Rofo
DOI: 10.1055/a-2578-1363
Review

Long/Post-Covid – An Interdisciplinary Challenge

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Emil C. Reisinger
1   Dept. of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39071)
,
Hilte Geerdes-Fenge
1   Dept. of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39071)
,
Christine Wossidlo
1   Dept. of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39071)
,
Hanka Arndt
2   Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39071)
› Author Affiliations

Supported by: Landesregierung Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
 

Abstract

Background

In this overview we summarize the current state of scientific knowledge on the epidemiology, etiology, clinical symptoms and therapy of post-COVID disease.

Methods

The study is based on a search of the scientific literature available on PubMed and on our own clinical experience in the post-COVID outpatient clinic.

Conclusion

The prevalence of post-COVID disease varies greatly depending on the survey method used. The symptoms of post-COVID are manifold, but fatigue, cardiopulmonary complaints, cognitive deficit, and pain syndromes are prominent. There are currently no surefire symptoms or specific markers that prove the presence of the disease. Therefore, diagnosis is often based on an exclusion of other diagnoses, which requires good interdisciplinary cooperation. Therapy for post-COVID disease is also not specific but is always individual and symptom-oriented. There have been various attempts to explain the pathogenesis of post-COVID, but the mechanisms behind the development of the condition have not yet been conclusively clarified. Persistence of the virus or of viral proteins may cause protracted infection or autoimmunity. Infection and inflammation of the endothelium of the small vessels and the hypercoagulation associated with this may lead to local cytokine dysregulation and organ damage. Further clarification of the pathogenesis of post-COVID and the establishment of effective diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches are urgently needed.

Key Points

  • Post-COVID is a commonly reported condition with variable symptoms

  • Interdisciplinary exclusion of other diagnoses and therapy planning are important

  • Clarification of pathogenesis and establishment of diagnostic markers are urgently needed

Citation Format

  • Reisinger EC, Geerdes-Fenge H, Wossidlo C et al. Long/Post-Covid – An Interdisciplinary Challenge. Rofo 2025; DOI 10.1055/a-2578-1363


#

Radiology provided initial information about the pathogenesis of long COVID and post-COVID disease. In the spring of 2020, shortly after the start of the pandemic, there were numerous reports around the world of pulmonary artery embolisms (PAE), thereby providing initial information about coagulation defects as a consequence of COVID-19 disease [1] [2]. Deep vein thrombosis, venous thromboembolisms, and pulmonary embolisms were frequently observed. Endotheliitis with microthrombi in various organs, e.g., in the heart or the kidney, was described in histological reports [3].

Long COVID and post-COVID are defined differently by the various international expert committees. The British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) defines long COVID as new or ongoing symptoms that last four weeks or more after the acute phase of a SARS-Cov-2 infection [4]. Symptoms lasting more than 12 weeks after the onset of a SARS-CoV-2 infection that cannot be otherwise explained are described as post-COVID syndrome [5]. The German S1 guidelines “Long/Post-COVID” also use this time frame, but the main focus is on post-COVID syndrome [6]. This article uses the more comprehensive term post-COVID.

The frequency of post-COVID is 2–89% in the literature with reports ranging from systematic studies to self-reported patient symptoms [7] [8]. Based on the ICD-10 diagnosis code for “Post-COVID-19 condition” (PCC), the frequency was 2% in a Swedish cohort study [9].

A causality of post-COVID currently cannot be proven. Diagnosis is often based on exclusion. Post-COVID syndrome includes symptom complexes resulting from a COVID-19 infection, or diseases occurring at the same time as or after a COVID-19 infection, or preexisting conditions that may have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 infection. These cases should be differentiated from patients treated for a COVID-19 infection in the ICU experiencing persistent symptoms solely due to their hospitalization in the ICU [10].

The symptoms of post-COVID are diverse, but there are some typical symptoms that indicate the diagnosis. Four main symptoms (clinical phenotype cluster) have been identified: Fatigue, cardiopulmonary symptoms like dyspnea and tachycardia, cognitive impairment, and pain. Other symptoms are typically grouped around these four main symptoms. Many patients report post-exertional malaise (PEM) and persistent loss of smell and taste [11] [12] [13]. The more frequently COVID-19 is contracted, the greater the disease burden in terms of hospitalizations, symptoms, and secondary diseases [14].

Post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS) with similar symptoms to those described in post-COVID are also seen after other viral diseases. For example, fatigue, neurocognitive impairment, and pain have also been reported in the case of post-Ebola, post-Dengue, post-EBV, and post-Polio. The symptoms last months to years with the number and severity of symptoms decreasing significantly over 1–2 years. In light of the similarity in symptoms, the possibility of similar pathomechanisms among PAISs should be considered [15] [16].

