Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2025; 85(12): 1288-1290
DOI: 10.1055/a-2721-9792
GebFra Science
Editorial

GDM screening & intervention @ 11 – 13+6 instead of 24 – 28 weeksʼ gestation: time for a change in paradigm?

Article in several languages: English | deutsch

Authors

  • Constantin von Kaisenberg

 

In June 2025 an amendment of the first trimester diagnosis and therapy @ 11 – 13+6 weeks gestation guideline [1] was accepted by the AWMF.

This had become necessary because a trilogy on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), published in “Lancet” in June 2024, had made a fundamental paradigm shift towards the first trimester (LoE 1) [2], [3], [4]. In this issue, you will find a short version of the amendment of chapter 11 of the guideline. A summary of the guideline had been previously published in 2 parts in “Ultraschall in der Medizin” [5], [6].

GDMis a heterogeneous condition that has an incidence of 14% and up to 40% of women [2]. This makes it the most common complication of pregnancy. Thus, GDM is an important topic in fetal medicine.

The previous philosophy assumed that an elevated glucose level in pregnancy is only relevant from the 24 – 28 weeks of pregnancy (LoE 1a) [2], [7].

The new paradigm is that gestational diabetes is a heterogenous condition with foundations for it commencing already before pregnancy. GDM often occurs in early pregnancy and benefits from targeted early treatment. Furthermore, the consequences of gestational diabetes should be considered to follow a life course trajectory [2].

The main adverse outcomes of GDM are macrosomia, neonatal respiratory distress, fetal and maternal injury at birth such as shoulder dystocia, and life-long increased risks for glucose intolerance, obesity, as well as metabolic syndrome and hypertension [2].

The prerequisite to make GDM screening a fourth and major component of first trimester screening @ 11 – 13+6 weeks of gestation is that (I) screening is available which reliably identifies a high risk group with a low false-positive rate, (II) early intervention is feasible and effective and (III) this concept can be realized within the existing resources.

Most of all, however, high quality clinical studies are critically important, which have provided sound robust evidence for the fact that early screening and intervention practically improve outcomes and have a benefit for mothers and their babies [8].

The TOBOGM Trial [9], [10], [11] indicates that women with high glucose levels and early onset GDM, already occurring in the first trimester, may benefit the most from an early screening and intervention. Therefore, the current screening strategy recommends the identification of GDM risk factors to every pregnant woman as an integral part of the first trimester screening @ 11 – 13+6 weeks. If one of them is found, a 75 g oGTT is done. The recommended cutoffs [12] are slightly higher than those of the WHO [13], as TOBOGM suggested overtreatment may result in Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR), when WHO cut-offs are used. Therefore higher cut-offs were chosen @ 11 – 13+6 weeks of gestation than for 24 – 28 weeks of gestation – in order to identify a high risk group [12]. If screening is found to be positive, lifestyle intervention, dietary advice, glucose self-monitoring and – in some cases – insulin therapy are introduced. If self-monitoring shows normal glucose levels, a repeat oGTT @ 24 – 28 weeks can be omitted. If the pregnant woman does not tolerate an oGTT, fasting glucose and HbA1c are measured as surrogate markers. If oGTT is screeningnegative in the first trimester, it has to be repeated @ 24 – 28 weeks of pregnancy.

The current evidence shows that an early screening and intervention halves macrosomia and respiratory distress at birth for these high risk groups.

Early screening and intervention for GDMshould thus be an integral part of first trimester screening @ 11 – 13+6 weeks of pregnancy in German-speaking countries.

Zitierweise für diesen Artikel

Ultraschall in Med 2025; 46: 425 – 427. DOI: 10.1055/a-2679-7511


Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


Correspondence/Korrespondenzadresse

Univ.-Prof. Dr. Constantin von Kaisenberg
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School
Hannover
Germany   

Publication History

Article published online:
03 December 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany