Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2674-3914
AI-driven Technologies for Wrist Fracture Prediction: A Narrative Review of Emerging Approaches
Funding None.

Abstract
Wrist fractures account for approximately 18% of all fractures and are especially common in older adults with osteoporosis and in younger patients following high-energy trauma. Predicting healing outcomes in these cases remains clinically challenging due to variability in fracture types, patient-specific factors, and treatment pathways. Although artificial intelligence (AI) systems have already demonstrated diagnostic accuracies exceeding 95% in detecting and classifying wrist fractures on radiographs, their use in prognostic modeling is still emerging.
This narrative review examines recent developments in AI-driven approaches aimed at improving clinical prognosis following wrist fractures. Advanced models—such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), transformers, and hybrid architectures—can identify subtle imaging and clinical features associated with complications like malunion, delayed healing, or nonunion. The integration of multimodal data, including comorbidities, imaging, and even osteogenomic profiles, shows promise in enhancing risk stratification and guiding more personalized follow-up strategies.
Emerging technologies such as explainable AI, synthetic data generation, and federated learning offer potential solutions to challenges related to data availability, interpretability, and model generalization across care settings. Despite encouraging results, further validation in real-world clinical environments and standardization of outcome definitions are needed.
In summary, AI-based prognostic tools for wrist fractures could support orthopedic decision-making by identifying high-risk patients early, tailoring follow-up protocols, and improving long-term outcomes through more individualized care.
Keywords
artificial intelligence - wrist fractures - predictive modeling - deep learning - multimodal dataAuthors' Contributions
All listed authors meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship. Each author contributed substantially to the conception, research, drafting, and final review of the manuscript. No writing assistance was used.
Ethical Approval
This is a narrative review article and does not involve original research with human or animal subjects. The authors have adhered to the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). All sources have been appropriately cited to ensure academic integrity and transparency. This manuscript is original, has not been published previously, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Publication History
Received: 20 May 2025
Accepted: 31 July 2025
Article published online:
20 August 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Bajwa J, Munir U, Nori A, Williams B. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine. Future Healthc J 2021; 8 (02) e188-e194
- 2 Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N. et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ 2023; 23 (01) 689
- 3 Farhadi F, Barnes MR, Sugito HR, Sin JM, Henderson ER, Levy JJ. Applications of artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery. Front Med Technol 2022; 4: 995526
- 4 Hansen V, Jensen J, Kusk MW, Gerke O, Tromborg HB, Lysdahlgaard S. Deep learning performance compared to healthcare experts in detecting wrist fractures from radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2024; 174: 111399
- 5 Jacques T, Cardot N, Ventre J, Demondion X, Cotten A. Commercially-available AI algorithm improves radiologists' sensitivity for wrist and hand fracture detection on X-ray, compared to a CT-based ground truth. Eur Radiol 2024; 34 (05) 2885-2894
- 6 Breu R, Avelar C, Bertalan Z. et al. Artificial intelligence in traumatology. Bone Joint Res 2024; 13 (10) 588-595
- 7 Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin 2012; 28 (02) 113-125
- 8 Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 2006; 37 (08) 691-697
- 9 Corrales LA, Morshed S, Bhandari M, Miclau III T. Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (09) 1862-1868
- 10 Oude Nijhuis KD, Dankelman LHM, Wiersma JP. et al; Machine Learning Consortium. AI for detection, classification and prediction of loss of alignment of distal radius fractures; a systematic review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024; 50 (06) 2819-2831
