Antolin A, Bar O. et al. Automated identification of key steps in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using artificial intelligence. J Urol 2024; 211 (04) 575-584
- 43 Yeh HH, Jain AM, Fox O, Wang SY. PhacoTrainer: a multicenter study of deep learning for activity recognition in cataract surgical videos. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2021; 10 (13) 23
- 44 Fugazzola P, Cobianchi L, Di Martino M. et al; S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. Collaborative Group. Prediction of morbidity and mortality after early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18 (01) 20
- 45 Balla A, Quaresima S, Corona M. et al. ATOM classification of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of a single institution experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29 (02) 206-212
- 46 Tokuyasu T, Iwashita Y, Matsunobu Y. et al. Development of an artificial intelligence system using deep learning to indicate anatomical landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2021; 35 (04) 1651-1658
- 47 Nakanuma H, Endo Y, Fujinaga A. et al. An intraoperative artificial intelligence system identifying anatomical landmarks for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical feasibility trial (J-SUMMIT-C-01). Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (03) 1933-1942
- 48 Kawamura M, Endo Y, Fujinaga A. et al. Development of an artificial intelligence system for real-time intraoperative assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (11) 8755-8763
- 49 Leifman G, Golany T, Rivlin E, Khoury W, Assalia A, Reissman P. Real-time artificial intelligence validation of critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intell Based Med 2024; 10: 100153
- 50 Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri MS. et al. Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2022; 276 (02) 363-369
- 51 Hong WY, Kao CL, Kuo YH, Wang JR, Chang WL, Shih CS. CholecSeg8k: a semantic segmentation dataset for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on Cholec80. arXiv. Preprint posted online December 23, 2020. doi:/arXiv.2012.12453
- 52 Smithmaitrie P, Khaonualsri M, Sae-Lim W, Wangkulangkul P, Jearanai S, Cheewatanakornkul S. Development of deep learning framework for anatomical landmark detection and guided dissection line during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Heliyon 2024; 10 (03) e25210
- 53 Protserov S, Hunter J, Zhang H. et al. Development, deployment and scaling of operating room-ready artificial intelligence for real-time surgical decision support. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7 (01) 231
- 54 Igaki T, Kitaguchi D, Kojima S. et al. Artificial intelligence-based total mesorectal excision plane navigation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65 (05) e329-e333
- 55 Suzuki Y, Kitaguchi D, Kosugi N. et al. Artificial intelligence-guided total mesorectal excision: development of a deep learning model to identify the pelvic fascial plane anatomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2025; 9 (06) 1225-1232
- 56 Skinner G, Chen T, Jentis G. et al. Real-time near infrared artificial intelligence using scalable non-expert crowdsourcing in colorectal surgery. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7 (01) 99
- 57 Narihiro S, Kitaguchi D, Hasegawa H, Takeshita N, Ito M. Deep learning-based real-time ureter identification in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67 (10) e1596-e1599
- 58 Ryu S, Goto K, Imaizumi Y, Nakabayashi Y. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery with anatomical recognition with artificial intelligence assistance for nerves and dissection layers. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31 (03) 1690-1691
- 59 Kojima S, Kitaguchi D, Igaki T. et al. Deep-learning-based semantic segmentation of autonomic nerves from laparoscopic images of colorectal surgery: an experimental pilot study. Int J Surg 2023; 109 (04) 813-820
- 60 Han F, Zhong G, Zhi S. et al. Artificial intelligence recognition system of pelvic autonomic nerve during total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2025; 68 (03) 308-315
- 61 Ryu S, Imaizumi Y, Goto K. et al. Artificial intelligence-enhanced navigation for nerve recognition and surgical education in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2025; 39 (02) 1388-1396
- 62 Ryu K, Kitaguchi D, Nakajima K. et al. Deep learning-based vessel automatic recognition for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (01) 171-178
- 63 Takeshita N, Sakamoto S, Kitaguchi D. et al. Deep learning-based seminal vesicle and vas deferens recognition in the posterior approach of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology 2023; 173: 98-103
