Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang
DOI: 10.1055/a-2719-4944
Research Article: Pediatric

Does Auditory Stimulation Matter? A Single-Subject Design Examining the Active Ingredients Within a Modified Cycles Approach

Authors

  • Nicole Redman

    1   Moravian University, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation Center, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

  • Klaire Brumbaugh 

    1   Moravian University, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation Center, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

  • Kelly Farquharson 

    2   School of Communication Science and Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This investigation compared the effectiveness of the Cycles Approach with and without auditory stimulation. Using an alternating treatment design (AATD), three preschool-aged children with severe phonological disorders received a modified Cycles Approach targeting two phonological patterns. Effectiveness was measured by the percentage of occurrence of errors. Treatment outcomes were analyzed across experimental conditions and participants with respect to the effectiveness of the Cycles Approach, modified by including and excluding auditory stimulation. All participants demonstrated improvements in speech sound production skills when auditory stimulation was withheld. Two participants demonstrated a statistically significant change in speech intelligibility from baseline to intervention regardless of auditory stimulation inclusion. One participant experienced a statistically significant difference in speech intelligibility when auditory stimulation was withheld. Parents of all participants indicated improvements in their child's speech intelligibility on a posttreatment questionnaire. This investigation substantiates prior research suggesting that a modified Cycles Approach is an effective intervention to treat preschool children with phonological disorders. For the three participants in this study, implementing auditory stimulation techniques did not improve or expedite speech intelligibility outcomes, and for one participant, improved clinical outcomes were achieved without the use of auditory stimulation.

Keywords

speech sound disorder - preschool - Cycles Approach - auditory stimulation - intervention