Various attempts have been made to explain the pathogenesis of post-COVID. One controversial hypothesis discusses the role of the persistence of SARS CoV-2 or other viruses (e.g., EBV) or their virus proteins, which can result in protracted infections and possibly autoimmunity. Endotheliitis and hypercoagulation could result in local cytokine dysregulation and organ damage [17]. Dysbiosis in the microbiome of the bowel with an increase in diverse bacteria (e.g., ruminococcus among others) has also been discussed by some authors [18].

Endothelial infection and microthrombi result in the activation of coagulation factors and cytokines (Von Willebrand factor, ICAM1, ADAM TS13, etc.) and activation of a pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine cascade, causing inflammation and tissue damage around the vessels [19].

Other neurotransmitters are then responsible for organ-specific damage in individual organs. For example, eotaxin (CCL-11), which is elevated in various neurological diseases like in cognitive impairment and neurodegeneration, is produced in the brain by microglia [20]. Secondary damage can occur in the lung due to thromboembolisms or the development of pulmonary fibrosis [21].

Antibodies ranging from ACE-receptor-specific antibodies to prothrombotic anti-phospholipid antibodies can also play a role as a tissue damage trigger [17]. An interesting hypothesis is the formation of neoantigens when virus proteins bind with the body’s own proteins resulting in a new immunologically active protein. These antibodies then attack the body’s own structures. This could play a role in SARS-induced diabetes [22].

Both treatment with the antiviral drug Paxlovid and COVID-19 vaccination can significantly reduce the risk of COVID-19 infections and thus post-COVID [23].

An evaluation of post-COVID condition (PCC) coded as ICD-10 (U09.9) in a Swedish cohort study including 649,071 patients showed a reduction in post-COVID of 21% after one vaccination, 59% after two vaccinations, and 73% after three vaccinations [9]. This reduction has been confirmed by numerous other studies [24].

Various risk factors for post-COVID are being discussed. Female sex, more than five early symptoms, early onset of dyspnea, and prior psychiatric diseases seem to be favorable conditions for the development of post-COVID [25]. The typical sex distribution was also seen in our post-COVID clinic at the university hospital: 72% female, 28% male. The percentage of girls in a study on post-COVID in children was 56% [26].

A specific diagnosis of post-COVID disease is currently not possible since there are no specific markers indicating the disease. Therefore, the diagnosis is often based on exclusion, which requires good interdisciplinary collaboration. [Table 1] shows a summary of organ-related diagnostic techniques in relation to post-COVID-associated symptoms and complications.

Table 1 Various organ systems that can be affected by post-COVID-19 and diagnostic methods for detecting complications (table based on data from [27]).

Affected organ system

Diagnostic methods

Pulmonary

X-ray of the thorax, high-resolution CT (HRCT), CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), pulmonary function tests

Cardiovascular

Electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiogram (ECHO), cardiac MRI, biomarkers (troponin, NT-proBNP), stress echo

Renal (kidneys)

Serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal ultrasound, biomarkers for acute kidney injury (AKI), and chronic kidney disease (CKD)

Neurological

Brain MRI, EEG (in case of seizure), neurocognitive tests for memory and attention disorders

Angiological (thrombosis)

D-dimer testing, Doppler ultrasound for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), angio CT for pulmonary embolism, antiphospholipid testing

Gastrointestinal (liver)

Liver function tests, abdominal ultrasound, CT/MRI of the liver

Endocrine (diabetes)

Blood sugar testing, HbA1c, insulin level testing

Musculoskeletal

X-ray, MRI for joint/muscle pain, bone density measurement (for osteoporosis)

As an example of lung imaging, [Fig. 1] shows rapid formation of pronounced post-COVID-associated pulmonary fibrosis with severe dyspnea in a 60-year-old patient after COVID pneumonia seen on primary imaging.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 60-year-old patient; a CT examination with a slice thickness of 3 mm was performed as initial diagnostic imaging due to suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. For further evaluation of post-pneumonia interstitial parenchymal changes, a high-resolution CT examination with a slice thickness of 1 mm was performed. a Chest CT without contrast (slice thickness: 3 mm) showing bilateral partially arcade-like ground-glass infiltrates, located primarily peripheral/subpleural and in the lower field. b 4 weeks later, chest CT with contrast (slice thickness: 1 mm) in the case of severe dyspnea; significant subpleural reticulations and traction bronchiectasis now visible in the areas of formerly present ground-glass infiltrates; thickened interlobular septa also visible in the case of persistent interstitial infiltrates.

[Fig. 2] shows CT images of a 76-year-old patient with COVID pneumonia and the development of mild fibrosis over the course of the disease.

