Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale in Brazil

Abstract

Objective

To examine the psychometric properties of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale (MCSRS), previously translated and adapted to Brazilian Portuguese.

Methods

A methodological and cross-sectional study with data collected at a low-risk maternity hospital, period of 2017 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were early postpartum, maternal age between 18 and 34 years, birth of a live infant, and birth over 36 weeks’ gestation. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the MCSRS with 34 items in six subscales (self, partner, baby, nurse, physicians, and overall childbirth satisfaction) was administered in a face-to-face interview. Psychometric analyses assessed internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) examined dimensionality.

Results

The population included 411 participants. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated a good fitness for the model, comparative fit index (CFI) and goodness-of-fit index (GFI)=0.99; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) (0.07; 95% CI 0.07–0.08); incremental fit index (IFI) and Tucker–Lewis index (TLI)=0.99, which confirmed the six subscales identified in the original scale. The factorial loads of the items were all above 0.70. For the questionnaire’s overall reliability, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.96 and McDonald’s omega was 0.97.

Conclusions

The MCSRS is a valid instrument, being that all subscales had good reliability indexes. CFA inclusion criteria also encompassed women who underwent an unplanned cesarean section, thus extending the use of the MCSRS.

Keywords

Childbirth satisfaction - labor - psychometric - questionnaire - validation studies

• References

• 1 Adhikari M, Paudel NR, Mishra SR. et al. Patient satisfaction and its socio-demographic correlates in a tertiary public hospital in Nepal: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21: 135
• 2 Howarth AM, Swain NR. Low-cost self-paced interventions increase birth satisfaction in first time fathers. Sex Reprod Healthc 2020; 24: 100503
• 3 Ghanbari-Homaie S, Meedya S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S. et al. Recommendations for improving primiparous women’s childbirth experience: results from a multiphase study in Iran. Reprod Health 2021; 18: 146
• 4 Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs 2004; 46: 212-219
• 5 Christiaens W, Bracke P. Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007; 7: 26
• 6 Mas-Pons R, Barona-Vilar C, Carreguí-Vilar S. et al. [Women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: validation of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale]. Gac Sanit 2012; 26: 236-242
• 7 Caballero P, Delgado-García BE, Orts-Cortes I. et al. Validation of the Spanish version of Mackey childbirth satisfaction rating scale. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16: 78
• 8 Moudi Z, Tavousi M. Evaluation of Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale in Iran: What are the psychometric properties?. Nurs Midwifery Stud 2016; 5: e29952
• 9 World Health Organization. Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience. WHO recommendations. Geneva 2018
• 10 Shiva L, Desai G, Satyanarayana VA. et al. Negative childbirth experience and post-traumatic stress disorder – A study among postpartum women in South India. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12: 640014
• 11 Debela AB, Mekuria M, Kolola T. et al. Maternal satisfaction and factors associated with institutional delivery care in Central Ethiopia: A mixed study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15: 387-398
• 12 Lopes F, Carvas Júnior N, Nakamura MU. et al. Content and face validity of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale Questionnaire cross-culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019; 41: 371-378
• 13 Lopes F, Júnior NC, Nakamura MU. et al. Psychometric properties of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale cross-culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 34: 2173-2179
• 14 MacCallum RC, Tucker LR. Representing sources of error in the common factor model: Implications for theory and practice. Psychological Bulletin 1991; 109: 502-511
• 15 Rosseel Y. Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Soft 2012; 48: 1-36
• 16 R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria 2018 Available from https://www.R-project.org/
• 17 Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990; 107: 238-246
• 18 Hair JF, Black B, Babin B. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed.. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2009
• 19 Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol 2013; 105: 399-412
• 20 Bulto GA, Demissie DB, Tasu TL. et al. Mother’s satisfaction with the existing labor and delivery care services at public health facilities in West Shewa zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20: 303
• 21 Howarth AM, Swain NR. Low-cost self-paced interventions increase birth satisfaction in first time fathers. Sex Reprod Healthc 2020; 24: 100503
• 22 Lopes F, Nakamura MU, Nomura RMY. Women’s satisfaction with childbirth in a public hospital in Brazil. Birth 2021; 48: 251-256
• 23 Ngai FW, Xiao X. Perceptions of paternal involvement and labour pain management in Chinese couples during childbirth: A qualitative study. Women Birth 2021; 34: 288-295