Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2546-4853
Partial ampullary endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective cohort study

Abstract
Background
The rescue techniques available for cannulation failure are few in number and have severe limitations. We recently described partial ampullary endoscopic mucosal resection (PA-EMR) as a novel technique for difficult biliary cannulation. We aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of PA-EMR for patients with difficult biliary cannulation in a larger cohort.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cohort study at our tertiary care referral hospital. We recorded demographic factors, procedure-related characteristics, and adverse event rates in patients with difficult biliary cannulation who underwent PA-EMR.
Results
Between June 2021 and June 2022, we performed 1073 consecutive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures on 962 patients; 40 patients (12 male, 28 female, with a mean age of 68.1 [SD 4] years) had difficult biliary cannulation and underwent PA-EMR. Technical success was 100%, and none of the patients required a second session. None of the patients had an adverse event, and we encountered no 30-day mortality. The most typical indication was bile duct stones (60%; n = 24), followed by periampullary tumors (15%; n = 6). The total procedure time was 923 (range 392–1224) seconds.
Conclusion
PA-EMR was an effective and safe rescue technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation.
Publication History
Received: 18 October 2024
Accepted after revision: 25 February 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
25 February 2025
Article published online:
11 April 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1
Maruta S,
Sugiyama H,
Ogasawara S.
et al.
“Salvage techniques” are the key to overcoming difficult biliary cannulation in endoscopic
retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 13627
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Fung BM,
Pitea TC,
Tabibian JH.
Difficult biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: an
overview of advanced techniques. Eur Med J Hepatol 2021; 2022; 9: 73-82
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Guzmán-Calderón E,
Martinez-Moreno B,
Casellas JA.
et al.
Transpancreatic precut papillotomy versus double-guidewire technique in difficult
biliary cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2021;
9: E1758-E1767
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Tokmak S,
Cetin MF,
Torun S.
Feasibility and safety of partial ampullary endoscopic mucosal resection: a novel
technique for difficult biliary cannulation (with video). Surg Endosc 2023; 37: 471-478
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Testoni PA,
Mariani A,
Aabakken L.
et al.
Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal
Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 657-683
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Tokmak S,
Cetin MF,
Torun S.
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the very
elderly by using a combination of intravenous midazolam, ketamine, and pethidine.
Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 887-892
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Haraldsson E,
Lundell L,
Swahn F.
et al.
Endoscopic classification of the papilla of Vater. Results of an inter- and intraobserver
agreement study. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 5: 504-510
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Yue P,
Zhu KX,
Wang HP.
et al.
Clinical significance of different periampullary diverticulum classifications for
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cannulation. World J Gastroenterol
2020; 26: 2403-2415
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Cotton PB,
Eisen GM,
Aabakken L.
et al.
A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest
Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Mukai S,
Itoi T,
Baron TH.
et al.
Indications and techniques of biliary drainage for acute cholangitis in updated Tokyo
Guidelines 2018. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2017; 24: 537-549
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Pécsi D,
Farkas N,
Hegyi P.
et al.
Transpancreatic sphincterotomy is effective and safe in expert hands on the short
term. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64: 2429-2444
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Wen J,
Li T,
Lu Y.
et al.
Comparison of efficacy and safety of transpancreatic septotomy, needle-knife fistulotomy
or both based on biliary cannulation unintentional pancreatic access and papillary
morphology. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2019; 18: 73-78
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Sriram PV,
Rao GV,
Nageshwar RD.
The precut – when, where and how? A review. Endoscopy 2003; 35: S24-S30
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Choudhary A,
Winn J,
Siddique S.
et al.
Effect of precut sphincterotomy on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:
4093-4101
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Itoi T,
Ryozawa S,
Katanuma A.
et al.
Clinical practice guidelines for endoscopic papillectomy. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 394-411
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Johnson G,
Webster G,
Boškoski I.
et al.
Curriculum for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society
of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1071-1087
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Fernandes J,
Canena J,
Alexandrino G.
et al.
Outcomes of single-endoscopist-performed needle-knife fistulotomy for selective biliary
access in 842 consecutive patients: learning curve and changes over a 14-year period
in a retrospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56: 1363-1370
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Sadeghi A,
Arabpour E,
Movassagh-Koolankuh S.
et al.
Primary needle-knife fistulotomy versus standard transpapillary technique for cannulation
of long-size papilla: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2024;
15: e00788
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Maharshi S,
Sharma SS.
Early precut versus primary precut sphincterotomy to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis:
randomized controlled trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 586-593
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Ferlitsch M,
Hassan C,
Bisschops R.
et al.
Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal
Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – update 2024. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 516-545
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Alsakarneh S,
Brotherton T,
Jaber F.
et al.
Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife papillotomy in difficult biliary cannulation:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology Res 2024; 17: 101-108
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Han SY,
Baek DH,
Kim DU.
et al.
Primary needle-knife fistulotomy for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
pancreatitis: importance of the endoscopist’s expertise level. World J Clin Cases
2021; 16: 4166-4177
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Jang SI,
Kim DU,
Cho JH.
et al.
Primary needle-knife fistulotomy versus conventional cannulation method in a high-risk
cohort of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol
2020; 115: 616-624
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Jin YJ,
Jeong S,
Lee DH.
Utility of needle-knife fistulotomy as an initial method of biliary cannulation to
prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in a highly selected at-risk group: a single-arm prospective
feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 808-813
MissingFormLabel