- 64 Gon Park S, Park J, Rock Choi H. et al. Deep learning model for real–time semantic segmentation during intraoperative robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol Open Sci 2024; 62: 47-53
- 65 Chen G, Xie Y, Yang B. et al. Artificial intelligence model for perigastric blood vessel recognition during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in locally advanced gastric cancer. BJS Open 2024; 9 (01) zrae158
- 66 Shi J, Cui R, Wang Z. et al. Deep learning HRNet FCN for blood vessel identification in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. NPJ Digit Med 2025; 8 (01) 235
- 67 Petropoulou T, Simoens J, Polydorou A, De Backer P, Mottrie A. World's first live AI-assisted augmented reality (AR) robotic colon surgery with instrument deocclusion: navigating the future of surgery. Colorectal Dis 2025; 27 (11) e70296
- 68 Tanzi L, Piazzolla P, Porpiglia F, Vezzetti E. Real-time deep learning semantic segmentation during intra-operative surgery for 3D augmented reality assistance. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2021; 16 (09) 1435-1445
- 69 Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Volpi G. et al. Artificial intelligence 3D augmented reality-guided robotic prostatectomy versus cognitive mri intervention: results of the prospective randomized RIDERS trial. Eur Urol 2025; S0302-2838 (25)04733-5
- 70 Huang K, Liao J, He J. et al. A real-time augmented reality system integrated with artificial intelligence for skin tumor surgery: experimental study and case series. Int J Surg 2024; 110 (06) 3294-3306
- 71 Sadeghi AH, Mank Q, Tuzcu AS. et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted augmented reality robotic lung surgery: navigating the future of thoracic surgery. JTCVS Tech 2024; 26: 121-125
- 72 Wang X, Yang J, Zhou B, Tang L, Liang Y. Integrating mixed reality, augmented reality, and artificial intelligence in complex liver surgeries: enhancing precision, safety, and outcomes. ILIVER 2025; 4 (02) 100167
- 73 Ifeoma Anene J, Sharma A, Sharma A. et al. Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and augmented reality (AR) in neurological disease management: a narrative review. Cureus 2025; 17 (06) e86614
- 74 Ye RZ, Iezzi R. Intraoperative augmented reality for vitreoretinal surgery using edge computing. bioRxiv . Preprint posted online November 26, 2024.
- 75 Magalhães R, Oliveira A, Terroso D. et al. Mixed reality in the operating room: a systematic review. J Med Syst 2024; 48 (01) 76
- 76 Pangal DJ, Kugener G, Zhu Y. et al. Expert surgeons and deep learning models can predict the outcome of surgical hemorrhage from 1 min of video. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 8137
- 77 Mascarenhas M, Mendes F, Fonseca F. et al. A novel deep learning model for predicting colorectal anastomotic leakage: a pioneer multicenter transatlantic study. J Clin Med 2025; 14 (15) 5462
- 78 Singaravelu A, Mc Entee PD, Hardy NP. et al. Clinical evaluation of real-time artificial intelligence provision of expert representation in indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during colorectal resections. Int J Surg 2024; 110 (12) 8246-8249
- 79 Mc Entee PD, Delaney C, Guan S, Murphy E, Mac Aonghusa P, Cahill RA. AUGUR-AI: a real-time artificial intelligence interpreter for indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2025;
- 80 Park KB, Lee H, Kim S. et al. Predicting anastomosis or stump leakage after laparoscopic gastrectomy: a deep learning approach to intraoperative image analysis. J Gastric Cancer 2025; 25 (04) 528-540
- 81 Nakamura W, Sumitomo M, Zennami K. et al. Combination of deep learning and ensemble machine learning using intraoperative video images strongly predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2023; 6 (09) e1861
- 82 Lee S, Lee HC, Chu YS. et al. Deep learning models for the prediction of intraoperative hypotension. Br J Anaesth 2021; 126 (04) 808-817
- 83 Lee SM, Lee G, Kim TK. et al. Development and validation of a prediction model for need for massive transfusion during surgery using intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring data. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5 (12) e2246637
- 84 Xue B, Li D, Lu C. et al. Use of machine learning to develop and evaluate models using preoperative and intraoperative data to identify risks of postoperative complications. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (03) e212240
- 85 Park S, Chung S, Kim Y. et al. A deep-learning algorithm using real-time collected intraoperative vital sign signals for predicting acute kidney injury after major non-cardiac surgeries: a modelling study. PLoS Med 2025; 22 (04) e1004566
- 86 Loftus TJ, Tighe PJ, Filiberto AC. et al. Artificial intelligence and surgical decision-making. JAMA Surg 2020; 155 (02) 148-158
