Neurosurgery Residency Training and beyond in Turkey: A National Survey Study

Abstract

Study Aims

Training neurosurgery specialists is a challenging and demanding process. This national survey study was conducted to evaluate the infrastructure of neurosurgery residency programs and training clinics in Turkey and to assess how these factors impact specialist practice.

Materials and Methods

A national survey consisting of 32 questions was distributed to neurosurgeons who had been practicing as specialists for at least two years. The survey was divided into four sections: demographic information, residency training process, hospital where they currently work as specialists, and microsurgical experience. Statistical analyses, including chi-square and logistic regression, were conducted to examine factors influencing surgical performance in specialist practice.

Results

Regression analyses indicated that performing skin-to-skin surgeries during residency significantly and most effectively increased the likelihood of performing these procedures as a specialist. Additionally, working in anatomy laboratories, attending hands-on cadaver courses, and increased years of practice were all positively associated with surgical performance. It was also found that participants who graduated within the last 5 years were statistically significantly less likely to have attended hands-on courses or visited another clinic for observerships/fellowships compared with those who graduated more than 5 years ago.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that neurosurgical training in Turkey is affected by disparities in clinical infrastructure and hands-on experience. Standardizing residency experiences and ensuring access to necessary equipment and training resources could enhance neurosurgical competency and consistency in specialist practice.

Keywords

neurosurgery - neurosurgical residency - turkey - training - survey

Publication History

Received: 05 November 2024

Accepted: 13 March 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
18 March 2025

Article published online:
12 June 2025

• References

• 1 Çalış F, Şimşek AT, İnan NG. et al. Factors affecting Turkish medical students' pursuit of a career in neurosurgery: a single center survey study. World Neurosurg 2024; 185: e926-e943
• 2 Whitfield PC, Van Loon J, Peul W. Executive Board of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). European training requirements in neurological surgery: a new outcomes-based 3 stage UEMS curriculum. Brain Spine 2023; 3: 101744
• 3 Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. Sixth Edition.. Pearson; 2013
• 4 Pamir NM, Özduman K. Current status of neurosurgery in Turkey. World Neurosurg 2010; 74 (4-5): 398-401
• 5 Ringel F, Stoffel M, Krieg SM. et al; Ressort 1 of the Neurosurgical Academy (NCA) of the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC) the Berufsverband Deutscher Neurochirurgen (BDNC). Structure of neurosurgical care in Germany in comparison to countries organized in the european association of neurosurgical societies: a need to reorganize neurosurgical training and care in Germany. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2023; 84 (04) 305-315
• 6 Gnanakumar S, Abou El Ela Bourquin B, Robertson FC. et al; World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Young Neurosurgeons Committee. The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies young neurosurgeons survey (part i): demographics, resources, and education. World Neurosurg X 2020; 8: 100083
• 7 Stengel FC, Gandia-Gonzalez ML, Aldea CC. et al. Transformation of neurosurgical training from “see one, do one, teach one” to AR/VR & simulation—a survey by the EANS Young Neurosurgeons. Brain Spine 2022; 2: 100929
• 8 Gnanakumar S, Kostusiak M, Budohoski KP. et al. Effectiveness of cadaveric simulation in neurosurgical training: a review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2018; 118: 88-96
• 9 Teton ZE, Freedman RS, Tomlinson SB. et al. The neurosurgical atlas: advancing neurosurgical education in the digital age. Neurosurg Focus 2020; 48 (03) E17
• 10 Matsushima T, Kobayashi S, Inoue T, Rhoton AS, Vlasak AL, Oliveira E. Albert L. Rhoton Jr., MD: his philosophy and education of neurosurgeons. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2018; 58 (07) 279-289
• 11 Kshettry VR, Mullin JP, Schlenk R, Recinos PF, Benzel EC. The role of laboratory dissection training in neurosurgical residency: results of a national survey. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (05) 554-559
• 12 Dempsey RJ. Editorial. Global neurosurgery: the role of the individual neurosurgeon, the Foundation for International Education in Neurological Surgery, and “service through education” to address worldwide need. Neurosurg Focus 2018; 45 (04) E19
• 13 Ormond DR, Kahamba J, Lillehei KO, Rutabasibwa N. Overcoming barriers to neurosurgical training in Tanzania: international exchange, curriculum development, and novel methods of resource utilization and subspecialty development. Neurosurg Focus 2018; 45 (04) E6
• 14 Sayyahmelli S, Kessely YC, Chen X. et al. From Ibni Sina (Avicenna) to present, history of international fellowship and observership: University of Wisconsin-Madison experience. Turk Neurosurg 2020; 30 (02) 159-162
• 15 Esene IN, Sekabunga J, Dempsey RJ. Postgraduate fellowships, distant continuing education, and funding in neurosurgical education. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2024; 35 (04) 499-507
• 16 Venturini S, Park KB. Evaluating the effectiveness and the impact of donated neurosurgical equipment on neurosurgical units in low- and middle-income countries: the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies experience. World Neurosurg 2018; 109: 98-109
• 17 Park KB, Johnson WD, Dempsey RJ. Global neurosurgery: the unmet need. World Neurosurg 2016; 88: 32-35