Publication History

Received: 13 February 2025

Accepted: 08 October 2025

Article published online:
18 December 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • Almost, D., & Rosenbaum, P. (1998). Effectiveness of speech intervention for phonological disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 40, 319–325
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-a). Speech Sound Disorders: Articulation and Phonology. (Practice Portal). Accessed June 13, 2021 at: www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Articulation-and-Phonology/
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-b). Childhood Hearing Screening. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Accessed February 22, 2022 at: https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/professional-issues/childhood-hearing-screening/-collapse_1
  • Alresheed, F., Hott, B. L., & Bano, C. (2013). Single subject research: A synthesis of analytic methods. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 2(1). Advance online publication
  • Baker, E., & McLeod, S. (2011). Evidence-based practice for children with speech sound disorders: Part 1 narrative review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(2), 102–139
  • Baker, E., Williams, A. L., McLeod, S., & McCauley, R. (2018). Elements of phonological interventions for children with speech sound disorders: The development of a taxonomy. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3), 906–935
  • Benway, N. R., Garcia, K., Hitchcock, E., McAllister, T., Leece, M. C., Wang, Q., & Preston, J. L. (2021). Associations between speech perception, vocabulary, and phonological awareness skill in school-aged children with speech sound disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(2), 452–463
  • Broen, P. A., Strange, W., Doyle, S. S., & Heller, J. H. (1983). Perception and production of approximant consonants by normal and articulation-delayed preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26(4), 601–608
  • Brosseau-Lapré, F., & Schumaker, J. (2020). Perception of correctly and incorrectly produced words in children with and without phonological speech sound disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(12), 3961–3973
  • Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219–252
  • Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49(3–4), 155–180
  • Brumbaugh, K. M., & Smit, A. B. (2013). Treating children ages 3-6 who have speech sound disorder: A survey. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44(3), 306–319
  • Cabbage, K. L. (2015). The role of speech perception in persistent speech sound disorder. Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 16(2), 18–24
  • Cabbage, K. L., & DeVeney, S. L. (2020). Treatment approach considerations for children with speech sound disorders in school-based settings. Topics in Language Disorders, 40(4), 312–325
  • Cabbage, K., Farquharson, K., & DeVeney, S. (2022). Speech sound disorder treatment approaches used by school-based clinicians: An application of the experience sampling method. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 53(3), 860–873
  • Cabbage, K. L., & Hitchcock, E. R. (2022). Clinical considerations for speech perception in school-age children with speech sound disorders: A review of the current literature. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 53(3), 768–785
  • Cabbage, K. L., Hogan, T. P., & Carrell, T. D. (2016). Speech perception differences in children with dyslexia and persistent speech delay. Speech Communication, 82, 14–25
  • Cabbage, K. L., Farquharson, K., Kelman, M. E., & Schreiber, L. (2024). Acquisition of speech sounds and phonological patterns. In Hodson, B. (2024). Evaluating and Enhancing Children's Phonological Systems (3rd Ed., pp. 21–38). PhonoComp Publishing, Wichita, KS
  • Crosbie, S., Holm, A., & Dodd, B. (2005). Intervention for children with severe speech disorder: A comparison of two approaches. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 40(4), 467–491
  • De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21
  • DeVeney, S. L., Cabbage, K., & Mourey, T. (2020). Target selection consideration for speech sound disorder intervention in schools. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(6), 1722–1734. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_persp-20-00138
  • Farquharson, K. (2019). It might not be "just artic": The case for the single sound error. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 4(1), 76–84
  • Farquharson, K., Cabbage, K. L., & Gillon, G. T. (2024). Phonological awareness and orthographic knowledge in children with speech sound disorders. In Hodson, B. (2024). Evaluating and Enhancing Children's Phonological Systems (3rd Ed., pp. 21–38). PhonoComp Publishing, Wichita, KS
  • Furlong, L. M., Morris, M. E., Serry, T. A., & Erickson, S. (2021). Treating childhood speech sound disorders: Current approaches to management by Australian speech-language pathologists. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(2), 581–596
  • Gierut, J. A. (1999). Syllable onsets: Clusters and adjuncts in acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(3), 708–726
  • Gillon, G. T. (2000). The efficacy of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(2), 126–141
  • Gillon, G. T. (2005). Facilitating phoneme awareness development in 3- and 4-year-old children with speech impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(4), 308–324
  • Grunwell, P. (1975). The phonological analysis of articulation disorders. The British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 10(1), 31–42
  • Grunwell, P. (1987). Clinical Phonology (2nd Ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins
  • Hassink, J. M., & Wendt, O. (2010). Remediation of phonological disorders in preschool age children: Evidence for the cycles approach. EBP Briefs, 5(2), 1–7
  • Hearnshaw, S., Baker, E., & Munro, N. (2019). Speech perception skills of children with speech sound disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(10), 3771-3789. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-18-0519
  • Hitchcock, E. R., Cabbage, K. L., Swartz, M. T., & Carrell, T. D. (2020). Measuring speech perception using the wide-range acoustic accuracy scale: Preliminary findings. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(4), 1098–1112
  • Hitchcock, E. R., Harel, D., & Byun, T. M. (2015). Social, emotional, and academic impact of residual speech errors in school-aged children: A survey study. Seminars in Speech and Language, 36(4), 283–294
  • Hodson, B. W. (2004). Hodson Assessment of Phonological Patterns – Third Edition: Technical Manual. PRO-ED
  • Hodson, B. W. (2010). Evaluating and enhancing children's phonological systems: Research and theory to practice. PhonoComp Publishing
  • Hodson, B. W. (2011). Enhancing phonological patterns of young children with highly unintelligible speech. ASHA Leader, 16(4), 16–19
  • Hodson, B. (2024). Evaluating and enhancing children’s phonological systems (3rd Ed.) PhonoComp Publishing, Wichita, KS
  • Hodson, B. W., & Paden, E. P. (1991). Targeting intelligible speech: A phonological approach to remediation. Pro-Ed