- 11 Walenkamp MMJ, Aydin S, Mulders MAM, Goslings JC, Schep NWL. Predictors of unstable distal radius fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41 (05) 501-515
- 12 Link TM, Pedoia V. Using AI to improve radiographic fracture detection. Radiology 2022; 302 (03) 637-638
- 13 Bousson V, Attané G, Benoist N. et al. Artificial intelligence for detecting acute fractures in patients admitted to an emergency department: real-life performance of three commercial algorithms. Acad Radiol 2023; 30 (10) 2118-2139
- 14 Guermazi A, Tannoury C, Kompel AJ. et al. Improving radiographic fracture recognition performance and efficiency using artificial intelligence. Radiology 2022; 302 (03) 627-636
- 15 Hornung AL, Rudisill SS, Smith S, Streepy JT, Simcock XC. Can machine learning identify patients who are appropriate for outpatient open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures?. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2024; 6 (06) 808-813
- 16 Najjar R. Redefining radiology: a review of artificial intelligence integration in medical imaging. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13 (17) 2760
- 17 Waldman SA, Terzic A. Health care evolves from reactive to proactive. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2019; 105 (01) 10-13
- 18 Alzubaidi L, Al-Dulaimi K, Salhi A. et al. Comprehensive review of deep learning in orthopaedics: applications, challenges, trustworthiness, and fusion. Artif Intell Med 2024; 155: 102935
- 19 Yamashita R, Nishio M, Do RKG, Togashi K. Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology. Insights Imaging 2018; 9 (04) 611-629
- 20 Kim MW, Jung J, Park SJ. et al. Application of convolutional neural networks for distal radio-ulnar fracture detection on plain radiographs in the emergency room. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2021; 8 (02) 120-127
- 21 Raisuddin AM, Vaattovaara E, Nevalainen M. et al. Critical evaluation of deep neural networks for wrist fracture detection. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 6006
- 22 Lao S, Gong Y, Shi S. et al. Attentions Help CNNs See Better: Attention-based Hybrid Image Quality Assessment Network. In: 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW). IEEE; 2022: 1139-1148
- 23 Aldhyani T, Ahmed ZAT, Alsharbi BM. et al. Diagnosis and detection of bone fracture in radiographic images using deep learning approaches. Front Med (Lausanne) 2025; 11: 1506686
- 24 Ju RY, Cai W. Fracture detection in pediatric wrist trauma X-ray images using YOLOv8 algorithm. Sci Rep 2023; 13 (01) 20077
- 25 Islam S, Elmekki H, Elsebai A. et al. A comprehensive survey on applications of transformers for deep learning tasks. Expert Syst Appl 2024; 241: 122666
- 26 Zhu Z, Chen Q, Yu L. et al. Cross-view deformable transformer for non-displaced hip fracture classification from frontal-lateral X-ray pair. In: Greenspan H, Madabhushi A, Mousavi P. et al, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2023. Vol 14225. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2023: 444-453
- 27 Zech JR, Carotenuto G, Igbinoba Z. et al. Detecting pediatric wrist fractures using deep-learning-based object detection. Pediatr Radiol 2023; 53 (06) 1125-1134
- 28 Bragazzi NL, Garbarino S. Toward clinical generative AI: conceptual framework. JMIR AI 2024; 3: e55957
- 29 Alzubaidi L, Zhang J, Humaidi AJ. et al. Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions. J Big Data 2021; 8 (01) 53
- 30 Dipnall JF, Page R, Du L. et al. Predicting fracture outcomes from clinical registry data using artificial intelligence supplemented models for evidence-informed treatment (PRAISE) study protocol. PLoS One 2021; 16 (09) e0257361
- 31 Wei W, Huang Y, Zheng J. et al. YOLOv11-based multi-task learning for enhanced bone fracture detection and classification in X-ray images. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences 2025; 18 (01) 101309
- 32 Ho-Le TP, Tran HTT, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen HT, Nguyen TV. Assessing the clinical utility of genetic profiling in fracture risk prediction: a decision curve analysis. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32 (02) 271-280
- 33 Zhao C, Keyak JH, Cao X. et al. Multi-view information fusion using multi-view variational autoencoder to predict proximal femoral fracture load. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14: 1261088