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 76-year-old patient with COVID-19 pneumonia and mild fibrosis on follow-up: a Chest CT with contrast (slice thickness: 1 mm) as initial imaging showing bilateral consolidated infiltrates with a peripheral and arcade-like configuration. b Initial follow-up chest CT without contrast (slice thickness: 1 mm) after 2 months showing regression of the consolidations. Persistent ground-glass opacities with subpleural and parapleural reticulations. c Chest CT with contrast (slice thickness: 1 mm) 6 months after initial imaging in the case of persistent dyspnea. Further regression of changes, only fine bands of subpleural reticulations with isolated adjacent areas of traction bronchiectasis are still visible.

As an example of cardiac imaging, [Fig. 3] shows COVID-19-associated acute myocarditis in a 36-year-old patient with visible scarring on the 9-month follow-up MRI scan.

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 36-year-old patient with myocarditis after COVID infection: 1.5 Tesla MRI, short-axis sequences with two-chamber view; a T2-TIRM sequence showing edema of the myocardium from the midventricular to the distal third of the left ventricle in the inferoseptal segment (thin arrow) 14 days after positive PCR test. b Follow-up MRI examination after 9 months showing intramural scarring at the junction from the midventricular to the distal third of the left ventricle in the inferoseptal segment (thick arrow) in the PSMDE sequence.

[Fig. 4] shows the practical diagnostic approach.

Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Primary care/general medicine approach in accordance with the S1 guidelines of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany regarding post-COVID/long COVID.

During the corona virus pandemic, the RACOON project (Radiological Cooperative Network) was initiated by the German Radiological Society and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research to improve the networking of radiology databases. All university radiology departments in Germany are included in this cooperative project. Research institutes outside the university setting are also included in the list of network partners. This network makes it possible to conduct large multicenter studies and detailed image analyses so that the effects of COVID-19 on the lungs and other organs can be systematically evaluated even in later disease stages.

To determine the severity of post-COVID disease, a classification system allowing objective and comprehensive description of post-COVID symptoms, known as the Post-COVID-Syndrome Score (PCS Score) was developed as part of the NAPKON-POP cohort study COVIDOM [28].

Primary care is the starting point for the diagnosis and treatment of the diverse post-COVID symptoms. If further workup or treatment is needed, patients can be referred to the post-COVID outpatient clinics that have been established at many centers. Additional disciplines should be included in a coordinated manner.

The treatment of post-COVID disease is always individualized and symptom-based, in accordance with the S1 guidelines of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany [6]. In the case of fatigue and respiratory symptoms, pacing strategies as well as relaxation and breathing exercises have proven helpful. Mild cognitive impairment can be treated with ergotherapy and cognitive performance therapy, possibly using a digital app. In the case of a loss of smell, olfactory training with defined scents is available. Pain is treated in accordance with the S1 guidelines “Chronic non-cancer pain” [29]. Medical rehabilitation under consideration of the individual capabilities is often useful [30] [31].

Informing patients of the pathophysiological connections can improve understanding among patients and reduce symptoms.

More than 450 clinical trials studying immunoadsorption, immunosuppression, and COVID-19 vaccinations and drugs can be found on the platform ClinicalTrials.gov (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov). The effect of all of these therapeutic measures against post-COVID has not yet been proven. The use of medications being tested for post-COVID outside of clinical studies is considered “off label” use. These medications can only be prescribed on an individual basis and should not be advertised.

Mecklenburg-Vorpommern approved research funding for the creation of outpatient clinics for cross-sector networking, treatment research, and basic research. Post-COVID outpatient clinics were able to be successfully established at the two university sites and multiple research projects were able to be initiated. Many national and international projects on long COVID and post-COVID have been conducted in recent years thanks to funding from the German Research Society, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, the Federal Joint Committee, and the EU. A funding announcement was also published by the Federal Ministry of Health in March 2024 to improve the care of those patients affected by post-COVID in Germany.

In summary, post-COVID is a heterogeneous disease and its causality is very difficult to prove. The frequency of post-COVID varies greatly depending on the type of data collection and is expected to decrease if herd immunity is maintained through infection and vaccination. The most common symptoms are fatigue, dyspnea, cognitive dysfunction, and pain. These can currently be treated on a symptomatic basis. Since the disease must be treated in an interdisciplinary manner, effective cross-discipline patient care is essential.

At present, the pathogenesis can most likely be attributed to endothelial damage and autoimmunity. Clinical and experimental research approaches are very broad and are currently searching relatively unsystematically for “multiple needles in a haystack”.


