Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2749-6487
Percutaneous Fracture Reduction of Cadaveric Feline Tibiae (Gap Model) Using Computed Tomography, Computer Design Software, and Three-dimensional–printed Fixateur Externe Type 1
Authors
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate percutaneous reduction of feline tibial fractures (gap model) using a three-dimensional–printed external skeletal fixator (jig) and assess the contralateral tibia as a template for virtual planning.
Study Design
Postmortem computed tomography (CT) was performed on 11 skeletally mature feline specimens. A mid-shaft tibial fracture gap model was created, followed by the placement of two lead-marked K-wires per fragment. The DICOMS images of repeated CT scans were imported into the virtual planning software to design a specimen-specific jig using the contralateral side as a template. The jig housed the leads and acted as a connecting bar to facilitate fracture reduction. Post-procedure radiography and CT were performed to evaluate fracture reduction.
Results
A total of 22 tibiae of 11 cats were reduced using a jig. There was an average difference of <1 mm in terms of tibial length and <5 degrees in joint angulations and in terms of rotation when comparing the post-procedure tibia with the initial CT/radiograph (p < 0.05). The alignment was considered anatomical in 16 of 21 limbs and acceptable in 5 of 21 limbs. Pin loosening occurred in one case during the jig process.
Conclusion
Temporary fracture reduction using the three-dimensional–printed jig was feasible and accurate in 21 of the 22 procedures. When using the contralateral tibia as a template, an asymmetry of up to 6% in terms of joint angulations should be considered.
Publication History
Received: 02 January 2025
Accepted: 17 November 2025
Article published online:
16 December 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Seaman JA, Simpson AM. Tibial fractures. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2004; 19 (03) 151-167
- 2 Zurita M, Craig A. Feline diaphyseal fractures: management and treatment options. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24 (07) 662-674
- 3 Pozzi A, Risselada M, Winter MD. Assessment of fracture healing after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis or open reduction and internal fixation of coexisting radius and ulna fractures in dogs via ultrasonography and radiography. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 241 (06) 744-753
- 4 Mizuno K, Mineo K, Tachibana T, Sumi M, Matsubara T, Hirohata K. The osteogenetic potential of fracture haematoma. Subperiosteal and intramuscular transplantation of the haematoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72 (05) 822-829
- 5 Jin C, Weng D, Yang W, He W, Liang W, Qian Y. Minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis versus ORIF for Sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized intervention trial. J Orthop Surg Res 2017; 12 (01) 10
- 6 Li F, Liu X, Wang F. et al. Comparison between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction-internal fixation for proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis based on 1050 individuals. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20 (01) 550
- 7 Worth AJ. Management of fractures of the long bones of eight cats using external skeletal fixation and a tied-in intra-medullary pin with a resin-acrylic bar. N Z Vet J 2007; 55 (04) 191-197
- 8 Kim YG, Park KH, Kim JW. et al. Is minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis superior to open plating for fixation of two-part fracture of the proximal humerus?. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2019; 27 (02) 2309499019836156
- 9 Orapiriyakul W, Apivatthakakul V, Theppariyapol B, Apivatthakakul T. Humerus shaft fractures, approaches and management. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2023; 43: 102230
- 10 Robinson WP, Knowles TG, Barthelemy NP, Parsons KJ. Perceptions of minimally invasive osteosynthesis: a 2018 survey of orthopedic surgeons. Vet Surg 2020; 49 (Suppl. 01) O163-O170
- 11 Lynch AC, Davies JA. Percutaneous tibial fracture reduction using computed tomography imaging, computer modelling and 3D printed alignment constructs: a cadaveric study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32 (02) 139-148
- 12 Peirone B, Rovesti GL, Baroncelli AB, Piras L. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis fracture reduction techniques in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42 (05) 873-895 , v v
- 13 Guiot LP, Déjardin LM. Prospective evaluation of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in 36 nonarticular tibial fractures in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2011; 40 (02) 171-182
- 14 Puloski S, Romano C, Buckley R, Powell J. Rotational malalignment of the tibia following reamed intramedullary nail fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18 (07) 397-402
- 15 Barnhart M. Pitfalls of minimally invasive fracture repair. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2020; 50 (01) 17-21
- 16 Hasenboehler E, Rikli D, Babst R. Locking compression plate with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in diaphyseal and distal tibial fracture: a retrospective study of 32 patients. Injury 2007; 38 (03) 365-370
- 17 Schmierer PA, Pozzi A. Guidelines for surgical approaches for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2017; 30 (04) 272-278
- 18 Li A, Wei Z, Ding H. et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus conventional fixation techniques for distal tibial fractures: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2017; 38: 52-60
- 19 Schmökel HG, Stein S, Radke H, Hurter K, Schawalder P. Treatment of tibial fractures with plates using minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48 (03) 157-160
- 20 Hespel AM, Wilhite R, Hudson J. Invited review—applications for 3D printers in veterinary medicine. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014; 55 (04) 347-358
- 21 Johnson MD, Lewis DD, Sutton WA. et al. Efficacy of two reduction methods in conjunction with 3-D-printed patient-specific pin guides for aligning simulated comminuted tibial fractures in cadaveric dogs. Am J Vet Res 2022; 83 (09) 0215
- 22 Memarian P, Pishavar E, Zanotti F. et al. Active materials for 3D printing in small animals: current modalities and future directions for orthopedic applications. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23 (03) 1045
- 23 Altwal J, Wilson CH, Griffon DJ. Applications of 3-dimensional printing in small-animal surgery: a review of current practices. Vet Surg 2022; 51 (01) 34-51
- 24 Dozeman ET, Prittie JE, Fischetti AJ. Utilization of whole body computed tomography in polytrauma patients. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2020; 30 (01) 28-33
- 25 Pape HC, Moore EE, McKinley T, Sauaia A. Pathophysiology in patients with polytrauma. Injury 2022; 53 (07) 2400-2412
- 26 Gupta B, Farooque K. Early total care to early appropriate care—what every anesthesiologist must know!. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2023; 39 (01) 3-10
- 27 Volpin G, Pfeifer R, Saveski J, Hasani I, Cohen M, Pape HC. Damage control orthopaedics in polytraumatized patients—current concepts. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 12 (01) 72-82
- 28 Kwon H, Kim KS, Chun YM. et al. Evaluation of a commercial orthopaedic metal artefact reduction tool in radiation therapy of patients with head and neck cancer. Br J Radiol 2015; 88 (1052) 20140536
- 29 Swanson EA, Tomlinson JL, Dismukes DI, Fox DB. Measurement of femoral and tibial joint reference angles and pelvic limb alignment in cats. Vet Surg 2012; 41 (06) 696-704
- 30 Longo F, Nicetto T, Pozzi A, Contiero B, Isola M. A three-dimensional computed tomographic volume rendering methodology to measure the tibial torsion angle in dogs. Vet Surg 2021; 50 (02) 353-364
- 31 Scheuermann LM, Lewis DD, Johnson MD, Biedrzycki AH, Kim SE. Efficacy of virtual surgical planning and a three-dimensional-printed, patient-specific reduction system to facilitate alignment of diaphyseal tibial fractures stabilized by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in dogs: a prospective clinical study. Vet Surg 2024; 53 (06) 1039-1051
- 32 Scheuermann LM, Lewis DD, Johnson MD, Biedrzycki AH, Kim SE. Virtual surgical planning and use of a 3D-printed, patient-specific reduction system for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of diaphyseal tibial fractures in dogs: a historic case control study. Vet Surg 2024; 53 (06) 1052-1061
- 33 Han R, Uneri A, Vijayan RC. et al. Fracture reduction planning and guidance in orthopaedic trauma surgery via multi-body image registration. Med Image Anal 2021; 68: 101917
- 34 Guiot LP, Déjardin LM. Perioperative imaging in minimally invasive osteosynthesis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2020; 50 (01) 49-66
- 35 Palierne S, Blondel M, Swider P, Autefage A. Biomechanical comparison of use of two screws versus three screws per fragment with locking plate constructs under cyclic loading in compression in a fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2022; 35 (03) 166-174
- 36 Prackova I, Paral V, Kyllar M. Safe corridors for external skeletal fixator pin placement in feline long bones. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24 (10) 1008-1016
- 37 Singhvi MS, Zinjarde SS, Gokhale DV. Polylactic acid: synthesis and biomedical applications. J Appl Microbiol 2019; 127 (06) 1612-1626
- 38 Pozzi A, Lewis DD, Scheuermann LM, Castelli E, Longo F. A review of minimally invasive fracture stabilization in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2021; 50 (Suppl. 01) O5-O16
- 39 Chen H, Liu J, Zeng A, Qin N. Analysis of sterilization efficiency and application cost of three low temperature sterilization methods. Rev Sci Instrum 2024; 95 (04) 045112
- 40 Beale B, McCally R. Minimally invasive fracture repair of the tibia and fibula. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2020; 50 (01) 183-206