- 34 McKinley TO, Gaski GE, Billiar TR. et al; METRC. Patient-Specific Precision Injury Signatures to Optimize Orthopaedic Interventions in Multiply Injured Patients (PRECISE STUDY). J Orthop Trauma 2022; 36 (1, Suppl 1): S14-S20
- 35 Shehzadi T, Hashmi KA, Stricker D, Afzal MZ. Object detection with transformers: a review. Published online July 10, 2023
- 36 Kang SJ, Kim MJ, Hur YI, Haam JH, Kim YS. Application of machine learning algorithms to predict osteoporotic fractures in women. Korean J Fam Med 2024; 45 (03) 144-148
- 37 Lin C, Liang Z, Liu J, Sun W. A machine learning-based prediction model pre-operatively for functional recovery after 1-year of hip fracture surgery in older people. Front Surg 2023; 10: 1160085
- 38 Takahashi S, Terai H, Hoshino M. et al. Machine-learning-based approach for nonunion prediction following osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Eur Spine J 2023; 32 (11) 3788-3796
- 39 Fratello M, Tagliaferri R. Decision trees and random forests. In: Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology. Elsevier; 2019: 374-383
- 40 Mohammed H, Huang Y, Memtsoudis S, Parks M, Huang Y, Ma Y. Utilization of machine learning methods for predicting surgical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. PLoS One 2022; 17 (03) e0263897
- 41 Saleem SM, Jan SS. Integrating machine learning for personalized fracture risk assessment: a multimodal approach. Korean J Fam Med 2024; 45 (06) 356-358
- 42 Badgeley MA, Zech JR, Oakden-Rayner L. et al. Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2: 31
- 43 Qoku A, Katsaouni N, Flinner N, Buettner F, Schulz MH. Multimodal analysis methods in predictive biomedicine. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023; 21: 5829-5838
- 44 Bozzo A, Tsui JMG, Bhatnagar S, Forsberg J. Deep learning and multimodal artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32 (11) e523-e532
- 45 Dipaola F, Gatti M, Giaj Levra A. et al. Multimodal deep learning for COVID-19 prognosis prediction in the emergency department: a bi-centric study. Sci Rep 2023; 13 (01) 10868
- 46 Kim Y, Kim YG, Park JW. et al. A CT-based deep learning model for predicting subsequent fracture risk in patients with hip fracture. Radiology 2024; 310 (01) e230614
- 47 Lalehzarian SP, Gowd AK, Liu JN. Machine learning in orthopaedic surgery. World J Orthop 2021; 12 (09) 685-699
- 48 Liang S, Zhang Y. A simple general approach to balance task difficulty in multi-task learning. Published online February 12, 2020
- 49 Zaman A, Park SH, Bang H, Park CW, Park I, Joung S. Generative approach for data augmentation for deep learning-based bone surface segmentation from ultrasound images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2020; 15 (06) 931-941
- 50 Rahman R, Yagi N, Hayashi K, Maruo A, Muratsu H, Kobashi S. Enhancing fracture diagnosis in pelvic X-rays by deep convolutional neural network with synthesized images from 3D-CT. Sci Rep 2024; 14 (01) 8004
- 51 Giuffrè M, Shung DL. Harnessing the power of synthetic data in healthcare: innovation, application, and privacy. NPJ Digit Med 2023; 6 (01) 186
- 52 Greenberg JK, Landman JM, Kelly MP. et al. Leveraging artificial intelligence and synthetic data derivatives for spine surgery research. Global Spine J 2023; 13 (08) 2409-2421
- 53 Arora A, Arora A. Generative adversarial networks and synthetic patient data: current challenges and future perspectives. Future Healthc J 2022; 9 (02) 190-193
- 54 Tang D, Chen J, Ren L, Wang X, Li D, Zhang H. Reviewing CAM-based deep explainable methods in healthcare. Appl Sci (Basel) 2024; 14 (10) 4124
- 55 Naik N, Hameed BMZ, Shetty DK. et al. Legal and ethical consideration in artificial intelligence in healthcare: who takes responsibility?. Front Surg 2022; 9: 862322
- 56 Gilbert A, Pizzolla E, Palmieri S, Briganti G. Artificial intelligence in healthcare and regulation challenges: a mini guide for (mental) health professionals. Psychiatr Danub 2024; 36 (Suppl. 02) 348-353
- 57 Liu Y, Yu W, Dillon T. Regulatory responses and approval status of artificial intelligence medical devices with a focus on China. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7 (01) 255
- 58 Fraser AG, Biasin E, Bijnens B. et al. Artificial intelligence in medical device software and high-risk medical devices—a review of definitions, expert recommendations and regulatory initiatives. Expert Rev Med Devices 2023; 20 (06) 467-491
- 59 Mennella C, Maniscalco U, De Pietro G, Esposito M. Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: a narrative review. Heliyon 2024; 10 (04) e26297