  • Johnson, E. P., Pennington, B. F., Lowenstein, J. H., & Nittrouer, S. (2011). Sensitivity to structure in the speech signal by children with speech sound disorder and reading disability. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44(3), 294–314
  • Justice, L. M., Logan, J., Jiang, H., & Schmitt, M. B. (2017). Algorithm-driven dosage decisions (AD 3): Optimizing treatment for children with language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(1), 57–68
  • Justice, L. M., Logan, J., Schmitt, M. B., & Jiang, H. (2016). Designing effective speech-language interventions for children in the public schools: Leverage the spacing effect. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 85–91
  • Kamhi, A. G. (2006). Treatment decisions for children with speech-sound disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37(4), 271–279
  • Krueger, B. I. (2019). Eligibility and speech sound disorders: Assessment of social impact. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 4(1), 85–90
  • Ledford, R. J., & Gast, D. L. (2018). Single Case Research Methodology: Applications in Special Education and Behavioral Sciences-3rd Edition. Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group
  • Leonard, L. B., Camarata, S. M., Brown, B., & Camarata, M. N. (2004). Tense and agreement in the speech of children with specific language impairment: Patterns of generalization through intervention. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1363–1379
  • Locke, J. L. (1980a). The inference of speech perception in the phonologically disordered child. Part I: A rationale, some criteria, the conventional tests. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45(4), 431–444
  • Locke, J. L. (1980b). The inference of speech perception in the phonologically disordered child. Part II: Some clinically novel procedures. Their use, some findings. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45(4), 445–468
  • Lof, G. L., & Synan, S. T. (1997). Is there a speech discrimination/perception link to disordered articulation and phonology? A review of 80 years of literature. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 24, 57–71
  • McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & McCormack, J. (2012). The Intelligibility in Context Scale: Validity and reliability of a subjective rating measure. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 648–656
  • Miccio, A. W., Elbert, M., & Forrest, K. (1999). The relationship between stimulability and phonological acquisition in children with normally developing and disordered phonologies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8(4), 347–363
  • Michalek, A. M., Raver, S. A., Richels, C., Murphy, K. A., & Alshammari, R. (2019). Using focused recasting and auditory bombardment to teach child-specific morphosyntactical skills to preschoolers who are deaf or hard of hearing. Deafness & Education International, 23(1), 43–63
  • Montgomery, J. K., & Bonderman, I. R. (1989). Serving preschool children with severe phonological disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 20(1), 76–84
  • Olszewski, A., & Rae, K. (2021). Measuring stakeholder perceptions: A review of social validity reporting in ASHA Journals. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(3), 1247–1260
  • Plante, E., Tucci, A., Nicholas, K., Arizmendi, G. D., & Vance, R. (2018). Effective use of auditory bombardment as a therapy adjunct for children with developmental language disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(2), 320–333
  • Portney, L. G. (2020). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (4th ed.). F.A. Davis Co
  • Powell, T. W., & Miccio, A. W. (1996). Stimulability: A useful clinical tool. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29(4), 237–253
  • Preston, J.L., Irwin, J., & Turcios, J. (2015). Perception of speech sounds in school-aged children with speech sound disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 36(4), 224–233
  • Prezas, R. F., Magnus, L. C., & Hodson, B. W. (2021). The Cycles Approach. In A.L. Williams, S. McLeod, & R.J. McCauley (Eds.), Interventions for speech sound disorders in children, Second Edition (pp. 251–278). Brookes Publishing
  • Redman, N., Brumbaugh, K., & Farquharson, K. (2025, January 29). Auditory bombardment and the cycles approach
  • Rudolph, J. M., & Wendt, O. (2014). The efficacy of the cycles approach: A multiple baseline design. Journal of Communication Disorders, 47, 1–16
  • Rvachew, S. (1994). Speech perception training can facilitate sound production learning. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37(2), 347–357
  • Rvachew, S., & Brosseau-Lapré, F. (2012). An input-focused intervention for children with developmental phonological disorders. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 19(1), 31–35
  • Rvachew, S., Rafaat, S., & Martin, M. (1999). Stimulability, speech perception skills, and the treatment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8(1), 33–43
  • Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single–subject research. Behavior Modification, 22(3), 221–242
  • Sutherland, D., & Gillon, G. T. (2007). Development of phonological representations and phonological awareness in children with speech impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42(2), 229–250
  • Tambyraja, S. R., Farquharson, K., & Justice, L. (2020). Reading risk in children with speech sound disorder: Prevalence, persistence, and predictors. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(11), 3714–3726
  • Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Shadish, W., Vohra, S., Barlow, D. H., Horner, R., Kazdin, A., Kratochwill, T., McDonald, S., Sampson, M., Shamseer, L., Togher, L., Albin, R., Backman, C., Douglas, J., Evans, J. J., Gast, D., Manolov, R., . . . Wilson, B. (2016). The single-case reporting guideline in behavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 96, e1–e10
  • Tyler, A. A., Edwards, M. L., & Saxman, J. H. (1987). Clinical application of two phonologically based treatment procedures. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52(4), 393–409
  • Tyler, A. A., & Macrae, T. (2010). Stimulability: Relationships to other characteristics of children's phonological systems. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24(4–5), 300–310
  • Tyler, A. A., & Watterson, K. H. (1991). Effects of phonological versus language intervention in preschoolers with both phonological and language impairment. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 7(2), 141–160
  • Van Riper, C. (1972). Speech correction: Principles and methods. Prentice-Hall
  • Van Riper, C., & Erickson, R. L. (1996). Speech correction: An introduction to speech pathology and audiology. Allyn and Bacon
  • Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Weiner, F. (1981). Treatment of phonological disability using the method of meaningful minimal contrast: Two case studies. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46(1), 97–103
  • Williams, A.V. (2020). Pocketalker ultra manual and users guide. Eden Prairie, MN
  • Williams, G. C., & McReynolds, L. V. (1975). The relationship between discrimination and articulation training in children with misarticulations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18(3), 401–412