- 87 Binkley CE, Green BP. Does intraoperative artificial intelligence decision support pose ethical issues?. JAMA Surg 2021; 156 (09) 809-810
- 88 Saeidi H, Opfermann JD, Kam M. et al. Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis. Sci Robot 2022; 7 (62) eabj2908
- 89 Kim JWB, Chen JT, Hansen P. et al. SRT-H: a hierarchical framework for autonomous surgery via language-conditioned imitation learning. Sci Robot 2025; 10 (104) eadt5254
- 90 Wu S, Tang M, Liu J. et al. Impact of an AI-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy coaching program on the surgical performance: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 2024; 110 (12) 7816-7823
- 91 Cheng K, Wu S, Peng B, Wang X. An artificial intelligence-enhanced coaching mode. Int J Surg 2025; 111 (09) 6469-6472
- 92 Lavanchy JL, Zindel J, Kirtac K. et al. Automation of surgical skill assessment using a three-stage machine learning algorithm. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 5197
- 93 Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H, Igaki T, Hasegawa H, Ito M. Development and validation of a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network for automatic surgical skill assessment based on spatiotemporal video analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (08) e2120786
- 94 Igaki T, Kitaguchi D, Matsuzaki H. et al. Automatic surgical skill assessment system based on concordance of standardized surgical field development using artificial intelligence. JAMA Surg 2023; 158 (08) e231131
- 95 Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Witkowski ER. et al. Computer vision analysis of intraoperative video: automated recognition of operative steps in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg 2019; 270 (03) 414-421
- 96 Sato K, Takenaka S, Kitaguchi D. et al. Objective surgical skill assessment based on automatic recognition of dissection and exposure times in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2025; 410 (01) 39
- 97 Harari RE, Dias RD, Kennedy-Metz LR. et al. Deep learning analysis of surgical video recordings to assess nontechnical skills. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (07) e2422520
- 98 van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, Middel LJ, Koopal SA, Pierie JPEN. The learning effect of intraoperative video-enhanced surgical procedure training. Surg Endosc 2011; 25 (07) 2261-2267
- 99 Abdelhady AM, Davis CR. Plastic surgery and artificial intelligence: how ChatGPT improved operation note accuracy, time, and education. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health 2023; 1 (03) 299-308
- 100 Robinson A, Aggarwal Jr S. When precision meets penmanship: ChatGPT and surgery documentation. Cureus 2023; 15 (06) e40546
- 101 Ali A, Kumar RP, Polavarapu H. et al. Bridging the gap: can large language models match human expertise in writing neurosurgical operative notes?. World Neurosurg 2024; 192: e34-e41
- 102 Khanna A, Wolf T, Frank I. et al. Enhancing accuracy of operative reports with automated artificial intelligence analysis of surgical video. J Am Coll Surg 2025; 240 (05) 739-746
- 103 Isch EL, Lee J, Self DM. et al. Artificial intelligence in surgical coding: evaluating large language models for current procedural terminology accuracy in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2025; 7 (02) 181-185
- 104 Huppert Steed A, Nwosu K, Fillingham P. et al. Artificial intelligence and natural language processing for automated coding of cervical and lumbar spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2025; 43 (04) 519-524
- 105 Aung YYM, Wong DCS, Ting DSW. The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Br Med Bull 2021; 139 (01) 4-15
- 106 Petersson L, Larsson I, Nygren JM. et al. Challenges to implementing artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative interview study with healthcare leaders in Sweden. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22 (01) 850
- 107 Nair M, Svedberg P, Larsson I, Nygren JM. A comprehensive overview of barriers and strategies for AI implementation in healthcare: mixed-method design. PLoS One 2024; 19 (08) e0305949
- 108 Ahmed MI, Spooner B, Isherwood J, Lane M, Orrock E, Dennison A. A systematic review of the barriers to the implementation of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Cureus 2023; 15 (10) e46454
- 109 Li YH, Li YL, Wei MY, Li GY. Innovation and challenges of artificial intelligence technology in personalized healthcare. Sci Rep 2024; 14 (01) 18994
- 110 Landon S, Savage T, Greysen SR, Bressman E. Variation in large language model recommendations in challenging inpatient management scenarios. J Gen Intern Med 2025;
- 111 Spielberg S. Jurassic Park. Universal Pictures; 1993