#

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


Correspondence

Prof. Dr. Emil C. Reisinger
Dept. of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Rostock University Medical Center
Rostock
Germany   

Publication History

Received: 18 July 2024

Accepted after revision: 31 March 2025

Article published online:
23 May 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany


Zoom Image
Fig. 1 60-year-old patient; a CT examination with a slice thickness of 3 mm was performed as initial diagnostic imaging due to suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. For further evaluation of post-pneumonia interstitial parenchymal changes, a high-resolution CT examination with a slice thickness of 1 mm was performed. a Chest CT without contrast (slice thickness: 3 mm) showing bilateral partially arcade-like ground-glass infiltrates, located primarily peripheral/subpleural and in the lower field. b 4 weeks later, chest CT with contrast (slice thickness: 1 mm) in the case of severe dyspnea; significant subpleural reticulations and traction bronchiectasis now visible in the areas of formerly present ground-glass infiltrates; thickened interlobular septa also visible in the case of persistent interstitial infiltrates.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 76-year-old patient with COVID-19 pneumonia and mild fibrosis on follow-up: a Chest CT with contrast (slice thickness: 1 mm) as initial imaging showing bilateral consolidated infiltrates with a peripheral and arcade-like configuration. b Initial follow-up chest CT without contrast (slice thickness: 1 mm) after 2 months showing regression of the consolidations. Persistent ground-glass opacities with subpleural and parapleural reticulations. c Chest CT with contrast (slice thickness: 1 mm) 6 months after initial imaging in the case of persistent dyspnea. Further regression of changes, only fine bands of subpleural reticulations with isolated adjacent areas of traction bronchiectasis are still visible.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 36-year-old patient with myocarditis after COVID infection: 1.5 Tesla MRI, short-axis sequences with two-chamber view; a T2-TIRM sequence showing edema of the myocardium from the midventricular to the distal third of the left ventricle in the inferoseptal segment (thin arrow) 14 days after positive PCR test. b Follow-up MRI examination after 9 months showing intramural scarring at the junction from the midventricular to the distal third of the left ventricle in the inferoseptal segment (thick arrow) in the PSMDE sequence.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Primary care/general medicine approach in accordance with the S1 guidelines of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany regarding post-COVID/long COVID.
Zoom Image
Abb. 1 60-jähriger Patient; zur Initialdiagnostik bei Verdacht auf eine SARS-CoV-2-Pneumonie erfolgte eine CT in 3 mm Schichtdicke. Zur weiterführenden Beurteilung postpneumonischer interstitieller Parenchymveränderungen wurde eine hochauflösende CT in 1 mm Schichtdicke durchgeführt. a CT-Thorax nativ (3 mm Schichtdicke) mit bilateralen teilweise arkadenartigen Milchglasinfiltraten vor allem peripher/subpleural und unterfeldbetont angeordnet. b 4 Wochen später, CT-Thorax mit Kontrastmittel (1mm Schichtdicke) bei schwerer Luftnot, in den Arealen der ehemaligen Milchglasinfiltraten nun deutliche subpleurale Retikulationen sowie Traktionsbronchiektasen, zudem bei persistierenden interstitiellen Infiltraten auch verdickte Interlobulärsepten.
Zoom Image
Abb. 2 76-jähriger Patient mit COVID-19-Pneumonie und leichtgradiger Fibrosierung im Verlauf: a CT-Thorax mit Kontrastmittel (1 mm Schichtdicke) in der Initialbildgebung mit bilateralen, konsolidierenden Infiltraten, peripher und arkadenartig angeordnet. b Erstes Verlaufs-CT-Thorax nativ (1 mm Schichtdicke) nach 2 Monaten mit Regredienz der Konsolidierungen. Persistierende Milchglastrübungen mit subpleuralen und parapleuralen Retikulationen. c CT-Thorax mit Kontrastmittel (1 mm Schichtdicke) 6 Monate nach der Initialbildgebung bei persistierender Dyspnoe. Weitere Regredienz der Veränderungen, nur noch feinstreifige, subpleurale Retikulationen mit angrenzenden, vereinzelten Traktionsbronchiektasen.
Zoom Image
Abb. 3 36-jährige Patientin mit Myokarditis-Verlauf nach Covid-Infektion: 1,5 Tesla MRT, Sequenzen in Kurzachse mit Zweikammerblick a T2-TIRM-Sequenz mit Ödem des Myokards vom mittventrikulären zum distalen Drittel des linken Ventrikels inferoseptal (dünner Pfeil) 14 Tage nach positivem PCR-Test. b Kontroll-MRT nach 9 Monaten, narbige Veränderung intramural am Übergang vom mittventrikulären zum distalen Drittel des linken Ventrikels inferoseptal (dicker Pfeil) in der PSMDE-Sequenz.
Zoom Image
Abb. 4 Hausärztlich-allgemeinmedizinisches Vorgehen nach der AWMF-S1-Leitlinie Post-COVID/Long-COVID.